Bourbaki

Proposition 2

Tag 00FB, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00FB].

Algebra, VIII, p. 230, § 13. Absolutely Semisimple Algebras

Let K be a commutative field, A a K-algebra, and M an A-module that is finite-dimensional over K. The following properties are equivalent:

(i) The A-module M is absolutely semisimple.

(ii) There exists an extension P of K that is a perfect field such that the A(P)A_{(P)}-module M(P)M_{(P)} is semisimple.

(iii) The A-module M is semisimple, and the center of its commutant is an étale algebra over the field K.

It is clear that (i) implies (ii). Assume that (ii) holds; then the A(P)A_{(P)}-module M(P)M_{(P)} is absolutely semisimple by Corollary 1, a) of VIII, p. 222. By Proposition 1, b), M is then absolutely semisimple. Therefore, (ii) implies (i).

Suppose that M is semisimple. Let Z be the center of the commutant of M; it is a commutative algebra of finite degree over the field K. If L is an extension of K, then it follows from Proposition 8, b) of VIII, p. 222 that the A(L)A_{(L)}-module M(L)M_{(L)} is semisimple if and only if the ring Z(L)Z_{(L)} is reduced. The equivalence of (i) and (iii) therefore follows from Theorem 4 of V, §6, No. 7, p. 34.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.