Bourbaki

Corollary (Frobenius reciprocity)

Tag 00S7, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00S7].

Algebra, VIII, p. 202, § 11. Grothendieck Groups

Suppose that A and B are semisimple algebras that are finite-dimensional over a commutative field K and that ff is K-linear. Then the K-vector spaces S, T, D, E, and H are finite-dimensional, and we have the equalities

[f∗(T):S][D:K]=[f∗(S):T][E:K]=[H:K](21) [f_*(T) : S][D : K] = [f^*(S) : T][E : K] = [H : K] \tag{21}

In particular, when K is algebraically closed, we have D = E = K and

[f∗(T):S]=[f∗(S):T]=[H:K](22) [f_*(T) : S] = [f^*(S) : T] = [H : K] \tag{22}

Since A-module S is simple, it is monogenous, and D is a linear subspace of HomK(S,S)_K(S,S); hence S and D are finite-dimensional over K. For an analogous reason, T and E are finite-dimensional over K. Finally, H is a linear subspace of HomK(S,T)_K(S,T); it is therefore also finite-dimensional. Formula (21) then follows from Proposition 11 because the dimension of H over K is equal to [H : D][D : K] and to [H : E][E : K] (II, §1, No. 13, p. 222, Proposition 25). By Theorem 1 of VIII, p. 47, if K is algebraically closed, we have D = E = K. The second part of the corollary then follows from the first.

Let A and B be semisimple algebras that are finite-dimensional over a commutative field K, and let ff be a homomorphism of K-algebras from A to B.

Let S(A)\mathscr{S}(A) be the set of classes of simple A-modules; for every λ∈S\lambda \in \mathscr{S} (A), let SλS_{\lambda} be a module of class λ\lambda and DλD_{\lambda} its centralizer. Then DλD_{\lambda} is an algebra of finite degree over K; we denote this degree by dλd_{\lambda}. We define S\mathscr{S}(B), TμT_\mu, EμE_\mu, and eμe_\mu for μ\mu in S(B)\mathscr{S}(B) analogously. The Grothendieck group K0(A)K_0(A) has the family ([Sλ])λ∈S(A)([S_{\lambda}])_{\lambda\in\mathscr{S}(A)} as a basis, and K0(B)K_0(B) has ([Tμ])μ∈S(B)([T_\mu])_{\mu\in\mathscr{S}(B)} as a basis. Let (aμλ)(a_{\mu\lambda}) be the matrix of f∗:K0(A)→K0(B)f^*: K_0(A)\rightarrow K_0(B) and (bλμ)(b_{\lambda \mu}) the matrix of f∗:K0(B)→K0(A)f_*: K_0(B)\rightarrow K_0(A) with respect to these bases. By definition, we have

aμλ=[f∗(Sλ):Tμ],bλμ=[f∗(Tμ):Sλ](23) a_{\mu\lambda}= [f^*(S_{\lambda}) : T_\mu],b_{\lambda \mu}= [f_*(T_\mu) : S_{\lambda}] \tag{23}

for λ\lambda in S(A)\mathscr{S}(A) and μ\mu in S(B)\mathscr{S}(B). We denote the dimension of the vector space HomA(Sλ,f∗(Tμ))_A(S_{\lambda}, f_*(T_\mu)) over the field K by hλμh_{\lambda \mu}. By the corollary above, we have

hλμ=eμaμλ=dλbλμ(24) h_{\lambda \mu}=e_\mu a_{\mu\lambda}=d_{\lambda}b_{\lambda \mu} \tag{24}

When the field K is algebraically closed, we have dλ=eμ=1d_{\lambda}=e_\mu= 1; consequently, we have

aμλ=bλμ=hλμ(25) a_{\mu\lambda}=b_{\lambda \mu}=h_{\lambda \mu} \tag{25}

In other words, the matrices of f∗f_* and f∗f^* with respect to the given bases of K0(A)K_0(A) and K0(B)K_0(B) are each other’s transposes.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.