Suppose that the (A⊗KAo)-module A is projective.
a) Let S1 and S2 be subalgebras of A satisfying A=S1⊕r=S2⊕r. There exists a special automorphism of A transforming S1 into S2.
b) Suppose that π has a K-linear section and that the radical r of A is nilpotent. Then there exists a subalgebra S of A satisfying A=S⊕r.
Let S1 and S2 be as in a). Let s1 and s2 be the elements of the set Σ corresponding to the subalgebras S1 and S2. Let ε be the K-linear mapping from A⊗KA to A given by ε(a⊗b)=ab. By Proposition 5 of VIII, p. 236 and Remark 1 of VIII, p. 237, there exists an element e=∑i=1rαi⊗αi′ of A⊗KA satisfying ∑i=1rαiαi′=1 and ∑i=1rααi⊗αi′=∑i=1rαi⊗αi′α for every α∈A. Set x=∑i=1rs1(αi)s2(αi′). We have π(x)=∑i=1rαiαi′=1 and therefore x∈1+r. Let α be an element of A. We have
s1(α)x=i=1∑rs1(ααi)s2(αi′)=(ε∘(s1⊗s2))(i=1∑rααi⊗αi′)
=(ε∘(s1⊗s2))(i=1∑rαi⊗αi′α)=i=1∑rs1(αi)s2(αi′α)=xs2(α)
The equality x−1S1x=S2 follows, giving assertion a).
Under the assumptions of b), suppose furthermore that r2=0. In this case, the (A, A)-bimodule r is annihilated by r, and we therefore view it as an (A, A)-bimodule. Choose a K-linear section σ of π. We have
(19) αx=σ(α)x and xα=xσ(α)
for α∈A and x∈r. Set
φ(α,β)=σ(αβ)−σ(α)σ(β)(20)
for α,β∈A. We have the relation π(φ(α,β))=αβ−αβ=0 for α,β∈A. Therefore, φ defines an element of C2(A,r). Let α,β,γ be elements of A; in view of (19), we have
∂2φ(α,β,γ)=αφ(β,γ)−φ(αβ,γ)+φ(α,βγ)−φ(α,β)γ
=σ(α)φ(β,γ)−φ(αβ,γ)+φ(α,βγ)−φ(α,β)σ(γ)
=σ(α)(σ(βγ)−σ(β)σ(γ))−σ(αβγ)+σ(αβ)σ(γ)+σ(αβγ)
−σ(α)σ(βγ)−(σ(αβ)−σ(α)σ(β))σ(γ)
By Theorem 3 of VIII, p. 242, the K-module H2(A,r) is reduced to zero. Hence there exists an element ψ of C1(A,r) such that ∂1ψ=φ, in other words, such that we have
(21) φ(α,β)=αψ(β)−ψ(αβ)+ψ(α)β for α,β in A.
We have ψ(α)ψ(β)=0 because r2 is zero; from (19) and (20), we then deduce (22) (σ+ψ)(αβ)=(σ+ψ)(α)(σ+ψ)(β),
so that the K-linear section σ+ψ of π belongs to Σ. Its image is a subalgebra S of A such that A=S+r.
Let us now prove the existence of S in the general case. We reason by induction on the least integer p⩾1 such that rp=0; the case p=1 is trivial. Suppose p⩾2, and set A′=A/rp−1. The radical r′ of A′ is equal to r/rp−1 (Proposition 5 of VIII, p. 155), so satisfies r′p−1=0, and the algebra A′/r′ is isomorphic to A=A/r and is therefore absolutely semisimple. By the induction hypothesis, there exists a subalgebra S′ of A′ such that A′=S′⊕r′. Then S′ is of the form A′′/rp−1, where A′′ is a subalgebra of A containing rp−1, and we have
A=A′′+r,rp−1=A′′∩r(23)
The algebra A′′/rp−1 is isomorphic to A′/r′; we have (rp−1)2=0, so rp−1 is the radical of A′′. By the case we just treated, there exists a subalgebra S of A′′ such that A′′=S⊕rp−1; we deduce the relation A=S⊕r from (23).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.