Bourbaki

Lemma 1

Tag 012M, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 012M].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VIII, § 6. Modules over a split semi-simple Lie algebra

Let V be a g\mathfrak{g}-module and v∈Vv\in V. The following conditions are equivalent:

(i) b+v⊂kv\mathfrak{b}_+v\subset kv;

(ii) hv⊂kv\mathfrak{h}v\subset kv and n+v=0\mathfrak{n}_+v= 0;

(iii) hv⊂kv\mathfrak{h}v\subset kv and gαv=0\mathfrak{g}^{\alpha}v= 0 for all α∈B\alpha \in B.

(i) =⇒=\Rightarrow (ii): Assume that b+v⊂kv\mathfrak{b}_+v\subset kv. There exists λ∈h∗\lambda \in \mathfrak{h}^* such that v∈Vλv\in V^{\lambda}. Let α∈R+\alpha \in R_+. Then gα.v⊂Vλ∩Vλ+α=0\mathfrak{g}^{\alpha}.v\subset V^{\lambda}\cap V^{\lambda+\alpha}= 0. Hence n+v=0\mathfrak{n}_+v= 0.

(ii) =⇒=\Rightarrow (iii): This is clear.

(iii) =⇒=\Rightarrow (i): This follows from the fact that (Xα)α∈B(X_{\alpha})_{\alpha\in B} generates n+(\mathfrak{n}_+(§3, no. 3, Prop. 9 (iii)).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.