The ideal n of a+ generated by the xαβ(α,β∈B,α=β) is an ideal of a. The ideal of a− generated by the yαβ(α,β∈B,α=β) is an ideal of a and is equal to θ(n).
Let n′=∑α,β∈B,α=βkxαβ. Since each xαβ is homogeneous in a,[a0,n′]⊂n′
(Lemma 5 and Prop. 2). Let U (resp. V) be the enveloping algebra of a (resp. a+), and σ the representation of U on a defined by the adjoint representation of a. The ideal of a generated by n′ is σ(U)n′. Now a=a++a0+a− (Prop. 2),σ(a−)n′=0 (Lemma 6), and σ(a0)n′⊂n′ by the preceding. By the Poincaré-Birkhoff-Witt theorem, σ(U)n′=σ(V)n′, which proves the first assertion of the lemma. It follows that the ideal of θ(a+)=a− generated by the θ(xαβ)=yαβ(α,β∈B,α=β) is the ideal θ(n) of a. Q.E.D.
The ideal n+θ(n) of a is graded since it is generated by homogeneous elements. Consequently, the Lie algebra a/(n+θ(n)) is a Q-graded Lie algebra; in the remainder of this paragraph, it is denoted by gB, or simply by g. By Prop. 2, if gμ=0 then μ∈Q+, or μ∈Q−, or μ=0. Denote by Xα (resp. Hα,X−α) the canonical image of xα (resp. hα,x−α) in g. In view of the definition of a,n and θ(n), it follows that g is the Lie algebra defined by the generating family ((Xα,Hα,X−α))α∈B and the relations
[Hα,Hβ]=0(16)
[Hα,Xβ]−n(β,α)Xβ=0(17)
[Hα,X−β]+n(β,α)X−β=0(18)
[Xα,X−α]+Hα=0(19)
[Xα,X−β]=0(α=β)(20)
(ad Xα)1−n(β,α)Xβ=0(α=β) (21)
(ad X−α)1−n(β,α)X−β=0(α=β). (22)
Let z∈g and μ∈Q. Then z∈gμ if and only if [Hα,z]=⟨μ,α∨⟩z for all α∈B. This follows from Lemma 5.
Since a0∩(n+θ(n))=0, the canonical map from a0 to g0 is an isomorphism. Consequently, (Hα)α∈B is a basis of the vector space g0. The commutative subalgebra g0 of gB will be denoted by hB or simply by h. There exists a unique isomorphism μ→μB from V to h∗ such that ⟨μB,Hα⟩=⟨μ,α∨⟩ for all μ∈V and all α∈B.
The involutive automorphism θ of a defines by passage to the quotient an involutive automorphism of g that will also be denoted by θ. We have θ(Xα)=X−α for α∈B∪(−B), and θ(Hα)=−Hα.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.