Bourbaki

Theorem 1

Tag 013G, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 013G].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VIII, § 7. Finite dimensional modules over a split semi-simple Lie algebra

A simple g\mathfrak{g}-module is finite dimensional if and only if it has a highest weight belonging to P++P_{++}.

We denote by V a simple g\mathfrak{g}-module and by X\mathscr{X} its set of weights.

a) Assume that V is finite dimensional. Then X\mathscr{X} is finite and non-empty (Prop. 1) and so has a maximal element ω\omega. Let α∈B\alpha \in B. Then ω+α∉X\omega +\alpha \notin \mathscr{X}, which proves that ω\omega is the highest weight of V (§6, no. 2, Lemma 2). On the other hand, there exists a homomorphism from sl(2,k)\mathfrak{s}\mathfrak{l}(2, k) to g\mathfrak{g} that takes HH to HαH_{\alpha}; by §1, Prop. 2 (i), ω(Hα)\omega (H_{\alpha}) is an integer ≥0\geq 0, so ω∈P++\omega \in P_{++}.

b) Assume that V has a highest weight ω∈P++\omega \in P_{++}. Let α∈B\alpha \in B and let ee be a primitive element of weight ω\omega in V. Put ej=X−αjee_j=X_{-\alpha}^je for j≥0j\geq 0,

m=ω(Hα)∈Nm=\omega (H_{\alpha})\in \mathbf{N}, and N = ∑j=0mkej\sum_{j=0}^mke_j. By §1, no. 2, Prop. 1,Xαem+11,X_{\alpha}e_{m+1} = 0.

If β∈B\beta \in B and β≠α\beta \not=\alpha, then [Xβ,X−α]=0[X_{\beta}, X_{-\alpha}] = 0 so Xβem+1=XβX−αm+1eX_{\beta}e_{m+1}=X_{\beta}X_{-\alpha}^{m+1}e = X−αm+1Xβe=0X_{-\alpha}^{m+1}X_{\beta}e= 0. If em+1≠0e_{m+1}\not= 0, we conclude that em+1e_{m+1} is primitive, which is absurd (§6, Prop. 3 (i)); so em+1=0e_{m+1}= 0. Thus, by §1, no. 2, Cor. of Prop. 1, N is stable under the subalgebra sα\mathfrak{s}_{\alpha} generated by Hα,XαH_{\alpha}, X_{\alpha} and X−αX_{-\alpha}. Now sα\mathfrak{s}_{\alpha} is reductive in g\mathfrak{g}, so the sum of the finite dimensional subspaces of V that are stable under sα\mathfrak{s}_{\alpha} is a g\mathfrak{g}-submodule of V (Chap. I, §6, no. 6, Prop. 7); since this sum is non-zero, it is equal to V. It follows from this that (Xα)V(X_{\alpha})_V and (X−α)V(X_{-\alpha})_V are locally nilpotent. In view of Lemma 1 (ii), X\mathscr{X} is stable under sαs_{\alpha}, and this holds for all α\alpha. Hence X\mathscr{X} is stable under W. Now every orbit of W on P meets P++P_{++} (Chap. VI, §1, no. 10). On the other hand, if λ∈X∩P++\lambda \in \mathscr{X}\cap P_{++}, then λ=ω−∑α∈Bnαα=∑α∈Bnα′α\lambda =\omega -\sum_{\alpha\in B}n_{\alpha}\alpha =\sum_{\alpha\in B}n'_{\alpha}\alpha with nα∈Nn_{\alpha}\in \mathbf{N} and nα′≥0n'_{\alpha}\geq 0 for all α∈B\alpha \in B

(Chap. V, §3, no. 5, Lemma 6). So X∩P++\mathscr{X}\cap P_{++} is finite and hence so is X\mathscr{X}. Since each weight has finite multiplicity (§6, no. 1, Prop. 1 (ii)), V is finite dimensional.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.