Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 00CD, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00CD].

Algebra, VIII, p. 175, § 10. Modules over an Artinian Ring

Let A be a left Artinian ring and r\mathfrak{r} its radical.

a) Let P be a projective A-module. Denote the canonical mapping from P to P/rPP/\mathfrak{r}P by uu. Then (P,u)(P, u) is a projective cover of P/rPP/\mathfrak{r}P. In particular, the A-module P is finitely generated if and only if P/rPP/\mathfrak{r}P is.

b) Let M be a module over the ring A/rA/\mathfrak{r}. Then M, viewed as an A-module, has a projective cover. If (P,u)(P, u) is such a projective cover, then when passing to the quotient, uu induces an isomorphism from P/rPP/\mathfrak{r}P to M. Moreover, P is indecomposable if and only if M is simple.

c) Let M and M′M' be modules over the ring A/rA/\mathfrak{r}. Let (P,u)(P, u) and (P′,u′)(P', u') be projective covers of the A-modules M and M′M'. Then M and M′M' are isomorphic if and only if P and P′P' are.

The radical r\mathfrak{r} of A is a nilpotent two-sided ideal (VIII, p. 173, Proposition 1). Assertion a) therefore follows from Corollary 1 of VIII, p. 163 and Remark 2 of VIII, p. 161.

Let us prove assertion b). The existence of a projective cover (P,u)(P, u) of M follows from Proposition 4 and the isomorphism from P/rPP/\mathfrak{r}P to M of Proposition 9 of VIII, p. 162. Since the ring A/rA/\mathfrak{r} is semisimple, a module over this ring is indecomposable if and only if it is simple. The last assertion then follows from Corollary 2 of VIII, p. 160.

Let us prove c). Let ff be an isomorphism from P to P′P'; it induces an isomorphism f‾\overline{f} from P/rPP/\mathfrak{r}P to P′/rP′P'/\mathfrak{r}P'. By b), these quotients are isomorphic to M and M′M', respectively. Therefore, M is isomorphic to M′M'. Conversely, by Proposition 8 of VIII, p. 161, every isomorphism ff from M to M′M' lifts to an isomorphism f~\widetilde{f} from P to P′P' such that f∘u=u′∘f~f\circ u=u'\circ \widetilde{f}.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.