Bourbaki

Proposition 11

Tag 01C8, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01C8].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter IX, § 4. Root system associated to a compact group

The homomorphism f(G,T):Γ(T)→π1(G)f(G,T) :\Gamma (T)\rightarrow \pi_1(G) is surjective. Its kernel is the subgroup N(G,T)N(G,T) of Γ(T)\Gamma (T) generated by the family of nodal vectors (Kα)α∈R(G,T)(K_{\alpha})_{\alpha\in R(G,T)}.

The homomorphism f(G,T)f(G,T) is surjective by Prop. 3 (§2, no. 4). We denote by A(G,T)A(G,T) the assertion: “the kernel of f(G,T)f(G,T) is generated by the KαK_{\alpha}” which it remains to prove, and distinguish several cases:

a)Ga) G is simply-connected. Let ρ:gC→gl(V)\rho :\mathfrak{g}_{\mathbf{C}}\rightarrow \mathfrak{g}\mathfrak{l}(V) be a linear representation of gC\mathfrak{g}_{\mathbf{C}} on a finite dimensional complex vector space V. Restricting to g\mathfrak{g}, we obtain a representation of g\mathfrak{g} on the real vector space V(R)V_{(\mathbf{R})}; since G is simply-connected, there exists an analytic linear representation π\pi of G on V(R)V_{(\mathbf{R})} such that ρ=L(π)\rho = L(\pi ). It follows from Prop. 7 of no. 3 that the image δ(X(T))\delta (X(T)) of X(T) in tC∗\mathfrak{t}^*_{\mathbf{C}} contains all the weights of ρ\rho on V. This being true for every representation ρ\rho of gC\mathfrak{g}_{\mathbf{C}}, it follows from Chap. VIII, §7, no. 2, Th. 1 that δ(X(T))\delta (X(T)) contains the group of weights of δ\delta(R), which is by definition the set of λ∈tC∗\lambda \in \mathfrak{t}^*_{\mathbf{C}} such that λ(Hδ(α))∈Z\lambda (H_{\delta(\alpha)})\in \mathbf{Z} for all α∈R\alpha \in R, in other words, λ(Kα)∈2πiZ\lambda (K_{\alpha})\in 2\pi i\mathbf{Z} for all α∈R\alpha \in R. Thus, the group X(T) contains all the elements λ\lambda of X(T)⊗QX(T)\otimes \mathbf{Q} such that ⟨λ,Kα⟩∈Z\langle \lambda , K_{\alpha}\rangle \in \mathbf{Z} for all α∈R\alpha \in R, which implies by duality that Γ(T)\Gamma (T) is generated by the KαK_{\alpha}, hence the assertion A(G,T)A(G,T).

b)Gb) G is the direct product of a simply-connected group G′G' and a torus S. Then T is the direct product of a maximal torus T′T' of G′G' with S,Γ(T)S,\Gamma (T) can be identified with Γ(T′)×Γ\Gamma (T')\times \Gamma(S), π1(G)\pi_1(G) with π1(G′)×π1\pi_1(G')\times \pi_1(S), and f(G,T)f(G,T) with the homomorphisms with components f(G′,T′)f(G',T') and f(S,S)f(S,S). Since f(S,S)f(S,S) is bijective, the canonical map Γ(T′)→Γ(T)\Gamma (T')\rightarrow \Gamma (T) maps Ker f(G′,T′)f(G',T') bijectively onto Ker f(G,T)f(G,T). Moreover, the KαK_{\alpha} belong to the Lie algebra of the derived group G′G' of G, hence to the image of Γ(T′)\Gamma (T'), so it is immediate that A(G′,T′)A(G',T') implies A(G,T)A(G,T), hence assertion A(G,T)A(G,T), in view of a).

c) General case. There exists a surjective morphism p:G′→Gp: G'\rightarrow G with finite kernel, where G′G' is the direct product of a simply-connected group by a torus (§1, no. 4, Prop. 4). If T′T' is the inverse image of T in G′G' (this is a maximal torus of G′G' by §2, no. 3, Prop. 1), and N the kernel of pp, we have exact sequences 0→N→G′→G→00\rightarrow N\rightarrow G'\rightarrow G\rightarrow 0 and 0→N→T′→T→00\rightarrow N\rightarrow T'\rightarrow T\rightarrow 0, hence a commutative diagram with exact rows (no. 2, Remark 1 and General Topology, Chap. XI, in preparation)

0 ⟶Γ(T′)⟶Γ(T)⟶\longrightarrow \Gamma (T')\longrightarrow \Gamma (T)\longrightarrow N ⟶\longrightarrow 0

f(G′,T′)f(G,T)f(G',T')f(G,T) IdN_N

0 ⟶π1(G′)⟶π1(G)⟶\longrightarrow \pi_1(G')\longrightarrow \pi_1(G)\longrightarrow N ⟶0\longrightarrow 0.

It follows immediately from the snake diagram (Algebra, Chap. X, p. 4, Prop. 2) that A(G′,T′)A(G',T') implies A(G,T)A(G,T), hence the proposition, in view of b).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.