Theorem 1
Tag 00FG, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00FG].
Algebra, VIII, p. 232, § 13. Absolutely Semisimple Algebras
Let K be a commutative field and A a K-algebra. The following properties are equivalent:
(i) The K-algebra A is absolutely semisimple.
(ii) The algebra A has finite degree over K, and there exists an extension P of K that is a perfect field, for which the P-algebra is semisimple.
(iii) The K-algebra A is semisimple and has finite degree over K, and its center is an étale K-algebra.
(iv) There exists a finite family , where is a strictly positive integer and a K-algebra of finite degree that is a field, such that the center of is a separable extension of K for every and A is isomorphic to the product of the matrix rings .
(v) There exist an extension L of K and a finite family of integers such that the L-algebra is isomorphic to the algebra .
(vi) There exist a Galois extension L of K of finite degree and a finite family of integers such that is isomorphic to the product of the matrix algebras .
We first prove the implications (v) (iv) (iii) (ii) (i). Denote the center of A by Z.
If property (v) holds, then the L-algebra is semisimple and has finite degree over L, and its center (isomorphic to , III, p. 41, Corollary) is isomorphic to for some integer . By Corollary 2, a) of VIII, p. 222, the algebra A is semisimple and has finite degree over K. It is therefore isomorphic to a finite product of rings with for every , where the field is an algebra of finite degree over K. The center of is a commutative field that is an extension of K, and Z is isomorphic to . Therefore, is isomorphic, on the one hand, to and, on the other hand, to . In other words, the algebra is étale over the field K (V, §6, No. 3, p. 28, Definition 1), and each of the extensions is separable over K (V, §6, No. 4, p. 31, Corollary, and V, §7, No. 1, p. 42). So (v) implies (iv).
If property (iv) holds, then it is clear that A is a semisimple algebra and has finite degree over K. Its center Z is isomorphic to the product of separable extensions of K of finite degree; it is therefore an étale algebra (loc. cit.). So (iv) implies (iii).
The implications (iii) (ii) (i) follow from Proposition 2 of VIII, p. 230 applied to the A-module .
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Cites
- V, §6, No. 4, p. 31
- V, §6, No. 3, p. 28, Definition 1 not in this corpus
- V, §7, No. 1, p. 42
- Corollary 2, a) of VIII, p. 222
- Proposition 2 of VIII, p. 230