Definition 1
Tag 00MD, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00MD].
Algebra, VIII, p. 373, § 20. Linear Representations of Algebras
Let M be a K-module. A linear representation of the algebra A in M is a K-homomorphism from A to the algebra End.
We also say that the pair is a linear representation of the algebra A. When M is a free K-module, the dimension of M is called the degree (or dimension) of .
Let be a linear representation of A in M. The additive law on M and the external law define a left A-module structure on M, which we denote by . We say that is the module of the representation . The K-module structure on M is obtained from the A-module structure on by restriction of scalars.
Conversely, let E be a left A-module. Let M be the K-module deduced from E by restriction of scalars from A to K, and let be the homomorphism from A to End. Then is a representation of A in M, and we have . We say that is the linear representation associated with the A-module E.
Studying A-modules or linear representations of A amounts to the same. We will translate certain definitions concerning modules to the language of linear representations.
Let be a linear representation of A in M. The kernel of the homomorphism is a two-sided ideal of A, which is simply the annihilator of the A-module . The homomorphism is injective if and only if the A-module is faithful; we then say that is a faithful representation of A.
Let and be linear representations of A. An A-linear mapping from to is a K-linear mapping that satisfies the relation
for . An isomorphism from to is an isomorphism of K-modules satisfying the condition
for . We say that and are isomorphic if the A-modules and are isomorphic. We say that is a subrepresentation (resp. a quotient representation) of if is a submodule (resp. a quotient module) of .
Suppose given a family of linear representations of A. Let M be the K-module that is the direct sum of the ; for any , let be the endomorphism of M. Then is a linear representation of A in M. The A-module is the direct sum of the A-modules ; we say that is the direct sum of the , and we write .
We say that the representation of A in M is simple or irreducible if the A-module is simple; we say that the representation of A on M is semisimple or completely reducible if the A-module is semisimple.
Let be a linear representation of A in M. Let be the K-module dual to M. The mapping from to End is the transposed representation of .
Let L be a commutative K-algebra, and let be a linear representation of the K-algebra A. The homomorphism End corresponding to the -module structure on is a linear representation of the L-algebra . We say that is the linear representation of the algebra deduced from the representation by extending the ring of scalars K to L.
Suppose that K is a field and that L is a nonzero commutative K-algebra.
Let and be linear representations of the algebra A. It follows from VIII, p. 37, Theorem 3 that the representations and are isomorphic if and only if and are.
Suppose that K is a field. Let L be an extension of K. Consider the Grothendieck group (resp. ) of the A-modules that are finite-dimensional over K (resp. of the -modules that are finite-dimensional over L). We have seen that the group homomorphism
defined by extension of scalars is injective; moreover, an element is effective if and only if is (VIII, p. 195, Theorem 1).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.