Corollary 2
Tag 00A6, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00A6].
Algebra, VIII, p. 152, § 9. Radical
Let (Mi)i∈I be a family of A-modules, P its product, and S its direct sum. We have R(P)⊂∏i∈IR(Mi) and R(S)=⨁i∈IR(Mi).
For i∈I, let πi be the projection with index i from P to Mi. By Proposition 1, we have πi(R(P))⊂R(Mi) for every i∈I; this proves the first assertion. We have S⊂P, hence
R(S)⊂S∩R(P)⊂S∩i∈I∏R(Mi)=i∈I⨁R(Mi)
Moreover, we have Mi⊂S and therefore R(Mi)⊂R(S) for every i∈I, and consequently ⊕i∈IR(Mi)⊂R(S).
There exist families of modules such that the radical of the product is not isomorphic to the product of the radicals (Exercise 3 of VIII, p. 166).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Cites