Bourbaki

Example 3

Tag 00AE, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00AE].

Algebra, VIII, p. 154, § 9. Radical

Suppose that A is a principal ideal domain, and let P be a system of representatives consisting of irreducible elements (VII, §1, No. 3, p. 3). If A is a field, then it is without radical by Example 1. If the set P is infinite, then the intersection of the maximal ideals ApAp of A is reduced to 0, so A is without radical. But if P is finite and nonempty, and if we set x=∏p∈Ppx=\prod_{p\in P}p, then the radical of A is equal to ∩p∈PAp=Ax\cap_{p\in P}Ap= Ax (VII, §1, No. 2, p. 3, Proposition 4), hence is not reduced to 0.

Let yy be a nonzero element of A; we write it as y=up1i1⋯priry=up^{i_1}_1\cdots p^{i_r}_r, where uu is invertible in A,p1,...,prA,p_1, . . . , p_r are pairwise distinct elements of P, and i1,...,iri_1, . . . , i_r are strictly positive integers. The maximal ideals of the ring A/AyA/Ay are the ideals Ap1/Ay,...,Apr/AyAp_1/Ay, . . . ,Ap_r/Ay; the radical of the ring A/AyA/Ay is therefore the ideal Ap1⋯pr/AyAp_1\cdots p_r/Ay. In particular, the ring A/AyA/Ay is without radical if and only if we have i1=⋯=ir=1i_1=\cdots =i_r= 1; in this case, we say that yy is without multiple factors.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.