Bourbaki

Lemma 2

Tag 00HZ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00HZ].

Algebra, VIII, p. 279, § 15. Brauer Groups

Let I and J be finite sets, kk be a commutative ring, and A and B be kk-algebras. Denote by MI(A)\mathbf{M}_I(A) the kk-algebra of square matrices of type (I,I)(I,I) with entries in A, and define the kk-algebras MJ(B)\mathbf{M}_J(B) and MI×J(A⊗KB)\mathbf{M}_{I\times J}(A\otimes_KB) likewise. There exists a unique kk-algebra isomorphism

φ:MI(A)⊗kMJ(B)⟶MI×J(A⊗kB) \varphi :\mathbf{M}_I(A)\otimes_k\mathbf{M}_J(B)\longrightarrow \mathbf{M}_{I\times J}(A\otimes_kB)

such that φ((aii′)⊗(bjj′))\varphi ((a_{ii'})\otimes (b_{jj'})) is the matrix with entry of index ((i,j),(i′,j′))((i, j),(i', j')) equal to aii′⊗bjj′a_{ii'}\otimes b_{jj'}.

The existence of a kk-linear bijection φ\varphi with the property stated in the lemma follows from the compatibility of the tensor product with direct sums (II, §3, No. 7, p. 255, Proposition 7). The fact that φ\varphi is an algebra homomorphism follows from the definition of a product matrix.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

  • II, §3, No. 7, p. 255, Proposition 7 not in this corpus
Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.