Lemma 4
Tag 00FJ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00FJ].
Algebra, VIII, p. 234, § 13. Absolutely Semisimple Algebras
Let A and B be algebras over the field K that have finite generating sets, and let be an extension of K. If the -algebras and are isomorphic, then there exists a subextension L of , finitely generated over K, such that the L-algebras and are isomorphic.
Let and be finite generating sets for the algebras A and B, respectively. Let be an isomorphism from to and the inverse isomorphism; there exists a subextension L of , finitely generated over K, such that we have for every and for every . Consequently, sends into , and sends into . The induced mappings and are ring homomorphisms; they are inverse bijections.
Let us complete the proof of the implication (i)(vi). Let be a separable closure of K (V, §7, No. 8, p. 45). Then is an absolutely semisimple algebra over . By the implication (i)(iv), the -algebra is isomorphic to a product , where is a -algebra of finite degree that is a field whose center is a separable extension of . Since is separably closed, we have . By Proposition 3 of VIII, p. 231, the field is commutative. We therefore have . We denote the K-algebra by B. The -algebras and are isomorphic by the above. Every subextension of that is finitely generated over K is separable and has finite degree over K, hence is contained in a subextension L of that is Galois and of finite degree over K (V, §10, No. 1, p. 57, Proposition 2). The implication therefore follows from Lemma 4.
The implication (vi)(v) is immediate.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Cites
- V, §10, No. 1, p. 57, Proposition 2 not in this corpus
- V, §7, No. 8, p. 45
- Proposition 3 of VIII, p. 231