Bourbaki

Proposition 7

Tag 00FY, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00FY].

Algebra, VIII, p. 243, § 13. Absolutely Semisimple Algebras

Suppose that the (A⊗KA‾o)(A\otimes_K\overline{A}^o)-module A‾\overline{A} is projective.

a) Let S1S_1 and S2S_2 be subalgebras of A satisfying A=S1⊕r=S2⊕rA = S_1\oplus \mathfrak{r}= S_2\oplus \mathfrak{r}. There exists a special automorphism of A transforming S1S_1 into S2S_2.

b) Suppose that π\pi has a K-linear section and that the radical r\mathfrak{r} of A is nilpotent. Then there exists a subalgebra S of A satisfying A=S⊕rA = S\oplus \mathfrak{r}.

Let S1S_1 and S2S_2 be as in a). Let s1s_1 and s2s_2 be the elements of the set Σ corresponding to the subalgebras S1S_1 and S2S_2. Let ε\varepsilon be the K-linear mapping from A⊗KAA\otimes_KA to A given by ε(a⊗b)=ab\varepsilon (a\otimes b) =ab. By Proposition 5 of VIII, p. 236 and Remark 1 of VIII, p. 237, there exists an element e=∑i=1rαi⊗αi′e=\sum^r_{i=1}\alpha_i\otimes \alpha '_i of A‾⊗KA\overline{A}\otimes_KA satisfying ∑i=1rαiαi′=1\sum^r_{i=1}\alpha_i\alpha '_i= 1 and ∑i=1rααi⊗αi′=∑i=1rαi⊗αi′α\sum^r_{i=1}\alpha \alpha_i\otimes \alpha '_i=\sum^r_{i=1}\alpha_i\otimes \alpha '_i\alpha for every α∈A\alpha \in A. Set x=∑i=1rs1(αi)s2(αi′)x=\sum^r_{i=1}s_1(\alpha_i)s_2(\alpha '_i). We have π(x)=∑i=1rαiαi′=1\pi (x) =\sum^r_{i=1}\alpha_i\alpha '_i= 1 and therefore x∈1+rx\in 1 +\mathfrak{r}. Let α\alpha be an element of A. We have

s1(α)x=∑i=1rs1(ααi)s2(αi′)=(ε∘(s1⊗s2))(∑i=1rααi⊗αi′) s_1(\alpha )x=\sum_{i=1}^rs_1(\alpha \alpha_i)s_2(\alpha '_i) = (\varepsilon \circ (s_1\otimes s_2))(\sum_{i=1}^r\alpha \alpha_i\otimes \alpha '_i)
=(ε∘(s1⊗s2))(∑i=1rαi⊗αi′α)=∑i=1rs1(αi)s2(αi′α)=xs2(α) = (\varepsilon \circ (s_1\otimes s_2))(\sum_{i=1}^r\alpha_i\otimes \alpha '_i\alpha )=\sum_{i=1}^rs_1(\alpha_i)s_2(\alpha '_i\alpha ) =xs_2(\alpha )

The equality x−1S1x=S2x^{-1}S_1x= S_2 follows, giving assertion a).

Under the assumptions of b), suppose furthermore that r2=0\mathfrak{r}^2= 0. In this case, the (A(A, A)-bimodule r\mathfrak{r} is annihilated by r\mathfrak{r}, and we therefore view it as an (A(A, A)-bimodule. Choose a K-linear section σ\sigma of π\pi. We have

(19) αx=σ(α)x\alpha x=\sigma (\alpha )x and xα=xσ(α)x\alpha =x\sigma (\alpha )

for α∈A‾\alpha \in \overline{A} and x∈rx\in \mathfrak{r}. Set

φ(α,β)=σ(αβ)−σ(α)σ(β)(20) \varphi (\alpha , \beta ) =\sigma (\alpha \beta )-\sigma (\alpha )\sigma (\beta ) \tag{20}

for α,β∈A\alpha , \beta \in A. We have the relation π(φ(α,β))=αβ−αβ=0\pi (\varphi (\alpha , \beta )) =\alpha \beta -\alpha \beta = 0 for α,β∈A\alpha , \beta \in A. Therefore, φ\varphi defines an element of C2(A,r)C^2(A,\mathfrak{r}). Let α,β,γ\alpha , \beta , \gamma be elements of A; in view of (19), we have

∂2φ(α,β,γ)=αφ(β,γ)−φ(αβ,γ)+φ(α,βγ)−φ(α,β)γ \partial^2\varphi (\alpha , \beta , \gamma ) =\alpha \varphi (\beta , \gamma )-\varphi (\alpha \beta , \gamma ) +\varphi (\alpha , \beta \gamma )-\varphi (\alpha , \beta )\gamma
=σ(α)φ(β,γ)−φ(αβ,γ)+φ(α,βγ)−φ(α,β)σ(γ) =\sigma (\alpha )\varphi (\beta , \gamma )-\varphi (\alpha \beta , \gamma ) +\varphi (\alpha , \beta \gamma )-\varphi (\alpha , \beta )\sigma (\gamma )
=σ(α)(σ(βγ)−σ(β)σ(γ))−σ(αβγ)+σ(αβ)σ(γ)+σ(αβγ) =\sigma (\alpha )(\sigma (\beta \gamma )-\sigma (\beta )\sigma (\gamma ))-\sigma (\alpha \beta \gamma ) +\sigma (\alpha \beta )\sigma (\gamma ) +\sigma (\alpha \beta \gamma )
−σ(α)σ(βγ)−(σ(αβ)−σ(α)σ(β))σ(γ) -\sigma (\alpha )\sigma (\beta \gamma )-(\sigma (\alpha \beta )-\sigma (\alpha )\sigma (\beta ))\sigma (\gamma )
=0 = 0

By Theorem 3 of VIII, p. 242, the K-module H2(A,r)H^2(A,\mathfrak{r}) is reduced to zero. Hence there exists an element ψ\psi of C1(A,r)C^1(A,\mathfrak{r}) such that ∂1ψ=φ\partial^1\psi =\varphi, in other words, such that we have

(21) φ(α,β)=αψ(β)−ψ(αβ)+ψ(α)β\varphi (\alpha , \beta ) =\alpha \psi (\beta )-\psi (\alpha \beta ) +\psi (\alpha )\beta for α,β\alpha , \beta in A‾\overline{A}.

We have ψ(α)ψ(β)=0\psi (\alpha )\psi (\beta ) = 0 because r2\mathfrak{r}^2 is zero; from (19) and (20), we then deduce (22) (σ+ψ)(αβ)=(σ+ψ)(α)(σ+ψ)(β)(\sigma +\psi )(\alpha \beta ) = (\sigma +\psi )(\alpha )(\sigma +\psi )(\beta ),

so that the K-linear section σ+ψ\sigma +\psi of π\pi belongs to Σ. Its image is a subalgebra S of A such that A=S+rA = S +\mathfrak{r}.

Let us now prove the existence of S in the general case. We reason by induction on the least integer p⩾1p\geqslant 1 such that rp=0\mathfrak{r}^p= 0; the case p=1p= 1 is trivial. Suppose p⩾2p\geqslant 2, and set A′=A/rp−1A'= A/\mathfrak{r}^{p-1}. The radical r′\mathfrak{r}' of A′A' is equal to r/rp−1\mathfrak{r}/\mathfrak{r}^{p-1} (Proposition 5 of VIII, p. 155), so satisfies r′p−1=0{\mathfrak{r}'}^{p-1}= 0, and the algebra A′/r′A'/\mathfrak{r}' is isomorphic to A‾=A/r\overline{A}= A/\mathfrak{r} and is therefore absolutely semisimple. By the induction hypothesis, there exists a subalgebra S′S' of A′A' such that A′=S′⊕r′A'= S'\oplus \mathfrak{r}'. Then S′S' is of the form A′′/rp−1A''/\mathfrak{r}^{p-1}, where A′′A'' is a subalgebra of A containing rp−1\mathfrak{r}^{p-1}, and we have

A=A′′+r,rp−1=A′′∩r(23) A = A''+\mathfrak{r},\mathfrak{r}^{p-1}= A''\cap \mathfrak{r} \tag{23}

The algebra A′′/rp−1A''/\mathfrak{r}^{p-1} is isomorphic to A′/r′A'/\mathfrak{r}'; we have (rp−1)2=0(\mathfrak{r}^{p-1})^2= 0, so rp−1\mathfrak{r}^{p-1} is the radical of A′′A''. By the case we just treated, there exists a subalgebra S of A′′A'' such that A′′=S⊕rp−1A''= S\oplus \mathfrak{r}^{p-1}; we deduce the relation A=S⊕rA = S\oplus \mathfrak{r} from (23).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.