Bourbaki

Definition 1

Tag 00MD, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00MD].

Algebra, VIII, p. 373, § 20. Linear Representations of Algebras

Let M be a K-module. A linear representation of the algebra A in M is a K-homomorphism π\pi from A to the algebra EndK(M)_K(M).

We also say that the pair (M,π)(M, \pi ) is a linear representation of the algebra A. When M is a free K-module, the dimension of M is called the degree (or dimension) of π\pi.

Let π\pi be a linear representation of A in M. The additive law on M and the external law (a,x)↦π(a)(x)(a, x)\mapsto \pi (a)(x) define a left A-module structure on M, which we denote by MπM_{\pi}. We say that MπM_{\pi} is the module of the representation π\pi. The K-module structure on M is obtained from the A-module structure on MπM_{\pi} by restriction of scalars.

Conversely, let E be a left A-module. Let M be the K-module deduced from E by restriction of scalars from A to K, and let π\pi be the homomorphism a↦aEa\mapsto a_E from A to EndK(M)_K(M). Then π\pi is a representation of A in M, and we have E=MπE = M_{\pi}. We say that π\pi is the linear representation associated with the A-module E.

Studying A-modules or linear representations of A amounts to the same. We will translate certain definitions concerning modules to the language of linear representations.

Let π\pi be a linear representation of A in M. The kernel of the homomorphism π\pi is a two-sided ideal of A, which is simply the annihilator of the A-module MπM_{\pi}. The homomorphism π\pi is injective if and only if the A-module MπM_{\pi} is faithful; we then say that π\pi is a faithful representation of A.

Let (M,π)(M, \pi ) and (M′,π′)(M', \pi ') be linear representations of A. An A-linear mapping from MπM_{\pi} to Mπ′′M'_{\pi'} is a K-linear mapping u:M→M′u: M\rightarrow M' that satisfies the relation

π′(a)∘u=u∘π(a)(1) \pi '(a)\circ u=u\circ \pi (a) \tag{1}

for a∈Aa\in A. An isomorphism from MπM_{\pi} to Mπ′′M'_{\pi'} is an isomorphism of K-modules u:M→M′u: M\rightarrow M' satisfying the condition

π′(a)=u∘π(a)∘u−1(2) \pi '(a) =u\circ \pi (a)\circ u^{-1} \tag{2}

for a∈Aa\in A. We say that π\pi and π′\pi ' are isomorphic if the A-modules MπM_{\pi} and Mπ′′M'_{\pi'} are isomorphic. We say that π\pi is a subrepresentation (resp. a quotient representation) of π′\pi ' if MπM_{\pi} is a submodule (resp. a quotient module) of Mπ′′M'_{\pi'}.

Suppose given a family (Mi,πi)(M_i, \pi_i) of linear representations of A. Let M be the K-module that is the direct sum of the MiM_i; for any a∈Aa\in A, let π(a)\pi (a) be the endomorphism (xi)i∈I↦(πi(a)(xi))i∈I(x_i)_{i\in I}\mapsto (\pi_i(a)(x_i))_{i\in I} of M. Then π\pi is a linear representation of A in M. The A-module MπM_{\pi} is the direct sum of the A-modules (Mi)π(i∈I)(M_i)_{\pi}(i\in I); we say that π\pi is the direct sum of the πi\pi_i, and we write π=⨁πii\pi =\bigoplus\pi_{i^i}.

We say that the representation π\pi of A in M is simple or irreducible if the A-module MπM_{\pi} is simple; we say that the representation π\pi of A on M is semisimple or completely reducible if the A-module MπM_{\pi} is semisimple.

Let π\pi be a linear representation of A in M. Let M∗M^* be the K-module dual to M. The mapping a↦t(π(a))a\mapsto^t(\pi (a)) from AoA^o to EndK(M∗)_K(M^*) is the transposed representation of π\pi.

Let L be a commutative K-algebra, and let (M,π)(M, \pi ) be a linear representation of the K-algebra A. The homomorphism π(L):A(L)→\pi_{(L)}: A_{(L)}\rightarrow EndL(M(L))_L(M_{(L)}) corresponding to the A(L)A_{(L)}-module structure on M(L)M_{(L)} is a linear representation of the L-algebra A(L)A_{(L)}. We say that π(L)\pi_{(L)} is the linear representation of the algebra A(L)A_{(L)} deduced from the representation π\pi by extending the ring of scalars K to L.

Suppose that K is a field and that L is a nonzero commutative K-algebra.

Let π\pi and π′\pi ' be linear representations of the algebra A. It follows from VIII, p. 37, Theorem 3 that the representations π\pi and π′\pi ' are isomorphic if and only if π(L)\pi_{(L)} and π(L)′\pi '_{(L)} are.

Suppose that K is a field. Let L be an extension of K. Consider the Grothendieck group RK(A)R_K(A) (resp. RL(A(L))R_L(A_{(L)})) of the A-modules that are finite-dimensional over K (resp. of the A(L)A_{(L)}-modules that are finite-dimensional over L). We have seen that the group homomorphism

u:RK(A)⟶RL(A(L)) u: R_K(A)\longrightarrow R_L(A_{(L)})

defined by extension of scalars is injective; moreover, an element ξ∈RK(A)\xi \in R_K(A) is effective if and only if u(ξ)u(\xi ) is (VIII, p. 195, Theorem 1).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.