Bourbaki

Corollary 1

Tag 00A5, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00A5].

Algebra, VIII, p. 152, § 9. Radical

Let M be an A-module and N a submodule of M.

a) We have R(N)⊂R(M)∩N\mathfrak{R}(N)\subset \mathfrak{R}(M)\cap N.

b) We have (R(M)+N)/N⊂R(M/N)(\mathfrak{R}(M) + N)/N\subset \mathfrak{R}(M/N). If N is contained in R(M)\mathfrak{R}(M), then we have the equality R(M/N)=R(M)/N\mathfrak{R}(M/N) =\mathfrak{R}(M)/N.

c) The module M/R(M)M/\mathfrak{R}(M) is without radical. If the module M/NM/N is without radical, then we have R(M)⊂N\mathfrak{R}(M)\subset N.

Assertion a) follows from Proposition 1 applied to the canonical injection from N to M, and assertion b) follows from Proposition 1 applied to the canonical mapping from M to M/NM/N. From b), we deduce that M/NM/N is without radical if N=R(M)N =\mathfrak{R}(M) and that we have R(M)⊂N\mathfrak{R}(M)\subset N if M/NM/N is without radical.

It follows from Example 1 that there can exist submodules N containing R(M)\mathfrak{R}(M) such that the radical of M/NM/N is not zero.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.