Bourbaki

Corollary 4

Tag 018D, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 018D].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VIII, § 12. Chevalley orders

There exists a Chevalley system (Xα)α∈R(X_{\alpha})_{\alpha\in R} in (g,h)((\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h}) (§2, no. 4, Def. 3) such that Xα=xαX_{\alpha}=x_{\alpha} and X−α=yαX_{-\alpha}=y_{\alpha} for α∈B\alpha \in B. For every Chevalley system (Xα′)α∈R(X'_{\alpha})_{\alpha\in R} having these properties, and for all α∈R,Xα′\alpha \in R,X'_{\alpha} is a basis of G∩gα\mathscr{G}\cap \mathfrak{g}^{\alpha}.

For α∈B\alpha \in B, put Xα=xα,X−α=yαX_{\alpha}=x_{\alpha}, X_{-\alpha}=y_{\alpha}. For α∈R+\alpha \in R_+ -- B, choose a w∈Ww\in W such that w(α)∈Bw(\alpha )\in B and an automorphism φ\varphi of g\mathfrak{g} such that θφ=φθ,φ(G)=G\theta \varphi =\varphi \theta ,\varphi (\mathscr{G}) =\mathscr{G} and φ(h)=w−1(h)\varphi (h) =w^{-1}(h) for h∈hh\in \mathfrak{h} (Cor. 2); put Xα=φ(xw(α)),X−α=φ(yw(α))X_{\alpha}=\varphi (x_{w(\alpha)}), X_{-\alpha}=\varphi (y_{w(\alpha)}). Then

[X−α,Xα]=φ([yw(α),xw(α)])=φ(Hw(α))=w−1(Hw(α))=Hα [X_{-\alpha}, X_{\alpha}] =\varphi ([y_{w(\alpha)}, x_{w(\alpha)}]) =\varphi (H_{w(\alpha)}) =w^{-1}(H_{w(\alpha)}) =H_{\alpha}
θ(Xα)=θφ(xw(α))=φθ(xw(α))=φ(yw(α))=X−α \theta (X_{\alpha}) =\theta \varphi (x_{w(\alpha)}) =\varphi \theta (x_{w(\alpha)}) =\varphi (y_{w(\alpha)}) =X_{-\alpha}

so (Xα)α∈R(X_{\alpha})_{\alpha\in R} is a Chevalley system. Moreover,

G∩gα=φ(G∩gw(α))=φ(Zxw(α))=ZXα(32) \mathscr{G}\cap \mathfrak{g}^{\alpha}=\varphi (\mathscr{G}\cap \mathfrak{g}^{w(\alpha)}) =\varphi (\mathbf{Z}x_{w(\alpha)}) =\mathbf{Z}X_{\alpha} \tag{32}
G∩g−α=φ(G∩g−w(α))=φ(Zyw(α))=ZX−α(33) \mathscr{G}\cap \mathfrak{g}^{-\alpha}=\varphi (\mathscr{G}\cap \mathfrak{g}^{-w(\alpha)}) =\varphi (\mathbf{Z}y_{w(\alpha)}) =\mathbf{Z}X_{-\alpha} \tag{33}

Let (Xα′)α∈R(X'_{\alpha})_{\alpha\in R} be a Chevalley system such that Xα′=xα,X−α′=yαX'_{\alpha}=x_{\alpha}, X'_{-\alpha}=y_{\alpha} for α∈B\alpha \in B. Let S be the set of α∈R\alpha \in R such that Xα′=±XαX'_{\alpha}=\pm X_{\alpha}. By §2, no. 4, Prop. 7, S is a closed set of roots. Since S⊃B∪(−B)S\supset B\cup (-B), we have S = R (Chap. VI, §1, no. 6, Prop. 19). Thus, by (32) and (33), we have G∩gα=ZXα′\mathscr{G}\cap \mathfrak{g}^{\alpha}=\mathbf{Z}X'_{\alpha} for all α∈R\alpha \in R.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.