Bourbaki

Lemma 2

Tag 01SK, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01SK].

Topologie algébrique, chapter I, § 6. Espaces simplement connexes

For every point x∈Xx\in X, the mapping μx:Ex×M→X\mu_x: E_x\times M\rightarrow X given by (g,u)↦g⋅u(g, u)\mapsto g\cdot u is universally strict, and its image Ex⋅ME_x\cdot M is a neighbourhood of xx in X. In particular, S⋅MS\cdot M is a neighbourhood of M.

Under assumption (i), the mapping μx\mu_x is open, since Ex×ME_x\times M is open in G×MG\times M. Its image is therefore open in X.

Now suppose that assumption (ii) is satisfied. The mapping μx\mu_x is proper (TG, I, p. 6, prop. 4, and p. 75, th. 1), hence universally strict (I, p. 20, corollary 11). Moreover, (G−Ex)⋅M(G-E_x)\cdot M is a closed subset of X which does not contain xx, so that Ex⋅ME_x\cdot M is a neighbourhood of xx.

The last assertion results from the fact that Ex⊂SE_x\subset S if x∈Mx\in M.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person.