Proposition 3
Tag 00I0, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00I0].
Algebra, VIII, p. 279, § 15. Brauer Groups
Let A and B be central simple K-algebras of finite degree. The following properties are equivalent:
(i) We have [A] = [B] in the Brauer group Br(K).
(ii) There exists an integer such that the K-algebra is isomorphic to the matrix algebra .
(iii) There exist strictly positive integers and such that the K-algebras and are isomorphic.
(iv) There exist a field D containing K and integers and such that A is isomorphic to and B to .
(v) The K-algebras A and B are Morita equivalent.
Suppose that we have [A] = [B]. Since is the inverse of [B] in the Brauer group, we have . By Lemma 1, there exists an integer such that the algebras and are isomorphic. So (i) implies (ii).
Suppose that (ii) holds. Since is isomorphic to a matrix algebra with (VIII, p. 252, Theorem 1), the algebra is isomorphic to (K), on the one hand, and to , on the other. So property (ii) implies property (iii).
Suppose that (iii) holds. By Wedderburn’s theorem (VIII, p. 120, Theorem 1), there exist integers and and fields D and of finite degree over K with center K such that A is isomorphic to and B to . Then the algebra is isomorphic to (D), and the algebra is isomorphic to (Lemma 2). By Corollary 2 of VIII, p. 121, the K-algebras D and are isomorphic. So (iii) implies (iv).
Suppose that (iv) holds. The algebras A and D are Morita equivalent, as are the algebras B and D (VIII, p. 114, Example 2). Therefore, A and B are Morita equivalent, so (iv) implies (v).
Finally, the implication (v)(i) is the definition of the set Br(K).
When the equivalent properties of the proposition hold, we say that the algebras A and B are similar.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.