Theorem 7
Tag 00HB, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00HB].
Algebra, VIII, p. 268, § 14. Central Simple Algebras
Let A be a central simple K-algebra of finite degree and L a subalgebra of A. The following properties are equivalent:
(i) The algebra L is a maximal étale subalgebra of A.
(ii) There exist an extension of K, an integer , and an isomorphism from to that sends to the set of diagonal matrices.
(iii) There exist , and as in (ii), where the extension is, moreover, assumed Galois and of finite degree.
It is clear that (iii) implies (ii).
If property (ii) holds, then is a maximal commutative subalgebra of (Proposition 6), and it is diagonalizable. The K-algebra L is then étale (V, §6, No. 3, p. 28, Definition 1), and it is a maximal commutative subalgebra of A (VIII, p. 261, Lemma 3, b)). We have proved that (ii) implies (i).
Suppose that property (i) holds. Since L is étale over K, by Proposition 7, there exists a Galois extension of K of finite degree such that the -algebra is diagonalizable. The algebra A is central simple; by (VIII, p. 252, Theorem 1), there exist a Galois extension , a vector space V of finite dimension over , and an isomorphism from to End. By Proposition 1 of V, p. 55, we may assume . By Proposition 4, b) of VIII, p. 264 and Lemma 3, b) of VIII, p. 261 is a maximal commutative subalgebra of , so is a maximal commutative subalgebra of End. Let us apply Proposition 6 to the diagonalizable algebra there exists a basis of over such that consists of the endomorphisms of with diagonal matrix with respect to this basis. So (i) implies (iii).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
- V, §6, No. 3, p. 28, Definition 1 not in this corpus
- Proposition 1 of V, p. 55 not in this corpus
- Lemma 3, b) of VIII, p. 261
- VIII, p. 261, Lemma 3
- Proposition 4, b) of VIII, p. 264
- Proposition 6
- Proposition 7
- VIII, p. 252, Theorem 1