Bourbaki

Lemma 8

Tag 017H, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 017H].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VIII, § 11. Classes of nilpotent elements and sl2 -triplets

Assume that kk is algebraically closed and that g\mathfrak{g} is semi-simple. Let hh be a semi-simple element of g\mathfrak{g} such that the eigenvalues of ad hh are rational. Let g0=\mathfrak{g}^0= Ker(ad hh),g2=,\mathfrak{g}^2= Ker(ad h−2h-2). Let GhG_h be the set of elementary automorphisms of g\mathfrak{g} leaving hh fixed. Let x∈g2x\in \mathfrak{g}^2 be such that [x,g0]=g2[x,\mathfrak{g}^0] =\mathfrak{g}^2. Then GhxG_hx contains a subset of g2\mathfrak{g}^2 that is dense and open in the Zariski topology.

Let h\mathfrak{h} be a Cartan subalgebra of g0\mathfrak{g}^0. This is a Cartan subalgebra of g\mathfrak{g} containing hh (Chap. VII, §2, no. 3, Prop. 10). We have h∈hQh\in \mathfrak{h}_{\mathbf{Q}}. Let R be the root system of (g,h),Q(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h}), Q the group of radical weights. There exists a basis B of R such that α(h)≥0\alpha (h)\geq 0 for all α∈B\alpha \in B.

Let U be the set of z∈hz\in \mathfrak{h} such that α(z)≠0\alpha (z)\not= 0 for all α∈B\alpha \in B. Let (Hα′)α∈B(H'_{\alpha})_{\alpha\in B} be the basis of h\mathfrak{h} dual to B. If z∈Uz\in U, there exists a homomorphism from Q to k∗k^* that takes any γ∈Q\gamma \in Q to ∏α∈Bα(z)γ(Hα′)\prod_{\alpha\in B}\alpha (z)^{\gamma(H'_{\alpha})}. By §5, Prop. 2 and 4, the

endomorphism φ(z)\varphi (z) of the vector space g\mathfrak{g} which induces on gγ\mathfrak{g}^{\gamma} the homothety with ratio ∏α∈Bα(z)γ(Hα′)\prod_{\alpha\in B}\alpha (z)^{\gamma(H'_{\alpha})} is an elementary automorphism of g\mathfrak{g}, which clearly

belongs to GhG_h.

Let s∈hs\in \mathfrak{h}. If γ∈R\gamma \in R is such that gγ∩g2≠0\mathfrak{g}^{\gamma}\cap \mathfrak{g}^2\not= 0,

2=γ(h)=γ(∑α∈Bα(h)Hα′)=∑α∈Bα(h)γ(Hα′) 2 =\gamma (h) =\gamma (\sum_{\alpha\in B}\alpha (h)H'_{\alpha})=\sum_{\alpha\in B}\alpha (h)\gamma (H'_{\alpha})

since α(h)≥0\alpha (h)\geq 0 for all α∈B\alpha \in B, and since the γ(Hα′)\gamma (H'_{\alpha}) are integers either all ≥0\geq 0 or all ≤0\leq 0, we have γ(Hα′)∈N\gamma (H'_{\alpha})\in \mathbf{N} for all α∈B\alpha \in B. Thus, we can consider (for z∈hz\in \mathfrak{h}) the endomorphism ψ(z)\psi (z) of the vector space g2\mathfrak{g}^2 that induces on gγ∩g2\mathfrak{g}^{\gamma}\cap \mathfrak{g}^2 the homothety with ratio ∏α∈Bα(z)γ(Hα′)\prod_{\alpha\in B}\alpha (z)^{\gamma(H'_{\alpha})}. The map z→ψ(z)z \rightarrow \psi (z) from h\mathfrak{h} to End(g2\mathfrak{g}^2) is polynomial. For z∈Uz\in U, we have ψ(z)=φ(z)∣g2\psi (z) =\varphi (z)|\mathfrak{g}^2.

Let γ1,...,γr\gamma_1, . . . , \gamma_r be the distinct roots of (g,h)(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h}) vanishing on hh. If y1∈gγ1,...y_1\in \mathfrak{g}^{\gamma_1}, . . ., yr∈gγry_r\in \mathfrak{g}^{\gamma_r}, we have eady1...eadyr∈Ghe^{ady_1}. . . e^{ady_r}\in G_h. We can thus define a map ρ\rho from h×gγ1×⋯×gγr\mathfrak{h}\times \mathfrak{g}^{\gamma_1}\times \cdots \times \mathfrak{g}^{\gamma_r} to g2\mathfrak{g}^2 by putting

ρ(z,y1,...,yr)=ψ(z)eady1...eadyrx \rho (z, y_1, . . . , y_r) =\psi (z)e^{ady_1}. . . e^{ady_r}x

for z∈h,y1∈gγ1,...,yr∈gγrz\in \mathfrak{h}, y_1\in \mathfrak{g}^{\gamma_1}, . . . , y_r\in \mathfrak{g}^{\gamma_r}. This map is polynomial, and ρ(U,gγ1,...,gγr)\rho (U,\mathfrak{g}^{\gamma_1}, . . . ,\mathfrak{g}^{\gamma_r}) ⊂Ghx\subset G_hx. By Chap. VII, App. I, Prop. 3 and 4, it suffices to prove that the tangent linear map of ρ\rho is surjective at some point.

Now let T be the tangent linear map of z→ψ(z)z \rightarrow \psi (z) at h0=∑α∈BHα′h_0=\sum_{\alpha\in B}H'_{\alpha}. Then T(z)T(z) is the endomorphism of g2\mathfrak{g}^2 that induces on gγ∩g2\mathfrak{g}^{\gamma}\cap \mathfrak{g}^2 the homothety with ratio

∑α∈Bγ(Hα′)α(h0)γ(Hα′)−1α(z)∏β∈B,β≠αβ(h0)γ(Hα′)=∑α∈Bγ(Hα′)α(z)=γ(z) \sum_{\alpha\in B}\gamma (H'_{\alpha})\alpha (h_0)^{\gamma(H'_{\alpha})-1}\alpha (z)\prod_{\beta\in B,\beta\not=\alpha}\beta (h_0)^{\gamma(H'_{\alpha})}=\sum_{\alpha\in B}\gamma (H'_{\alpha})\alpha (z) =\gamma (z)

Thus, the tangent linear map of z→ρ(z,0,...,0)z \rightarrow \rho (z,0, . . . ,0) at h0h_0 is the map z→[z,x]z \rightarrow [z, x]; its image is [x,h][x,\mathfrak{h}]. The tangent linear map at 0 of the map y1→ρ(h0,y1,0,...,0)y_1 \rightarrow \rho (h_0, y_1,0, . . . ,0) is the map y1→ψ(h0)[y1,x]y_1 \rightarrow \psi (h_0)[y_1, x]; this last map has image ψ(h0)[x,gγ1]=[x,gγ1]\psi (h_0)[x,\mathfrak{g}^{\gamma_1}] = [x,\mathfrak{g}^{\gamma_1}]. Similarly, the tangent linear map at 0 of the map yi→ρ(h0,0,...,0,yi,0,...,0)y_i \rightarrow \rho (h_0,0, . . . ,0, y_i,0, . . . ,0) has image [x,gγi][x,\mathfrak{g}^{\gamma_i}]. Finally, the tangent linear map of ρ\rho at (h0,0,...,0)(h_0,0, . . . ,0) has image

[x,h+gγ1+⋯+gγr]=[x,g0]=g2.Q.E.D [x,\mathfrak{h}+\mathfrak{g}^{\gamma_1}+\cdots +\mathfrak{g}^{\gamma_r}] = [x,\mathfrak{g}^0] =\mathfrak{g}^2.Q.E.D

\*The group GhG_h is an algebraic group with Lie algebra ad g0\mathfrak{g}^0.\*

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.