Bourbaki

Lemma 7

Tag 0114, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0114].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VIII, § 4. Split semi-simple Lie algebra defined by a reduced root system

The ideal n\mathfrak{n} of a+\mathfrak{a}_+ generated by the xαβ(α,β∈B,α≠β)x_{\alpha \beta}(\alpha , \beta \in B, \alpha \not=\beta ) is an ideal of a\mathfrak{a}. The ideal of a−\mathfrak{a}_- generated by the yαβ(α,β∈B,α≠β)y_{\alpha \beta}(\alpha , \beta \in B, \alpha \not=\beta ) is an ideal of a\mathfrak{a} and is equal to θ(n)\theta (\mathfrak{n}).

Let n′=∑α,β∈B,α≠βkxαβ\mathfrak{n}'=\sum_{\alpha ,\beta\in B,\alpha\not=\beta}kx_{\alpha \beta}. Since each xαβx_{\alpha \beta} is homogeneous in a,[a0,n′]⊂n′\mathfrak{a}, [\mathfrak{a}^0,\mathfrak{n}']\subset \mathfrak{n}'

(Lemma 5 and Prop. 2). Let U (resp. V) be the enveloping algebra of a\mathfrak{a} (resp. a+\mathfrak{a}_+), and σ\sigma the representation of U on a\mathfrak{a} defined by the adjoint representation of a\mathfrak{a}. The ideal of a\mathfrak{a} generated by n′\mathfrak{n}' is σ(U)n′\sigma (U)\mathfrak{n}'. Now a=a++a0+a−\mathfrak{a}=\mathfrak{a}_++\mathfrak{a}^0+\mathfrak{a}_- (Prop. 22),σ(a−)n′=0,\sigma (\mathfrak{a}_-)\mathfrak{n}'= 0 (Lemma 6), and σ(a0)n′⊂n′\sigma (\mathfrak{a}^0)\mathfrak{n}'\subset \mathfrak{n}' by the preceding. By the Poincaré-Birkhoff-Witt theorem, σ(U)n′=σ(V)n′\sigma (U)\mathfrak{n}'=\sigma (V)\mathfrak{n}', which proves the first assertion of the lemma. It follows that the ideal of θ(a+)=a−\theta (\mathfrak{a}_+) =\mathfrak{a}_- generated by the θ(xαβ)=yαβ(α,β∈B,α≠β)\theta (x_{\alpha \beta}) =y_{\alpha \beta}(\alpha , \beta \in B, \alpha \not=\beta ) is the ideal θ(n)\theta (\mathfrak{n}) of a\mathfrak{a}. Q.E.D.

The ideal n+θ(n)\mathfrak{n}+\theta (\mathfrak{n}) of a\mathfrak{a} is graded since it is generated by homogeneous elements. Consequently, the Lie algebra a/(n+θ(n))\mathfrak{a}/(\mathfrak{n}+\theta (\mathfrak{n})) is a Q-graded Lie algebra; in the remainder of this paragraph, it is denoted by gB\mathfrak{g}_B, or simply by g\mathfrak{g}. By Prop. 2, if gμ≠0\mathfrak{g}^\mu\not= 0 then μ∈Q+\mu\in Q_+, or μ∈Q−\mu\in Q_-, or μ=0\mu= 0. Denote by XαX_{\alpha} (resp. Hα,X−αH_{\alpha}, X_{-\alpha}) the canonical image of xαx_{\alpha} (resp. hα,x−αh_{\alpha}, x_{-\alpha}) in g\mathfrak{g}. In view of the definition of a,n\mathfrak{a},\mathfrak{n} and θ(n)\theta (\mathfrak{n}), it follows that g\mathfrak{g} is the Lie algebra defined by the generating family ((Xα,Hα,X−α))α∈B((X_{\alpha}, H_{\alpha}, X_{-\alpha}))_{\alpha\in B} and the relations

[Hα,Hβ]=0(16) [H_{\alpha}, H_{\beta}] = 0 \tag{16}
[Hα,Xβ]−n(β,α)Xβ=0(17) [H_{\alpha}, X_{\beta}]-n(\beta , \alpha )X_{\beta}= 0 \tag{17}
[Hα,X−β]+n(β,α)X−β=0(18) [H_{\alpha}, X_{-\beta}] +n(\beta , \alpha )X_{-\beta}= 0 \tag{18}
[Xα,X−α]+Hα=0(19) [X_{\alpha}, X_{-\alpha}] +H_{\alpha}= 0 \tag{19}
[Xα,X−β]=0(α≠β)(20) [X_{\alpha}, X_{-\beta}] = 0(\alpha \not=\beta ) \tag{20}

(ad XαX_{\alpha})1−n(β,α)Xβ=0(α≠β)^{1-n(\beta ,\alpha)}X_{\beta}= 0(\alpha \not=\beta ) (21)

(ad X−αX_{-\alpha})1−n(β,α)X−β=0(α≠β)^{1-n(\beta ,\alpha)}X_{-\beta}= 0(\alpha \not=\beta ). (22)

Let z∈gz\in \mathfrak{g} and μ∈Q\mu\in Q. Then z∈gμz\in \mathfrak{g}^\mu if and only if [Hα,z]=⟨μ,α∨⟩z[H_{\alpha}, z] =\langle \mu, \alpha^{\vee}\rangle z for all α∈B\alpha \in B. This follows from Lemma 5.

Since a0∩(n+θ(n))=0\mathfrak{a}^0\cap (\mathfrak{n}+\theta (\mathfrak{n})) = 0, the canonical map from a0\mathfrak{a}^0 to g0\mathfrak{g}^0 is an isomorphism. Consequently, (Hα)α∈B(H_{\alpha})_{\alpha\in B} is a basis of the vector space g0\mathfrak{g}^0. The commutative subalgebra g0\mathfrak{g}^0 of gB\mathfrak{g}_B will be denoted by hB\mathfrak{h}_B or simply by h\mathfrak{h}. There exists a unique isomorphism μ→μB\mu \rightarrow \mu_B from V to h∗\mathfrak{h}^* such that ⟨μB,Hα⟩=⟨μ,α∨⟩\langle \mu_B, H_{\alpha}\rangle =\langle \mu, \alpha^{\vee}\rangle for all μ∈V\mu\in V and all α∈B\alpha \in B.

The involutive automorphism θ\theta of a\mathfrak{a} defines by passage to the quotient an involutive automorphism of g\mathfrak{g} that will also be denoted by θ\theta. We have θ(Xα)=X−α\theta (X_{\alpha}) =X_{-\alpha} for α∈B∪(−B)\alpha \in B\cup (-B), and θ(Hα)=−Hα\theta (H_{\alpha}) =-H_{\alpha}.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.