Bourbaki

Lemma

Tag 01SJ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01SJ].

Topologie algébrique, chapter I, § 6. Espaces simplement connexes

Let X, Y, Z be topological spaces and let g:Y→Zg: Y\rightarrow Z be a continuous mapping.

a) The mapping f↦g∘ff\mapsto g\circ f of Cc(X;Y)\mathscr{C}_c(X; Y) into Cc(X;Z)\mathscr{C}_c(X; Z) is continuous.

b) If the topological space Z is separated, the mapping h↦h∘gh\mapsto h\circ g of Cc(Z;X)\mathscr{C}_c(Z; X) into Cc(Y;X)\mathscr{C}_c(Y; X) is continuous.

Given a compact subset K of X, an open subset U of Z and a continuous mapping ff of X into Y, in order that one have (g∘f)(K)⊂U(g\circ f)(K)\subset U, it is necessary and sufficient that one have f(K)⊂g−1(U)f(K)\subset \overset{-1}{g}(U). The first assertion therefore follows from the definition of the topology of compact convergence (TG, X, p. 26, def. 1).

Analogously, let K be a compact subset of Y and U an open subset of X. Since Z is supposed separated, the set g(K)g(K) is compact (TG, I, p. 63, cor. 1). If hh is a mapping of Z into X, the condition (h∘g)(K)⊂U(h\circ g)(K)\subset U is nothing other than the condition h(g(K))⊂Uh(g(K))\subset U, whence the second assertion.

Let us now prove proposition 9. By the lemma, the mapping p~\widetilde{p} is continuous; by remark 1 of TG, X, p. 27, the mappings eEe_E and eBe_B are continuous. For every mapping g∈Cc(T;E)g\in \mathscr{C}_c(T; E), one has

(p∘eE)(g)=p(g(t))=(p∘g)(t)=p~(g)(t)=(eB∘p~)(g) (p\circ e_E)(g) =p(g(t)) = (p\circ g)(t) =\widetilde{p}(g)(t) = (e_B\circ \widetilde{p})(g)

so that the square diagram of the proposition is commutative.

Let φ:Cc(T;E)→Cc(T;B)×BE\varphi :\mathscr{C}_c(T; E)\rightarrow \mathscr{C}_c(T; B)\times_BE be the continuous mapping defined by φ(g)=(p∘g,g(t))\varphi (g) = (p\circ g, g(t)) for every g∈Cc(T;E)g\in \mathscr{C}_c(T; E). By proposition 3 of I, p. 125, it is bijective. In fact, for every pair (f,x)∈Cc(T;B)×BE,φ−1(f,x)(f, x)\in \mathscr{C}_c(T; B)\times_BE,\varphi^{-1}(f, x) is the unique continuous lifting gg of ff to E such that g(t)=xg(t) =x. Since the space T is locally compact, the mapping ψ:(Cc(T;B)×BE)×T→B\psi : (\mathscr{C}_c(T; B)\times_BE)\times T\rightarrow B defined by ψ((f,x),u)=f(u)\psi ((f, x), u) =f(u) is continuous (TG, X, p. 28, cor. 1). By corollary 3 above, the mapping ψ\psi has a unique continuous lifting θ:(Cc(T;B)×B\theta : (\mathscr{C}_c(T; B)\times_B E)×T→EE)\times T\rightarrow E such that θ((f,x),t)=x\theta ((f, x), t) =x for (f,x)∈Cc(T;B)×BE(f, x)\in \mathscr{C}_c(T; B)\times_BE. Thus θ((f,x),u)=φ−1(f,x)(u)\theta ((f, x), u) =\varphi^{-1}(f, x)(u) for (f,x)∈Cc(T;B)×BE(f, x)\in \mathscr{C}_c(T; B)\times_BE and u∈Tu\in T. By theorem 3 of TG, X, p. 28, the mapping (f,x)↦θ((f,x),⋅)(f, x)\mapsto \theta ((f, x),\cdot ) of Cc(T;B)×BE\mathscr{C}_c(T; B)\times_BE into Cc(T;E)\mathscr{C}_c(T; E) is continuous, that is to say φ−1\varphi^{-1} is continuous.

Thus, the mapping φ\varphi is a homeomorphism of Cc(T;E)\mathscr{C}_c(T; E) onto the fibred product Cc(T;B)×BE\mathscr{C}_c(T; B)\times_BE, whence the proposition (I, p. 8, prop. 2).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person.