Example 1
Tag 0078, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0078].
Algebra, VIII, p. 104, § 6. Morita Equivalence of Modules and Algebras
Let us apply Proposition 5 of VIII, p. 104, to the specific case .
a) The mapping PJ is an isomorphism from the ordered set of left ideals of B to the ordered set D(P) of A-submodules of P. The inverse mapping sends an A-submodule M of P to the left ideal J(M) of B consisting of the elements of B such that M contains .
b) The mapping KP is an isomorphism from the ordered set of right ideals of A to the ordered set D(P) of B-submodules of P. The inverse mapping sends a B-submodule V of P to the right ideal K(V) of A consisting of the elements of A such that V contains .
Indeed, the A-module can be canonically identified with P. If J is a left ideal of B, then the canonical image of in corresponds to PJ through this identification. Consequently, the mapping PJ is an isomorphism of ordered sets from to D(P). Let . Denote the set of elements of B such that PJ contains by . It is a left ideal of B that contains J, and we have PJ PJ. Since the mapping PJ is an isomorphism of ordered sets, we necessarily have PJ PJ and . This proves a).
Assertion b) follows from assertion a) applied to the invertible -bimodule P.
Note that the ring A is a field if and only if the B-module P is simple.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.