Bourbaki

Proposition 2

Tag 01JG, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01JG].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter IX, § 3. Compact forms of complex semi-simple Lie algebras

a)a) The real vector subspace a0=h0+∑α∈RRXα\mathfrak{a}_0=\mathfrak{h}_0+\sum_{\alpha\in R}\mathbf{R}X_{\alpha} of a\mathfrak{a} is a

real form of a\mathfrak{a}, of which h0\mathfrak{h}_0 is a Cartan subalgebra. The pair (a0,h0)(\mathfrak{a}_0,\mathfrak{h}_0) is a split semi-simple real Lie algebra, of which (Xα)(X_{\alpha}) is a Chevalley system.

b) Let σ\sigma be the conjugation of a\mathfrak{a} relative to a0\mathfrak{a}_0. Then σ∘θ=θ∘σ\sigma \circ \theta =\theta \circ \sigma. The set of fixed points of σ∘θ\sigma \circ \theta is a compact real form au\mathfrak{a}_u of a\mathfrak{a}, of which ih0i\mathfrak{h}_0 is a Cartan subalgebra.

Part a) follows immediately from the preceding. We prove b). Since σ∘θ\sigma \circ \theta and θ∘σ\theta \circ \sigma are two semi-linear maps from a\mathfrak{a} to a\mathfrak{a} that coincide on a0\mathfrak{a}_0, they coincide. Now σ∘θ\sigma \circ \theta satisfies conditions (2) of no. 1, hence is the conjugation of a\mathfrak{a} relative to the real form au\mathfrak{a}_u consisting of the x∈ax\in \mathfrak{a} such that σ∘θ(x)=x\sigma \circ \theta (x) =x (Prop. 1). For all α∈R\alpha \in R put

uα=Xα+X−α,vα=i(Xα−X−α)(6) u_{\alpha}=X_{\alpha}+X_{-\alpha},v_{\alpha}=i(X_{\alpha}-X_{-\alpha}) \tag{6}

Then the R\mathbf{R}-vector space au\mathfrak{a}_u is generated by ih0i\mathfrak{h}_0, the uαu_{\alpha} and the vαv_{\alpha}. More precisely, if we choose a chamber C of R, then

au=ih0⊕⨁α∈R+(C)(Ruα+Rvα)(7) \mathfrak{a}_u=i\mathfrak{h}_0\oplus \bigoplus_{\alpha\in R_+(C)}(\mathbf{R}u_{\alpha}+\mathbf{R}v_{\alpha}) \tag{7}

It is clear that ih0i\mathfrak{h}_0 is a Cartan subalgebra of au\mathfrak{a}_u, and it remains to prove that the restriction of B to au\mathfrak{a}_u is negative. Now ih0i\mathfrak{h}_0 and the different subspaces of the form Ruα⊕Rvα\mathbf{R}u_{\alpha}\oplus \mathbf{R}v_{\alpha} are orthogonal with respect to B, by (5); the restriction of B to ih0i\mathfrak{h}_0 is negative and

B(uα,uα)=B(vα,vα)=2B(Xα,X−α)<0,B(uα,vα)=0(8) B(u_{\alpha}, u_{\alpha}) = B(v_{\alpha}, v_{\alpha}) = 2B(X_{\alpha}, X_{-\alpha})<0,B(u_{\alpha}, v_{\alpha}) = 0 \tag{8}

hence the conclusion.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.