Remark 1
Tag 00IY, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00IY].
Algebra, VIII, p. 306, § 16. Other Descriptions of the Brauer Group
Let G be a group, H a subgroup of G, and N a subgroup of H. Let E be a , N)-algebra. Let be an element of . We have the relation
for every , and and the relations
for all and every . Consequently, for every and . We can therefore consider the mapping
defined by the relation for in and in G. The mapping is an algebra isomorphism from Coind(Coind) to Coind whose inverse sends an element from to the mapping defined by the relation for and .
We now suppose given a finite group G and a reduced (V, §6, No. 6, p. 32) commutative K-algebra L of finite degree endowed with an action of G given by a homomorphism from G to Aut. For and , we denote by the transform of under the automorphism of L. Let be the set of maximal ideals of L; we denote by the transform of an element of under the automorphism of L. It is an element of . For every in , the field is a finite extension of K. We write for the projection and denote by the stabilizer of in G, that is, the set of such that . The K-algebra is endowed with an action of through the homomorphism from to Aut that sends an element of to the automorphism of deduced from when passing to the quotients.
Let be the set of orbits of G in . Given an orbit , set and . Since is invariant under G, by passing to the quotients, the action of G on L defines a homomorphism from G to Aut. Finally, denote by the canonical mapping from L to .
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.