Bourbaki

§ 1. Compact Lie algebras

1. Invariant hermitian forms

In this number, the letter kk denotes the field R\mathbf{R} or C\mathbf{C}. Let V be a finite dimensional kk-vector space, Φ\Phi a separating2^2 positive hermitian form on V, G a group, g\mathfrak{g} an R\mathbf{R}-Lie algebra, ρ:G→GL(V)\rho : G\rightarrow \mathbf{G}\mathbf{L}(V) a group homomorphism, φ:g→gl(V)\varphi :\mathfrak{g}\rightarrow \mathfrak{g}\mathfrak{l}(V) a homomorphism of R\mathbf{R}-Lie algebras.

a) The form Φ\Phi is invariant under G (resp. g\mathfrak{g}) if and only if ρ(g)\rho (g) is unitary with respect to Φ\Phi for all g∈Gg\in G (resp. φ(x)\varphi (x) is anti-hermitian3^3 with respect to Φ\Phi for all x∈gx\in \mathfrak{g}). Indeed, denote by a∗a^* the adjoint of an endomorphism aa of V with respect to Φ\Phi; for gg in G,xG,x in g,u\mathfrak{g},u and vv in V, we have

Φ(ρ(g)u,ρ(g)v)=Φ(ρ(g)∗ρ(g)u,v) \Phi (\rho (g)u, \rho (g)v) =\Phi (\rho (g)^*\rho (g)u, v)
Φ(φ(x)u,v)+Φ(u,φ(x)v)=Φ((φ(x)+φ(x)∗).u,v) \Phi (\varphi (x)u, v) +\Phi (u, \varphi (x)v) =\Phi ((\varphi (x) +\varphi (x)^*).u, v)

1^1 Throughout this chapter, references to Algebra, Chap. VIII, are to the new edition

(in preparation)

2^2 Recall (Algebra, Chap. IX, in preparation) that a hermitian form H on V is said

to be separating (or non-degenerate) if, for every non-zero element uu of V, there

exists v∈Vv\in V such that H(u,v)≠0H(u, v)\not= 0.

3^3 An element a∈a\in End(V) is said to be anti-hermitian with respect to Φ\Phi if the

adjoint a∗a^* of aa with respect to Φ\Phi is equal to −a-a. When k=Ck=\mathbf{C} (resp. k=Rk=\mathbf{R}) this

also means that the endomorphism iaia of V (resp. of C⊗RV\mathbf{C}\otimes_{\mathbf{R}}V) is hermitian. thus, Φ(ρ(g)u,ρ(g)v)=Φ(u,v)\Phi (\rho (g)u, \rho (g)v) =\Phi (u, v) for all u,vu, v in V if and only if ρ(g)∗ρ(g)=\rho (g)^*\rho (g) = IdV_V; similarly, Φ(φ(x)u,v)+Φ(u,φ(x)v)=0\Phi (\varphi (x)u, v) +\Phi (u, \varphi (x)v) = 0 for all u,vu, v in V if and only if φ(x)+φ(x)∗=0\varphi (x) +\varphi (x)^*= 0, hence the stated assertion.

b) If the form Φ\Phi is invariant under G (resp. g\mathfrak{g}), the orthogonal complement of a stable subspace of V is stable; in particular, the representation ρ\rho (resp. φ\varphi ) is then semi-simple (cf. Algebra, Chap. IX); moreover, for all g∈Gg\in G (resp. x∈gx\in \mathfrak{g}), the endomorphism ρ(g)\rho (g) (resp. φ(x)\varphi (x)) of V is then semi-simple, with eigenvalues of absolute value 1 (resp. with purely imaginary eigenvalues); indeed ρ(g)\rho (g) is unitary (resp. iφ(x)i\varphi (x) is hermitian, cf. Algebra, Chap. IX).

c) Assume that k=Rk=\mathbf{R}. If G is a connected Lie group, ρ\rho a morphism of Lie groups, g\mathfrak{g} the Lie algebra of G and φ\varphi the homomorphism induced by ρ\rho, then Φ\Phi is invariant under G if and only if it is invariant under g\mathfrak{g} (Chap. III, §6, no. 5, Cor. 3).

d) There exists a separating positive hermitian form on V invariant under G if and only if the subgroup ρ(G)\rho (G) of GL(V)\mathbf{G}\mathbf{L}(V) is relatively compact (Integration, Chap. VII, §3, no. 1, Prop. 1).

2. Connected commutative real Lie groups

Let G be a connected commutative (real) Lie group. The exponential map

expG:L(G)→G_G: L(G)\rightarrow G

is a morphism of Lie groups, surjective with discrete kernel (Chap. III, §6, no. 4, Prop. 11), hence the fact that L(G) is a connected covering of G.

a) The following conditions are equivalent: G is simply-connected, expG_G is an isomorphism, G is isomorphic to Rn(n=\mathbf{R}^n(n= dim G). In this case, transporting the vector space structure of L(G) to G by the isomorphism expG_G gives a vector space structure on G, which is the only one compatible with the topological group structure of G. Simply-connected commutative Lie groups are called vector (Lie) groups; unless stated otherwise, they are always given the R\mathbf{R}-vector space structure defined above.

b) Denote by Γ(G)\Gamma (G) the kernel of expG_G. By General Topology, Chap. VII, §1, no. 1, Th. 1, the group G is compact if and only if Γ(G)\Gamma (G) is a lattice in L(G), in other words (loc. cit.) if the rank of the free Z\mathbf{Z}-module Γ(G)\Gamma (G) is equal to the dimension of G. Conversely, if L is a finite dimensional R\mathbf{R}-vector space and Γ\Gamma a lattice in L, the quotient topological group L/ΓL/\Gamma is a compact connected commutative Lie group.

The compact connected commutative Lie groups are called real tori, or (in this chapter) tori.

c) In the general case, let E be the vector subspace of L(G) generated by Γ\Gamma (G), and let V be a complementary subspace. Then G is the direct product of its Lie subgroups exp(E) and exp(V); the first is a torus, the second is vector. Finally, every compact subgroup of G is contained in exp(E) (since its projection onto exp(V) is necessarily reduced to the identity element); thus, the subgroup exp(E) is the unique maximal compact subgroup of G.

For example, take G=C∗G = C^*; identify L(G) with C\mathbf{C} so that the exponential map of G is x→exx \rightarrow e^x. Then Γ(G)=2πiZ,E=iR\Gamma (G) = 2\pi i\mathbf{Z},E =i\mathbf{R}, and so exp(E) =U=\mathbf{U}; if we take V=RV =\mathbf{R}, then exp(V) =R+∗=\mathbf{R}^*_+ and we recover the isomorphism C∗→U×R+∗\mathbf{C}^*\rightarrow \mathbf{U}\times \mathbf{R}^*_+ constructed in General Topology, Chap. VIII, §1, no. 3, Prop. 1.

d) Note finally that expG:L(G)→G_G: L(G)\rightarrow G is a universal covering of G, hence Γ(G)\Gamma (G) can be identified naturally with the fundamental group of G.

3. Compact Lie algebras

Proposition 1 019D

Let g\mathfrak{g} be a (real) Lie algebra. The following conditions are equivalent:

(i) g\mathfrak{g} is isomorphic to the Lie algebra of a compact Lie group.

(ii) The group Int(g\mathfrak{g}) (Chap. III, §6, no. 2, Def. 2) is compact.

(iii) g\mathfrak{g} has an invariant bilinear form (Chap. I, §3, no. 6) that is symmetric, positive and separating.

(iv) g\mathfrak{g} is reductive (Chap. I, §6, no. 4, Def. 4); for all x∈gx\in \mathfrak{g}, the endomorphism ad xx is semi-simple, with purely imaginary eigenvalues.

(v) g\mathfrak{g} is reductive and its Killing form B is negative.

(i) =⇒=\Rightarrow (ii): if g\mathfrak{g} is the Lie algebra of a compact Lie group G, the group Int(g\mathfrak{g}) is separating and isomorphic to a quotient of the compact group G0G_0 (Chap. III, §6, no. 4, Cor. 4), hence is compact.

(ii) =⇒=\Rightarrow (iii): if the group Int(g\mathfrak{g}) is compact, there exists a symmetric bilinear form on g\mathfrak{g} that is positive, separating and invariant under Int(g\mathfrak{g}) (no. 1), hence also invariant under the adjoint representation of g\mathfrak{g}.

(iii) =⇒=\Rightarrow (iv): if (iii) is satisfied, the adjoint representation of g\mathfrak{g} is semi-simple (no. 1), hence g\mathfrak{g} is reductive; moreover, the endomorphisms ad xx, for x∈gx\in \mathfrak{g}, have the indicated properties (no. 1).

(iv) =⇒=\Rightarrow (v): for all x∈g,B(x,x)=x\in \mathfrak{g}, B(x, x) = Tr((ad xx)2^2); consequently, B(x,x)B(x, x) is the sum of the squares of the eigenvalues of ad xx, and hence is negative if these are purely imaginary.

(v) =⇒=\Rightarrow (i): assume that g\mathfrak{g} is reductive, hence the product of a commutative subalgebra c\mathfrak{c} and a semi-simple subalgebra s\mathfrak{s} (Chap. I, §6, no. 4, Prop. 5). The Killing form of s\mathfrak{s} is the restriction of the form B to s\mathfrak{s}, hence is negative and separating if B is negative. The subgroup Int(s\mathfrak{s}) of GL(s)\mathbf{G}\mathbf{L}(\mathfrak{s}) is closed (it is the identity component of Aut(s\mathfrak{s}), Chap. III, §10, no. 2, Cor. 2) and leaves the separating positive form −B-B invariant; thus, it is compact, and s\mathfrak{s} is isomorphic to the Lie algebra of the compact Lie group Int(s\mathfrak{s}). Further, since c\mathfrak{c} is commutative, it is isomorphic to the Lie algebra of a torus T. Thus g\mathfrak{g} is isomorphic to the Lie algebra of the compact Lie group Int(s\mathfrak{s})×T\times T.

Definition 1 019E

A compact Lie algebra4^4 is a Lie algebra that has properties (i) to (v) of Proposition 1.

Thus, the compact Lie algebras are the products of a commutative algebra with a compact semi-simple algebra. In other words, a Lie algebra is compact if and only if it is reductive and its derived Lie algebra is compact.

The Lie algebra of a compact Lie group is compact.

Proposition 2 019F

a) The product of a finite number of Lie algebras is a compact Lie algebra if and only if each factor is compact.

b) A subalgebra of a compact Lie algebra is compact.

c) Let h\mathfrak{h} be an ideal of a compact Lie algebra g\mathfrak{g}. Then the algebra g/h\mathfrak{g}/\mathfrak{h} is compact and the extension h→g→g/h\mathfrak{h}\rightarrow \mathfrak{g}\rightarrow \mathfrak{g}/\mathfrak{h} is trivial.

Assertions a) and b) follow from the characterization (iii) of Prop. 1. Part c) follows from a) and the fact that, in a reductive Lie algebra, every ideal is a direct factor (Chap. I, §6, no. 4, Cor. of Prop. 5).

Proposition 3 019G

Let G be a Lie group of which the group of connected components is finite. The following conditions are equivalent:

(i) The Lie algebra L(G) is compact.

(ii) The group Ad(G) is compact.

(iii) There exists a separating positive symmetric bilinear form on L(G) invariant under the adjoint representation of G.

\*(iv) G has a riemannian metric invariant under left and right translations.\*

(i) =⇒=\Rightarrow (ii): if L(G) is compact, the group Ad(G0_0) == Int(L(G)) is compact; since it has finite index in Ad(G), this latter group is also compact.

(ii) =⇒=\Rightarrow (iii): this follows from no. 1.

(iii) =⇒=\Rightarrow (i): since Int(L(G)) ⊂\subset Ad(G), this follows from the characterization (iii) of Prop. 1.

\*(iii) ⇐⇒\Leftarrow \Rightarrow (iv): this follows from Chap. III, §3, no. 13.\*

4. Groups whose Lie algebra is compact

Theorem 1 019H

(H. Weyl) Let G be a connected Lie group whose Lie algebra is compact semi-simple. Then G is compact and its centre is finite.

Since G is semi-simple, its centre D is discrete. Moreover, the quotient group G/DG/D is isomorphic to Ad(G) (Chap. III, §6, no. 4, Cor. 4), hence compact (Prop. 3). Finally, the group G/DG/D is equal to its derived group (Chap. III, §9, no. 2, Cor. of Prop. 4). The theorem now follows from Integration, Chap. VII, §3, no. 2, Prop. 5.

Proposition 4 019I

Let G be a connected Lie group whose Lie algebra is compact. There exist a torus T, a simply-connected compact semi-simple Lie

4^4 Note that a real topological vector space cannot be a compact topological space

unless it is reduced to 0. group S, a vector group V and a surjective morphism f:V×T×S→Gf: V\times T\times S\rightarrow G with finite kernel. If G is compact, the group V is reduced to the identity element.

Let C (resp. S) be a simply-connected Lie group whose Lie algebra is isomorphic to the centre (resp. the derived algebra) of L(G). Then C is a vector group, S is a compact group with finite centre (Th. 1) and G can be identified with the quotient of C×SC\times S by a discrete subgroup D, which is central (Integration, Chap. VII, §3, no. 2, Lemma 4). Since the image of the projection of D onto S is central, hence finite, D∩CD\cap C is of finite index in D. Let C′C' be the vector subspace of C generated by D∩CD\cap C, and V a complementary subspace. Then the group T=C′/(D∩C)T = C'/(D\cap C) is a torus, and G is isomorphic to the quotient of the product group V×T×SV\times T\times S by a finite group.

If G is compact, so is V×T×S(V\times T\times S (General Topology, Chap. III, §4, no. 1, Cor. 2 of Prop. 2), hence so is V, which implies that V={e}V =\{e\}.

Corollary 1 019J

Let G be a connected compact Lie group. Then C(G)0C(G)_0 is a torus, D(G) is a connected compact semi-simple Lie group and the morphism (x,y)→xy(x, y) \rightarrow xy from C(G)0×D(G)C(G)_0\times D(G) to G is a finite covering.

With the notation in Prop. 4, we have V={e}V =\{e\} and the subgroups f(T)f(T) and f(S)f(S) of G are compact, hence closed. Thus it suffices to show that f(T)=f(T) = C(G)0,f(S)=D(G)C(G)_0,f(S) = D(G). Now, L(G)=L(f(T))×L(f(S))L(G) = L(f(T))\times L(f(S)); since S is semi-simple and T is commutative, this implies that L(f(T))=C(L(G))=L(C(G)0)L(f(T)) =\mathscr{C}(L(G)) = L(C(G)_0) (Chap. III, §9, no. 3, Prop. 8) and L(f(S))=DL(G)=L(D(G))L(f(S)) =\mathscr{D}L(G) = L(D(G)) (Chap. III, §9, no. 2, Cor. of Prop. 4), hence the stated assertion.

Corollary 2 019K

The centre and the fundamental group of a connected compact semi-simple Lie group are finite. Its universal covering is compact.

With the notation in Prop. 4, the groups V and T are reduced to the identity element; thus S is a universal covering of G, and the fundamental group of G is isomorphic to Ker ff, hence finite. The centre D of G is discrete since G is semi-simple, so D is finite.

Corollary 3 019L

The fundamental group of a connected compact Lie group G is a Z\mathbf{Z}-module of finite type, of rank equal to the dimension of C(G).

Indeed, with the notations in Cor. 1, the fundamental group of C(G)0C(G)_0 is isomorphic to Zn\mathbf{Z}^n, with n=n= dim C(G)0C(G)_0, and the fundamental group of D(G) is finite (Cor. 2).

Corollary 4 019M

Let G be a connected compact Lie group. The following conditions are equivalent:

(i) G is semi-simple;

(ii) C(G) is finite;

(i) π1(G)\pi_1(G) is finite.

If G is simply-connected, it is semi-simple.

This follows from Cor. 1 to 3.

Corollary 5 019N

Let G be a connected compact Lie group. Then Int(G) is the identity component of the Lie group Aut(G) (Chap. III, §10, no. 2).

Let f∈f\in Aut(G)0_0. Then ff induces an automorphism f1f_1 of C(G)0C(G)_0 and an automorphism f2f_2 of D(G), and we have f1∈f_1\in Aut(C(G)0_0)0,f2∈_0, f_2\in Aut(D(G))0_0. Since Aut(C(G)0_0) is discrete (General Topology, Chap. VII, §2, no. 4, Prop. 5), we have f1=f_1= Id; since D(G) is semi-simple, by Chap. III, §10, no. 2, Cor. 2 of Th. 1 there exists an element gg of D(G) such that f2(x)=gxg−1f_2(x) =gxg^{-1} for all x∈x\in D(G). For all x∈C(G)0x\in C(G)_0, we have gxg−1=xgxg^{-1}=x = f1(x)f_1(x); since G=C(G)0.D(G)G = C(G)_0.D(G), it follows that gxg−1=f(x)gxg^{-1}=f(x) for all x∈Gx\in G, so f=f= Int gg.

Proposition 5 019O

Let G be a Lie group whose Lie algebra is compact.

a) Assume that G is connected. Then G has a largest compact subgroup K; it is connected. There exists a closed central vector subgroup (no. 2) N of G such that G is the direct product N×KN\times K.

b) Assume that the group of connected components of G is finite. Then:

(i) Every compact subgroup of G is contained in a maximal compact subgroup.

(ii) If K1K_1 and K2K_2 are two maximal compact subgroups of G, there exists g∈Gg\in G such that K2=gK1g−1K_2=gK_1g^{-1}.

(iii) Let K be a maximal compact subgroup of G. Then K∩G0K\cap G_0 is equal to K0K_0; it is the largest compact subgroup of G0G_0.

(iv) There exists a closed central vector subgroup N of G0G_0, normal in G, such that, for any maximal compact subgroup K of G, G0G_0 is the direct product of K0K_0 by N, and G is the semi-direct product of K by N.

a) We retain the notations of Prop. 4. The projection of Ker ff onto V is a finite subgroup of the vector group V, hence is reduced to the identity element. It follows that Ker ff is contained in T×ST\times S, hence that G is the direct product of the vector group N=f(V)N =f(V) and the compact group K=f(T×S)K =f(T\times S). Every compact subgroup of G has a projection onto N that is reduced to the identity element, hence is contained in K. This proves a).

b) Assume now that G/G0G/G_0 is finite. By a),G0a), G_0 is the direct product of its largest compact subgroup M and a vector subgroup P; the subgroup M of G is clearly normal. Let n\mathfrak{n} be a vector subspace complement of L(M) in L(G), stable under the adjoint representation of G (no. 1 and no. 3, Prop. 3); this is an ideal of L(G) and we have L(G)=L(M)×nL(G) = L(M)\times \mathfrak{n}. Let N be the integral subgroup of G with Lie algebra n\mathfrak{n}; by Chap. III, §6, no. 6, Prop. 14, it is normal in G. The projection of L(G) onto L(P) with kernel L(M) induces an isomorphism from n\mathfrak{n} to L(P); it follows that the projection of G0G_0 onto P induces an étale morphism from N to P; since P is simply-connected, this is an isomorphism, and N is a vector group. The morphism (x,y)→xy(x, y) \rightarrow xy from M×NM\times N to G0G_0 is an injective étale morphism (since M∩NM\cap N is reduced to the identity element), hence an isomorphism. It follows that N is a closed subgroup of G and that the quotient G/NG/N is compact, since G0/NG_0/N is compact and G/G0G/G_0 is finite (General Topology, Chap. III, §4, no. 1, Cor. 2 of Prop. 2).

By Integration, Chap. VII, §3, no. 2, Prop. 3, every compact subgroup of G is contained in a maximal compact subgroup, these are conjugate, and for any maximal compact subgroup K of G, G is the semi-direct product of K by N. Since G0G_0 contains N, it is the semi-direct product of N by G0∩KG_0\cap K; it follows that G0∩KG_0\cap K is connected, hence equal to K0K_0, since K/(G0∩K)K/(G_0\cap K) is isomorphic to G/G0G/G_0, hence finite; finally, K0K_0 is clearly the largest compact subgroup of G0G_0 by a).

Corollary 019P

If N satisfies the conditions of b) (iv), and if K1K_1 and K2K_2 are two maximal compact subgroups of G, there exists n∈n\in N such that nK1n−1=K2nK_1n^{-1}= K_2.

Indeed, by (ii) there exists an element g∈Gg\in G such that gK1g−1=K2gK_1g^{-1}= K_2; by (iv), there exists n∈Nn\in N and k∈K1k\in K_1 such that g=nkg=nk. The element nn then has the required properties.

Exercises

See the exercises for § 1.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.