Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 00FO, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00FO].

Algebra, VIII, p. 236, § 13. Absolutely Semisimple Algebras

The following properties are equivalent:

(i) The B-module A is projective.

(ii) There exists an element ee of the (A,A)(A,A)-bimodule B satisfying the following two conditions: ε(e)=1\varepsilon (e) = 1 and ae=eaae=ea for every a∈Aa\in A.

The mapping ε:B→A\varepsilon : B\rightarrow A is surjective because we have ε(a⊗1)=a\varepsilon (a\otimes 1) =a for every a∈Aa\in A; it is a homomorphism of (A(A, A)-modules, hence a B-linear mapping. If the B-module A is projective, then there exists a section ss of ε\varepsilon (II, §2, No. 2, p. 231, Proposition 4); it is a homomorphism of (A(A, A)-bimodules from A to B. If we set e=se=s(1), then we have ε(e)=ε(s(1))=1\varepsilon (e) =\varepsilon (s(1)) = 1 and ae=s(a)=eaae=s(a) =ea for every a∈Aa\in A. So (i) implies (ii).

Conversely, let ee be an element of B satisfying the conditions in item (ii). Define a mapping ss from A to B by the formula

s(a)=ae=ea(1) s(a) =ae=ea \tag{1}

It is a homomorphism of (A(A, A)-modules, and we have ε∘s=1A\varepsilon \circ s= 1_A; in other words, ss is a B-linear section of the surjective mapping ε\varepsilon. Consequently, the B-module A is isomorphic to the direct factor submodule s(A)s(A) of BsB_s (II, §1, No. 9, p. 211, Proposition 15) and is therefore projective (II, §2, No. 2, p. 231, Proposition 4). This proves that (ii) implies (i).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

  • II, §1, No. 9, p. 211, Proposition 15 not in this corpus
  • II, §2, No. 2, p. 231, Proposition 4 not in this corpus
Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.