§ 2. Identity element; cancellable elements; invertible elements
1. Identity element
Definition 1
Under a law of composition on a set an element of is called an identity element if, for all , .
Cited by 1
Cited by Definition 1, I § 4
There exists at most one identity element under a given law , for if and are identity elements then . An identity element is permutable with every element: it is a central element.
Definition 2
A magma with an identity element is called a unital magma. If are unital magmas, a homomorphism of the magma into the magma which maps the identity element of to the identity element of is called a unital homomorphism (or morphism) of into . An associative unital magma is called a monoid.
If are monoids, a unital morphism of into is called a monoid homomorphism or a monoid morphism of into .
Example
(1) In the set of natural numbers 0 is an identity element under addition and 1 is an identity element under multiplication. Each of these two laws gives a commutative monoid structure (Set Theory, III, § 3, no. 3).
(2) In the set of subsets of a set , is an identity element under the law and under the law . More generally, in a lattice the least element, if it exists, is identity element under the law sup; conversely, if there exists an identity element under this law it is the least element of the set. Similarly for the greatest element and the law inf.
(3) The set has no identity element under the law . Under the law between subsets of the diagonal is the identity element. Under the law between mappings of into the identity mapping of onto is the identity element.
(4) Let be a magma and an equivalence relation on compatible with the law on (§ 1, no. 6). If is an identity element of the canonical image of in is an identity element of the magma .
The identity element of a unital magma is a unital homomorphism; the composition of two unital homomorphisms is also one. For a mapping to be a unital magma isomorphism it is necessary and sufficient that it be a bijective unital homomorphism and the inverse mapping is then a unital homomorphism. Let and be unital magmas and the identity element of ; the constant mapping of into mapping to is a unital homomorphism, called a trivial homomorphism.
The product of a family of unital magmas (resp. monoids) is a unital magma (resp. monoid).
Every quotient magma of a unital magma (resp. monoid) is a unital magma (resp. monoid).
Let be a unital magma and its identity element. A submagma of such that is called a unital submagma of . Clearly is the identity element of the magma . Every intersection of unital submagmas of is a unital submagma of . If is a subset of then there exists a smallest unital submagma of containing ; it is called the unital submagma of generated by ; it is equal to if is empty. If is a monoid, a unital submagma of is called a submonoid of .
If is a magma without identity element a submagma of may possess an identity element. For example, if is associative and is an idempotent element of (I, § 1, no. 4), the set of , where runs through , is a submagma of with as identity element.
If is a magma with identity element , a submagma of such that may still possess an identity element.
Definition 3
Let be a unital magma. The identity element of is called the composition of the empty family of elements of .
Cites 2
Cites Theorem 1 (Associativity theorem), I § 1, Theorem 3, I § 1
If is the empty family of elements of E its composition is also denoted by . For example, we write
Let E be a unital magma whose law is denoted by and its identity element. The support of a family of elements of E is the set of indices such that . Let be a family of elements of E with finite support. We shall define the composition in the two following cases:
(a) the set I is totally ordered; (b) E is associative and the are pairwise permutable.
In these two cases let S be the support of the family . If J is a finite subset of I containing S, then , as is seen by induction on the number of elements in J, applying Theorem 1 of § 1 in case (a) and Theorem 3 of § 1 in case (b). Let denote the common value of the compositions for all finite subsets of I containing S. When I is the interval of , we also write .
With these definitions and notation, Theorems 1 and 3 of § 1 and the remarks following Theorem 3 extend to families with finite support.
The identity element of a law written additively is usually denoted by 0 and called zero or the null element (or sometimes the origin). Under a law written multiplicatively it is usually denoted by 1 and called the unit element (or unit).
2. Cancelable elements
Definition 4
Given a law of composition on a set E, the mapping (resp. ) of E into itself is called left translation (resp. right translation) by an element .
On passing to the opposite law, left translations become right translations and conversely.
Let (or ) denote the left and right translations by ; then
Proposition 1
If the law* is associative, then for all and
Cited by 2
Cited by Proposition 2, Proposition 3
For all :
In other words, the mapping is a homomorphism from the magma to the set of mappings of into itself with the law ; the mapping is a homomorphism of into the set with the opposite law. If is a monoid, these homomorphisms are unital.
Definition 5
An element* of a magma is called left (resp. right) cancellable (or regular) if left (resp. right) translation by *is injective. A left and right cancellable element is called a cancellable (or regular) element.
Cited by 1
Cited by Proposition 1 (« addition of inequalities »), VI § 1
In other words, for to be cancellable under the law , it is necessary and sufficient that each of the relations imply (it is said that "a can be cancelled" from each of these equalities). If there exists an identity element under the law , it is cancellable under this law: the translations and are then the identity mapping of onto itself.
Example
(1) Every natural number is cancellable under addition; every natural number is cancellable under multiplication.
(2) In a lattice there can be no cancellable element under the law sup other than the identity element (least element) if it exists; similarly for inf. In particular, in the set of subsets of a set , is the only cancellable element under the law and the only cancellable element under the law .
Proposition 2
The set of cancellable (resp. left cancellable, resp. right cancellable) elements of an associative magma is a submagma.
Cites 1 · Cited by 2
Cites Proposition 1
Cited by Proposition 6, Proposition 1 (« addition of inequalities »), VI § 1
If and are injective so is (Proposition 1). Similarly for .
3. Invertible elements
Definition 6
Let* be a unital magma, its law of composition, e its identity element and and two elements of . is called a left inverse (resp. right inverse, resp. inverse) of if *(resp. , resp. ).
Cited by 1
An element of is called left invertible (resp. right invertible, resp. invertible) if it has a left inverse (resp. right inverse, resp. inverse).
A monoid all of whose elements are invertible is called a group.
Symmetric and symmetrizable are sometimes used instead of inverse and invertible. When the law on E is written additively, we generally say negative instead of inverse.
Example
(1) An identity element is its own inverse.
(2) In the set of mappings of E into E an element f is left invertible (resp. right invertible) if f is a surjection (resp. injection). The left inverses (resp. right inverses) are then the retractions (resp. sections) associated with f (Set Theory, II, § 3, no. 8, Definition 11). For f to be invertible it is necessary and sufficient that f be a bijection. Its unique inverse is then the inverse bijection of f.
Let E and F be two unital magmas and f a unital homomorphism of E into F. If x' is the inverse of x in E, f(x') is the inverse of f(x) in F. Hence, if x is an invertible element of E, f(x) is an invertible element of F.
In particular, if R is an equivalence relation compatible with the law on a unital magma E, the canonical image of an invertible element of E is invertible in E/R.
Cites 1
Cites Definition 11, E II § 3
Proposition 3
Let E be a monoid and x an element of E.
(i) For x to be left (resp. right) invertible it is necessary and sufficient that the right (resp. left) translation by x be surjective.
(ii) For x to be invertible it is necessary and sufficient that it be left and right invertible. In that case x has a unique inverse, which is also its unique left (resp. right) inverse.
If x' is a left inverse of x then (Proposition 1)
and is surjective. Conversely, if is surjective, there exists an element of E such that and is the left inverse of . The other assertions of (i) follow similarly.
If (resp. ) is a left (resp. right) inverse of , then
whence (ii).
Remark
Let E be a monoid and x an element of E. If x is left invertible it is left cancellable; for, if is a left inverse of , then
and is injective. In particular, if x is left invertible, the left and right translations by x are bijective. Conversely, suppose that is bijective; there exists such that ; then and hence , so that x is invertible. We see similarly that if is bijective, x is invertible.
Proposition 4
Let E be a monoid and x and y invertible elements of E with inverses x' and y' respectively. Then y' x' is the inverse of x y.
Cited by 7
Cited by § 2. Identity element; cancellable elements; invertible elements, Lemma 2, Remark, Corollary 1, Proposition 6, Theorem 1, Example, I § 4
This follows from the relation
Corollary 1
Let E be a monoid; if each of the elements of an ordered sequence of elements of E has an inverse , the composition has inverse , where A' is the totally ordered set derived from A by replacing the order on A by the opposite order.
This corollary follows from Proposition 4 by induction on the number of elements in A.
In particular, if x and x' are inverses, and are inverses for every integer .
Corollary 2
In a monoid the set of invertible elements is stable.
Proposition 5
If in a monoid x and x' are inverses and x commutes with y, so does x'.
Cited by 3
Cited by Theorem 1, Corollary 2, I § 4, Proposition 1, I § 9
From , we deduce and hence , that is .
Corollary 1
Let E be a monoid, X a subset of E and X' the centralizer of X. The inverse of every invertible element of X' belongs to X'.
Cited by 1
Cited by Proposition 2, I § 4
Corollary 2
In a monoid the inverse of a central invertible element is a central element.
4. Monoid of fractions of a commutative monoid
In this no., e will denote the identity element of a monoid and x* the inverse of an invertible element x of E.
Let E be a commutative monoid, S a subset of E and S' the submonoid of E generated by S.
"there exist and such that and "
is an equivalence relation compatible with the law on the product monoid E S'.
It is immediate that R is reflexive and symmetric. Let and be elements of E S' such that Rx, y and Ry, z hold. Then there exist two elements s and t of S' such that
and hence holds, for belongs to . The relation is therefore transitive.
Further, let and be elements of such that and hold. There exist and in such that
The quotient magma is a commutative monoid.
Definition 7
Let be a commutative monoid, a subset of and the submonoid of generated by . The quotient monoid , where the equivalence relation is as described in Lemma 1, is denoted by and is called the monoid of fractions† of associated with (or with denominators in ).
For and the class of modulo is in general denoted by and called the fraction with numerator and denominator . Then by definition . The fractions and are equal if and only if there exists in with ; if so, there exist and in with and . In particular, for and in . The identity element of is the fraction .
Let for all . The above shows that is a homomorphism of into , called canonical. For all , and hence is the inverse of ; every element of is therefore invertible. Then , whence
Proposition 6
The notation is that of Definition 7 and denotes the canonical homomorphism of into . (i) Let and be in ; in order that , it is necessary and sufficient that there exist with . (ii) For to be injective it is necessary and sufficient that every element of be cancellable. (iii) For to be bijective it is necessary and sufficient that every element of be invertible.
Cites 3 · Cited by 4
Cites Definition 7, Proposition 2, Proposition 4
Cited by Remark, Definition 8, I § 8, VIII § 11. Grothendieck Groups, Proposition 6, VIII § 11
Assertion (i) is clear and shows that is injective if and only if every element of is cancellable; but since the set of cancellable elements of is a submonoid of (no. 2, Proposition 2), it amounts to the same to say that every element of is cancellable.
† It is also called monoid of differences if the law on is written additively.
If is bijective every element of S is invertible, for is composed of invertible elements of . Conversely, suppose every element of S is invertible; then every element of is invertible (no. 3, Corollary 2 to Proposition 4) and hence cancellable. Then is injective by (ii) and by (1), hence is surjective.
Theorem 1
Let E be a commutative monoid, S a subset of E, the monoid of fractions associated with S and the canonical homomorphism. Further let f be a homomorphism of E into a monoid F (not necessarily commutative) such that every element of is invertible in F. There exists one and only one homomorphism of into F such that .
Cites 2 · Cited by 6
Cites Proposition 4, Proposition 5
Cited by Exercise 16, § 2, Exercise 17, § 2, Lemma 2, Remark, Theorem 5, I § 8, Proposition 6, VIII § 11
If is a homomorphism of into F such that , then
Let g be the mapping of into F defined by . We show that g is a homomorphism of into F. First of all,
Corollary
Let E and F be two commutative monoids, S and T subsets of E and F respectively, f a homomorphism of E into F such that and the canonical homomorphisms. There exists one and only one homomorphism such that .
The homomorphism of E into maps every element of S to an invertible element of .
Remark
(1) Theorem 1 can also be expressed by saying that is the solution of the universal mapping problem for E, relative to monoids, monoid homomorphisms and homomorphisms of E into monoids which map the elements of S to invertible elements (Set Theory, IV, , no. 1). It follows (loc. cit.) that every other solution of this problem is isomorphic in a unique way to
(2) For the existence of a solution to the above universal mapping problem it is unnecessary to assume that the monoid E is commutative, as follows from Set Theory, IV, § 3, no. 2 (cf. Exercise 17).
We mention two important special cases of monoids of fractions.
(a) Let . As the monoid is generated by the set , which is composed of invertible elements, every element of is invertible (no. 3, Corollary 2 to Proposition 4). In other words, is a commutative group. Moreover, by Theorem 1 every homomorphism of E into a group G can be uniquely factorized in the form , where is a homomorphism. is called the group of fractions of E (or group of differences of E in the case of additive notation).
(b) Let , where consists of the cancellable elements of E. By Proposition 6, (ii), the canonical homomorphism of E into is injective; it will be profitable to identify E with its image in . Hence E is a submonoid of , every cancellable element of E has an inverse in and every element of is of the form with and ; then if and only if . It is easily seen that the invertible elements of are the fractions , where and are cancellable, and is the inverse of .
Now let S be a set of cancellable elements of E and be the submonoid of E generated by S. If and are two elements of , then if and only if (for implies for all ). may therefore be identified with the submonoid of generated by .
If every element of E is cancellable, then and E is a submonoid of the commutative group . Conversely, if E is isomorphic to a submonoid of a group, every element of E is cancellable.
Cites 5
Cites Theorem 1, Exercise 17, § 2, E IV § 3. Universal mappings, Proposition 4, Proposition 6
5. Applications: I. Rational integers
Consider the commutative monoid of natural numbers with law of composition addition; all the elements of are cancellable under this law (Set Theory, III, § 5, no. 2, Corollary 3). The group of differences of is denoted by ; its elements are called the rational integers; its law is called addition of rational integers and also denoted by +. The canonical homomorphism from to is injective and we shall identify each element of with its image in . The elements of are by definition the equivalence classes determined in by the relation between and which is written ; an element of is identified with the class consisting of the elements , where ; it admits as negative in the class of elements . Every element of may be written in the form if or in the form if ; it follows that is the union of and the set of negatives of the elements of . The identity element 0 is the only element of whose negative belongs to .
For every natural number , denotes the negative rational integer of and denotes the set of elements for . Then
for , if and only if .
Let and be two natural numbers;
(a) if , then , where is the element of such that ; (b) if , then , where is the element of such that ; (c) .
Properties (b) and (c) follow from no. 3, Proposition 4; as , addition in and properties (a), (b) and (c) describe completely addition in .
More generally is used to denote the negative of an arbitrary rational integer ; the composition is abbreviated to (cf. no. 8).
The order relation between natural numbers is characterized by the following property: if and only if there exists an integer such that (Set Theory, III, § 3, no. 6, Proposition 13 and § 5, no. 2, Proposition 2). The relation between rational integers and is a total order relation on which extends the order relation on . For, for all , ; if and , then
for is stable under addition; if and , then , for 0 is the only element of whose negative belongs to ; for arbitrary rational integers and , or , for ; finally, if and are natural numbers, then if and only if there exists such that . This order relation is also denoted by .
Henceforth when is considered as an ordered set, it will always be, unless otherwise mentioned, with the ordering that has just been defined, the natural numbers are identified with the integers ; they are also called positive integers; the integers , negatives of the positive integers, are called negative integers; the integers (resp. ) are called strictly positive (resp. strictly negative); the set of integers is sometimes denoted by .
Let , and be three rational integers; then if and only if x + z \leq y + z. For x - y = (x + z) - (y + z). This property is expressed by saying that the order relation on is invariant under translation.
6. Applications: II. Multiplication of rational integers
Lemma 2
Let E be a monoid and x an element of E. (i) There exists a unique homomorphism f of into E with and for all . (ii) If x is invertible, there exists a unique homomorphism g of into E such that and g coincides with f on .
Cites 5 · Cited by 1
Cites Proposition 1, I § 1, Proposition 4, Theorem 1, E III § 3. Equipotent sets. Cardinals, Corollary, E III § 3
Cited by § 2. Identity element; cancellable elements; invertible elements
Writing for all , the formulae
Suppose now that x is invertible. By no. 3, Corollary 2 to Proposition 4, is invertible for every integer . By construction, is the group of differences of and hence (no. 4, Theorem 1) f extends uniquely to a homomorphism g of into E. If is a homomorphism of into E with , the restriction of to is a homomorphism of into E with . Hence , whence .
We shall apply Lemma 2 to the case where the monoid E is ; for every integer there therefore exists an endomorphism of characterized by . If m is in , the mapping of into is an endomorphism of the magma (Set Theory, III, § 3, no. 3, Corollary to Proposition 5); hence for all in .
Multiplication on can therefore be extended to multiplication on by the formula for in . We shall establish the formulae:
(2)
for in . (In other words, is a commutative ring.) The formulae and express the fact that is an endomorphism of the additive monoid and may be written . The endomorphism of maps 1 to and hence is equal to , whence (3). Now , that is ; similarly, the endomorphism of maps 1 to , whence and therefore
7. Applications: III. Generalized powers
Let E be a monoid with identity element and law of composition denoted by . If is invertible in E, let be the homomorphism of into E mapping 1 to . Let for all ; by Lemma 2 this notation is compatible for with the notation introduced earlier. Then
8. Notation
(a) As a general rule the law of a commutative monoid is written additively. It is then a convention that denotes the negative of . The notation is abbreviated to and similarly
For the notation is replaced by . Formulae (9) to (12) then become
(13)
where and belong to or even to if admits a negative. Also in the latter case the relation holds. We also note the formula
(17)
(b) Let E be a monoid written multiplicatively. For the notation is replaced by . We have the relations
and also if and commute.
When has an inverse, this is precisely . The notation is also used instead of . Finally, when the monoid E is commutative, or is also used for .
Exercises
See the exercises for § 2.