Proposition 11
Tag 01C8, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01C8].
Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter IX, § 4. Root system associated to a compact group
The homomorphism is surjective. Its kernel is the subgroup of generated by the family of nodal vectors .
The homomorphism is surjective by Prop. 3 (§2, no. 4). We denote by the assertion: “the kernel of is generated by the ” which it remains to prove, and distinguish several cases:
is simply-connected. Let be a linear representation of on a finite dimensional complex vector space V. Restricting to , we obtain a representation of on the real vector space ; since G is simply-connected, there exists an analytic linear representation of G on such that . It follows from Prop. 7 of no. 3 that the image of X(T) in contains all the weights of on V. This being true for every representation of , it follows from Chap. VIII, §7, no. 2, Th. 1 that contains the group of weights of (R), which is by definition the set of such that for all , in other words, for all . Thus, the group X(T) contains all the elements of such that for all , which implies by duality that is generated by the , hence the assertion .
is the direct product of a simply-connected group and a torus S. Then T is the direct product of a maximal torus of with can be identified with (S), with (S), and with the homomorphisms with components and . Since is bijective, the canonical map maps Ker bijectively onto Ker . Moreover, the belong to the Lie algebra of the derived group of G, hence to the image of , so it is immediate that implies , hence assertion , in view of a).
c) General case. There exists a surjective morphism with finite kernel, where is the direct product of a simply-connected group by a torus (§1, no. 4, Prop. 4). If is the inverse image of T in (this is a maximal torus of by §2, no. 3, Prop. 1), and N the kernel of , we have exact sequences and , hence a commutative diagram with exact rows (no. 2, Remark 1 and General Topology, Chap. XI, in preparation)
0 N 0
Id
0 N .
It follows immediately from the snake diagram (Algebra, Chap. X, p. 4, Prop. 2) that implies , hence the proposition, in view of b).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Cites
- Algebra, Chap. X, p. 4, Prop. 2 not in this corpus: A X
- §1, no. 4, Prop. 4
- §2, no. 3, Prop. 1
- Prop. 3 (§2, no. 4)
- no. 2, Remark 1
- Prop. 7
- Chap. VIII, §7, no. 2, Th. 1