Theorem 6
Tag 00JR, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00JR].
Algebra, VIII, p. 322, § 16. Other Descriptions of the Brauer Group
Let K be a commutative field, and let A be a central simple A-algebra of finite degree over K. Let L be a separable extension of K of finite degree that is a splitting field for the algebra A. Then [L : K][A] is zero in Br(K).
There exists an extension M of L that is a Galois extension of K of finite degree (V, §10, No. 1, p. 57, Proposition 2). The class [A] of A in the Brauer group of K belongs to the subgroup Br(M). Let G be the Galois group of M over K, and let be the image of [A] in (VIII, p. 321, Corollary). Let H be the Galois group of M over L. Then H is a subgroup of index [L : K] in G (V, §10, No. 7, p. 68, Corollary 5). Since Res (Proposition 14), we have Res. By Proposition 8 of VIII, p. 303, it follows that , and consequently [L : K][A] = 0.
Let K be a commutative field, and let A be a central simple algebra of finite degree over K. Then A is isomorphic to an algebra of the form (D), where D is a field with center K, and [A] = [D] in Br(K). The reduced degree of D depends only on A. We call this reduced degree the index of A. The index of A divides the reduced degree of A. The exponent of A is the order of the class of A in the Brauer group of K.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Cites
- V, §10, No. 7, p. 68, Corollary 5 not in this corpus
- V, §10, No. 1, p. 57, Proposition 2 not in this corpus
- VIII, p. 321
- Proposition 14
- Proposition 8 of VIII, p. 303