Bourbaki

Example 1

Tag 0078, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0078].

Algebra, VIII, p. 104, § 6. Morita Equivalence of Modules and Algebras

Let us apply Proposition 5 of VIII, p. 104, to the specific case V=BsV = B_s.

a) The mapping J↦J\mapsto PJ is an isomorphism from the ordered set D(Bs)D(B_s) of left ideals of B to the ordered set D(P) of A-submodules of P. The inverse mapping sends an A-submodule M of P to the left ideal J(M) of B consisting of the elements bb of B such that M contains PbPb.

b) The mapping K↦K\mapsto KP is an isomorphism from the ordered set D(Ad)D(A_d) of right ideals of A to the ordered set D(P) of B-submodules of P. The inverse mapping sends a B-submodule V of P to the right ideal K(V) of A consisting of the elements aa of A such that V contains aPaP.

Indeed, the A-module P⊗BBsP\otimes_BB_s can be canonically identified with P. If J is a left ideal of B, then the canonical image of P⊗BJP\otimes_BJ in P⊗BBsP\otimes_BB_s corresponds to PJ through this identification. Consequently, the mapping J↦J\mapsto PJ is an isomorphism of ordered sets from D(Bs)D(B_s) to D(P). Let J∈D(Bs)J\in D(B_s). Denote the set of elements bb of B such that PJ contains PbPb by J′J'. It is a left ideal of B that contains J, and we have PJ′⊂'\subset PJ. Since the mapping J↦J\mapsto PJ is an isomorphism of ordered sets, we necessarily have PJ′='= PJ and J=J′J = J'. This proves a).

Assertion b) follows from assertion a) applied to the invertible (Bo,Ao)k(B^o,A^o)_k-bimodule P.

Note that the ring A is a field if and only if the B-module P is simple.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.