Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 00D4, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00D4].

Algebra, VIII, p. 187, § 11. Grothendieck Groups

Let E and F be modules of type C\mathscr{C}. The equality [E]C=[F]C[E]_{\mathscr{C}}= [F]_{\mathscr{C}} holds if and only if there exist exact sequences of modules of type C\mathscr{C}

(E)0⟶L⟶P⟶M⟶0 (\mathscr{E})0\longrightarrow L\longrightarrow P\longrightarrow M\longrightarrow 0
(F)0⟶L⟶Q⟶M⟶0 (\mathscr{F})0\longrightarrow L\longrightarrow Q\longrightarrow M\longrightarrow 0

such that E⊕QE\oplus Q is isomorphic to F⊕PF\oplus P.

The stated condition is sufficient because it implies the relations

[P]C=[L]C+[M]C,[Q]C=[L]C+[M]C,[E]C+[Q]C=[F]C+[P]C [P]_{\mathscr{C}}= [L]_{\mathscr{C}}+[M]_{\mathscr{C}},[Q]_{\mathscr{C}}= [L]_{\mathscr{C}}+[M]_{\mathscr{C}},[E]_{\mathscr{C}}+[Q]_{\mathscr{C}}= [F]_{\mathscr{C}}+[P]_{\mathscr{C}}

which give [E]C=[F]C[E]_{\mathscr{C}}= [F]_{\mathscr{C}}.

Now suppose that we have [E]C=[F]C[E]_{\mathscr{C}}= [F]_{\mathscr{C}}. By the construction of the group K(C)K(\mathscr{C}), there exist two finite families of exact sequences of modules of type C\mathscr{C}

(Gi)0⟶Gi′⟶Gi⟶Gi′′⟶0 (\mathscr{G}_i)0\longrightarrow G'_i\longrightarrow G_i\longrightarrow G''_i\longrightarrow 0

for i∈Ii\in I and

(Hj)0⟶Hj′⟶Hj⟶Hj′′⟶0 (\mathscr{H}_j)0\longrightarrow H'_j\longrightarrow H_j\longrightarrow H''_j\longrightarrow 0

for j∈Jj\in J such that in Z(C)\mathbf{Z}^{(\mathscr{C})}, we have

cl(E) −- cl(F) =∑j∈JrHj−∑i∈IrGi=\sum_{j\in J}r_{\mathscr{H}_j}-\sum_{i\in I}r_{\mathscr{G}_i}.

More explicitly, this relation can be written as

(7) cl(E) +∑i∈I+\sum_{i\in I} cl(Gi_i) +∑j∈J+\sum_{j\in J} cl(Hj′'_j) +∑j∈J+\sum_{j\in J} cl(Hj′′''_j)

= cl(F) +∑i∈I+\sum_{i\in I} cl(Gi′'_i) +∑i∈I+\sum_{i\in I} cl(Gi′′''_i) +∑j∈J+\sum_{j\in J} cl(Hj_j).

Set G=⨁i∈IGi,G′=⨁i∈IGi′G =\bigoplus_{i\in I}G_i, G'=\bigoplus_{i\in I}G'_i, etc. By passing to the direct sums, we obtain the exact sequences

(G)(\mathscr{G}) 0 // G′p{G'}^p // G q^q // G′′G'' // 00,

(H)(\mathscr{H}) 0 // H′r{H'}^r // H s^s // H′′H'' // 0

consisting of modules of type C\mathscr{C}.

Next, let M1,...,Mm,N1,...,NnM_1, . . . ,M_m,N_1, . . . ,N_n be A-modules of type C\mathscr{C}. If we have ∑i=1m\sum^m_{i=1} cl(Mi_i) =∑j=1n=\sum^n_{j=1} cl(Nj_j) in the group Z(C)\mathbf{Z}^{(\mathscr{C})}, then we have m=nm=n and there exists a permutation σ∈Sm\sigma \in \mathfrak{S}_m such that cl(Mi_i) == cl(Nσ(i)_{\sigma(i)}) for every 1⩽i⩽m1\leqslant i\leqslant m (I, §7, No. 9, p. 95, Proposition 11). Consequently, the modules ⨁i=1mMi\bigoplus^m_{i=1}M_i and ⨁j=1nNj\bigoplus^n_{j=1}N_j are isomorphic. In particular, from (7), we deduce the existence of an isomorphism from E⊕QE\oplus Q to F⊕PF\oplus P, where we have set

P=G′⊕G′′⊕H,Q=G⊕H′⊕H′′ P = G'\oplus G''\oplus H,Q = G\oplus H'\oplus H''

We also set

L=G′⊕H′,M=G′′⊕H′′ L = G'\oplus H',M = G''\oplus H''

The modules L, M, P, Q are of type C\mathscr{C}, and the sequence

(E)(\mathscr{E}) 0 // L λ^{\lambda} // P μ^\mu // M // 00,

where we define λ\lambda and μ\mu by

λ(g′,h′)=(g′,0,r(h′)),μ(g′,g′′,h)=(g′′,s(h)) \lambda (g', h') = (g',0, r(h')),\mu(g', g'', h) = (g'', s(h))

is exact. We construct an exact sequence

(F)0⟶L⟶Q⟶M⟶0 (\mathscr{F})0\longrightarrow L\longrightarrow Q\longrightarrow M\longrightarrow 0

in the same way; this concludes the proof.

The set C\mathscr{C} is a commutative monoid for the law of composition (E,E′)↦(E,E')\mapsto cl(E⊕E′\oplus E'). We sometimes denote the group of differences of the commutative monoid C\mathscr{C} (I, §2, No. 4, p. 20) by K′(C)K'(\mathscr{C}) and call it the Grothendieck group of C\mathscr{C} for direct sums. For any module E of type C\mathscr{C}, we denote the image of cl(E) in K′(C)K'(\mathscr{C}) by [E]C′[E]'_{\mathscr{C}}.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.