Proposition 8
Tag 00AX, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00AX].
Algebra, VIII, p. 161, § 9. Radical
Let M and be A-modules, and projective covers of M and , respectively, and an A-linear mapping.
a) There exists an A-linear mapping such that .
b) Let be such a mapping. If is surjective (resp. bijective), then is surjective (resp. bijective). If is injective and its image is a direct factor of , then is injective and its image is a direct factor of .
By assumption, the A-module P is projective and the mapping is surjective. Consequently, there exists an A-linear mapping such that (II, §2, No. 2, p. 231, Proposition 4). Assertion a) follows.
Let be a mapping as in a). Suppose that is surjective. Since is surjective, we have . Since is a projective cover of M’, we have , so is surjective. By loc. cit., the kernel of admits a supplementary submodule , so . Now suppose that is bijective. We have , hence . Since is a projective cover of M, we have , hence Ker() . So is injective; since we already know that is surjective, is bijective.
To conclude, suppose that is injective and that its image is a direct factor of . Then there exists an A-linear mapping such that . By a), there exists an A-linear mapping such that . We have ; by the previous paragraph, the mapping is bijective. Denote the converse bijection by ; we have , so is injective, and its image is a direct factor of (II, §1, No. 9, p. 212, Corollary 2).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
- Proposition 5, § 10
- lie-i-s5-lem-2 not in this corpus
Cites
- II, §1, No. 9, p. 212, Corollary 2 not in this corpus
- II, §2, No. 2, p. 231, Proposition 4 not in this corpus