Bourbaki

Proposition 2

Tag 00XZ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00XZ].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VIII, § 1. The Lie algebra sl(2, k) and its representations

If the submodule V of E generated by the primitive element ee is finite dimensional, then:

(i) the weight λ\lambda of ee is integral and equal to dim V−1V-1;

(ii) (e0,e1,...,eλ)(e_0, e_1, . . . , e_{\lambda}) is a basis of V, and en=0e_n= 0 for n>λn > \lambda;

(iii) the eigenvalues of HVH_V are λ,λ−2,λ−4,...,−λ\lambda , \lambda -2, \lambda -4, . . . ,-\lambda; they are all of multiplicity 1;

(iv) every primitive element of V is proportional to ee;

(v) the commutant of the module V is reduced to the scalars; in particular, V is absolutely simple.

Let mm be the largest integer such that em≠0e_m\not= 0. Then 0=X+em+1=0 =X_+e_{m+1}= (λ−m)em(\lambda -m)e_m, so λ=m\lambda =m; since (e0,e1,...,em)(e_0, e_1, . . . , e_m) is a basis of V, this proves (i) and (ii). Assertion (iii) follows from the equality Hen=(λ−2n)enHe_n= (\lambda -2n)e_n. We have X+en≠0X_+e_n\not= 0 for 1≤n≤m1\leq n\leq m, hence (iv). Let cc be an element of the commutant of the module V. Then Hc(e)=cH(e)=λc(e)Hc(e) =cH(e) =\lambda c(e), so there exists μ∈k\mu\in k such that c(e)=μec(e) =\mu e; then

cX−qe=X−qce=μX−qe cX_-^qe=X_-^qce=\mu X_-^qe

for all q≥0q\geq 0, so c=μ.1c=\mu.1, proving (v).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.