Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 00I0, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00I0].

Algebra, VIII, p. 279, § 15. Brauer Groups

Let A and B be central simple K-algebras of finite degree. The following properties are equivalent:

(i) We have [A] = [B] in the Brauer group Br(K).

(ii) There exists an integer t⩾1t\geqslant 1 such that the K-algebra A⊗KBoA\otimes_KB^o is isomorphic to the matrix algebra Mt(K)\mathbf{M}_t(K).

(iii) There exist strictly positive integers rr and ss such that the K-algebras A⊗KMr(K)A\otimes_K\mathbf{M}_r(K) and B⊗KMs(K)B\otimes_K\mathbf{M}_s(K) are isomorphic.

(iv) There exist a field D containing K and integers m⩾1m\geqslant 1 and n⩾1n\geqslant 1 such that A is isomorphic to Mm(D)\mathbf{M}_m(D) and B to Mn(D)\mathbf{M}_n(D).

(v) The K-algebras A and B are Morita equivalent.

Suppose that we have [A] = [B]. Since [Bo][B^o] is the inverse of [B] in the Brauer group, we have [K]=[B][Bo]=[A][Bo]=[A⊗KBo][K] = [B][B^o] = [A][B^o] = [A\otimes_KB^o]. By Lemma 1, there exists an integer t⩾1t\geqslant 1 such that the algebras A⊗KBoA\otimes_KB^o and Mt(K)\mathbf{M}_t(K) are isomorphic. So (i) implies (ii).

Suppose that (ii) holds. Since Bo⊗KBB^o\otimes_KB is isomorphic to a matrix algebra Ms(K)\mathbf{M}_s(K) with s⩾1s\geqslant 1 (VIII, p. 252, Theorem 1), the algebra A⊗KBo⊗KBA\otimes_KB^o\otimes_KB is isomorphic to A⊗KMsA\otimes_K\mathbf{M}_s(K), on the one hand, and to Mt(K)⊗KB\mathbf{M}_t(K)\otimes_KB, on the other. So property (ii) implies property (iii).

Suppose that (iii) holds. By Wedderburn’s theorem (VIII, p. 120, Theorem 1), there exist integers m⩾1m\geqslant 1 and n⩾1n\geqslant 1 and fields D and D′D' of finite degree over K with center K such that A is isomorphic to Mm(D)\mathbf{M}_m(D) and B to Mn(D′)\mathbf{M}_n(D'). Then the algebra A⊗KMr(K)A\otimes_K\mathbf{M}_r(K) is isomorphic to Mmr\mathbf{M}_{mr}(D), and the algebra B⊗KMr′(K)B\otimes_K\mathbf{M}_{r'}(K) is isomorphic to Mnr′(D′)\mathbf{M}_{nr'}(D') (Lemma 2). By Corollary 2 of VIII, p. 121, the K-algebras D and D′D' are isomorphic. So (iii) implies (iv).

Suppose that (iv) holds. The algebras A and D are Morita equivalent, as are the algebras B and D (VIII, p. 114, Example 2). Therefore, A and B are Morita equivalent, so (iv) implies (v).

Finally, the implication (v)⇒\Rightarrow(i) is the definition of the set Br(K).

When the equivalent properties of the proposition hold, we say that the algebras A and B are similar.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.