Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 00FA, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00FA].

Algebra, VIII, p. 229, § 13. Absolutely Semisimple Algebras

Let K be a commutative field and A a K-algebra.

a) Every direct sum of absolutely semisimple A-modules is an absolutely semisimple A-module. Every submodule and quotient module of an absolutely semisimple module is absolutely semisimple.

b) Let M be an A-module and let L be an extension of the field K. The A-module M is absolutely semisimple if and only if the A(L)A_{(L)}-module M(L)M_{(L)} is absolutely semisimple.

Assertion a) follows from the analogous assertion for semisimple modules (VIII, p. 56, Corollaries 1 and 3).

Suppose that the A-module M is absolutely semisimple, and let L′L' be an extension of L. As an A(L′)A_{(L')}-module, L′⊗LM(L)L'\otimes_LM_{(L)} is isomorphic to M(L′)M_{(L')} (II, §5, No. 1, p. 273, Proposition 2); it is therefore a semisimple module. This proves that M(L)M_{(L)} is absolutely semisimple.

Conversely, suppose that M(L)M_{(L)} is absolutely semisimple. Let L′L' be an extension of K. There exists a composite extension (Ω,u,v)(\Omega , u, v) of L and L′L' (V, §2, No. 4, p. 13, Corollary); we identify L and L′L' with subextensions of Ω. The A(Ω)A_{(\Omega )}-module M(Ω)M_{(\Omega )} is isomorphic to (M(L))(Ω)(M_{(L)})_{(\Omega )}; it is therefore semisimple. But M(Ω)M_{(\Omega )} is also isomorphic to (M(L′))(Ω)(M_{(L')})_{(\Omega )}, and Proposition 8, a) of VIII, p. 222 implies that M(L′)M_{(L')} is semisimple. So M is absolutely semisimple.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.