Proposition 1
Tag 019D, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 019D].
Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter IX, § 1. Compact Lie algebras
Let be a (real) Lie algebra. The following conditions are equivalent:
(i) is isomorphic to the Lie algebra of a compact Lie group.
(ii) The group Int() (Chap. III, §6, no. 2, Def. 2) is compact.
(iii) has an invariant bilinear form (Chap. I, §3, no. 6) that is symmetric, positive and separating.
(iv) is reductive (Chap. I, §6, no. 4, Def. 4); for all , the endomorphism ad is semi-simple, with purely imaginary eigenvalues.
(v) is reductive and its Killing form B is negative.
(i) (ii): if is the Lie algebra of a compact Lie group G, the group Int() is separating and isomorphic to a quotient of the compact group (Chap. III, §6, no. 4, Cor. 4), hence is compact.
(ii) (iii): if the group Int() is compact, there exists a symmetric bilinear form on that is positive, separating and invariant under Int() (no. 1), hence also invariant under the adjoint representation of .
(iii) (iv): if (iii) is satisfied, the adjoint representation of is semi-simple (no. 1), hence is reductive; moreover, the endomorphisms ad , for , have the indicated properties (no. 1).
(iv) (v): for all Tr((ad )); consequently, is the sum of the squares of the eigenvalues of ad , and hence is negative if these are purely imaginary.
(v) (i): assume that is reductive, hence the product of a commutative subalgebra and a semi-simple subalgebra (Chap. I, §6, no. 4, Prop. 5). The Killing form of is the restriction of the form B to , hence is negative and separating if B is negative. The subgroup Int() of is closed (it is the identity component of Aut(), Chap. III, §10, no. 2, Cor. 2) and leaves the separating positive form invariant; thus, it is compact, and is isomorphic to the Lie algebra of the compact Lie group Int(). Further, since is commutative, it is isomorphic to the Lie algebra of a torus T. Thus is isomorphic to the Lie algebra of the compact Lie group Int().
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
- Definition 1, § 1
- Proposition 2, § 1
- Proposition 3, § 1
- Theorem 1, § 2
- Theorem 1, § 3
- § 4. Root system associated to a compact group
Cites
- Chap. I, §3, no. 6
- Chap. I, §6, no. 4, Def. 4 not in this corpus
- Chap. I, §6, no. 4, Prop. 5 not in this corpus
- Chap. III, §10, no. 2, Cor. 2 not in this corpus
- Chap. III, §6, no. 2, Def. 2 not in this corpus
- Chap. III, §6, no. 4, Cor. 4 not in this corpus