Endowed with the action of N, the X-space (Y,p) is a principal left covering. It is trivializable over M.
Let x∈X; fix an element g∈Ex and an element g∈F such that φ(g)=g. We denote by μx:Ex×M→X the mapping given by (h,u)↦h⋅u.
Let n∈N, let h,k∈Ex and let u,v∈M be such that h⋅u=k⋅v; put s=g−1h,t=h−1k and r=st=g−1k. Since x belongs to g⋅M∩h⋅M∩k⋅M, the pair (s,t) belongs to T, whence xsxt=xr. Hence
π(ngxr,v)=π(ngxsxt,v)=π(ngxs,t⋅v)=π(ngxs,u)
There thus exists a unique mapping θ:N×(Ex⋅M)→Y such that θ(n,h⋅u)=π(ngxg−1h,u) for every n∈N, every h∈Ex and every u∈M. We have
p(θ(n,h⋅u))=p(π(ngxs,u))=q(ngxs,u)=φ(ngxs)⋅u=gs⋅u=h⋅u
Moreover, for n,n′∈N and y∈Ex⋅M, one has θ(n′n,y)=n′⋅θ(n,y). The mapping θ′:N×(Ex×M)→Y defined by θ′(n,(h,u))=θ(n,μx(h,u)) is continuous; since the mapping μx is universally strict (I, p. 133, Lemma 2), the mapping θ is continuous. It is a bijection of N×(Ex⋅M) onto the subspace Y×X(Ex⋅M) of Y (Lemma 6).
Let z=(k,v)∈Z and (h,u)∈Ex×M be such that q(k,v)=μx(h,u). Put s = h−1φ(k); since φ(k)⋅v = h⋅u, one has s∈ S. Then put λ′(z,(h,u))=kxs−1xh−1gg−1; one has φ(λ′(z,(h,u)))= φ(k)s−1h−1gg−1 = e, hence λ′(z,(h,u))∈ N. Thus a continuous mapping λ′:Z×X(Ex×M)→N is defined. Moreover, for every z and (h,u) as above, one has
θ(λ′(z,(h,u)),h⋅u)=π(kxs−1xh−1gg−1gxg−1h,u)
=π(kxs−1,u)=π(k,s−1⋅u)=π(k,v)=π(z)
and λ′(z,(h,u)) is the unique element n of N such that θ(n,h⋅u)=π(z). In particular there exists a unique mapping
λ:Y×X(Ex⋅M)→N
such that λ(π(z),h⋅u)=λ′(z,(h,u)) for every z∈Z and every (h,u)∈ Ex×M such that q(z)=h⋅u. It is continuous, since the mapping μx is universally strict. It follows that the Ex⋅M-space YEx⋅M deduced from Y by base change, endowed with the operation of N, is a principal fibre space with group N, trivializable.
The lemma is thus proved.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.