Bourbaki

Lemma 7

Tag 01SP, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01SP].

Topologie algébrique, chapter I, § 6. Espaces simplement connexes

Endowed with the action of N, the X-space (Y,p)(Y, p) is a principal left covering. It is trivializable over M.

Let x∈Xx\in X; fix an element g∈Exg\in E_x and an element g‾∈F\overline{g}\in F such that φ(g‾)=g\varphi (\overline{g}) =g. We denote by μx:Ex×M→X\mu_x: E_x\times M\rightarrow X the mapping given by (h,u)↦h⋅u(h, u)\mapsto h\cdot u.

Let n∈Nn\in N, let h,k∈Exh, k\in E_x and let u,v∈Mu, v\in M be such that h⋅u=k⋅vh\cdot u=k\cdot v; put s=g−1h,t=h−1ks=g^{-1}h,t=h^{-1}k and r=st=g−1kr=st=g^{-1}k. Since xx belongs to g⋅M∩h⋅M∩k⋅Mg\cdot M\cap h\cdot M\cap k\cdot M, the pair (s,t)(s, t) belongs to T, whence xsxt=xrx_sx_t=x_r. Hence

π(ngxr,v)=π(ngxsxt,v)=π(ngxs,t⋅v)=π(ngxs,u) \pi (ngx_r, v) =\pi (ngx_sx_t, v) =\pi (ngx_s, t\cdot v) =\pi (ngx_s, u)

There thus exists a unique mapping θ:N×(Ex⋅M)→Y\theta : N\times (E_x\cdot M)\rightarrow Y such that θ(n,h⋅u)=π(ngxg−1h,u)\theta (n, h\cdot u) =\pi (ngx_{g^{-1}h}, u) for every n∈Nn\in N, every h∈Exh\in E_x and every u∈Mu\in M. We have

p(θ(n,h⋅u))=p(π(ngxs,u))=q(ngxs,u)=φ(ngxs)⋅u=gs⋅u=h⋅u p(\theta (n, h\cdot u)) =p(\pi (ngx_s, u)) =q(ngx_s, u) =\varphi (ngx_s)\cdot u=gs\cdot u=h\cdot u

Moreover, for n,n′∈Nn, n'\in N and y∈Ex⋅My\in E_x\cdot M, one has θ(n′n,y)=n′⋅θ(n,y)\theta (n'n, y) =n'\cdot \theta (n, y). The mapping θ′:N×(Ex×M)→Y\theta ': N\times (E_x\times M)\rightarrow Y defined by θ′(n,(h,u))=θ(n,μx(h,u))\theta '(n,(h, u)) =\theta (n, \mu_x(h, u)) is continuous; since the mapping μx\mu_x is universally strict (I, p. 133, Lemma 2), the mapping θ\theta is continuous. It is a bijection of N×(Ex⋅M)N\times (E_x\cdot M) onto the subspace Y×X(Ex⋅M)Y\times_X(E_x\cdot M) of Y (Lemma 6).

Let z=(k,v)∈Zz= (k, v)\in Z and (h,u)∈Ex×M(h, u)\in E_x\times M be such that q(k,v)=μx(h,u)q(k, v) =\mu_x(h, u). Put ss = h−1φ(k‾)h^{-1}\varphi (\overline{k}); since φ(k‾)⋅v\varphi (\overline{k})\cdot v = h⋅uh\cdot u, one has s∈s\in S. Then put λ′(z,(h,u))=kxs−1xh−1gg‾−1\lambda '(z,(h, u)) =kx^{-1}_sx_{h^{-1}g}\overline{g}^{-1}; one has φ(λ′(z,(h,u)))=\varphi (\lambda '(z,(h, u))) = φ(k‾)s−1h−1gg−1\varphi (\overline{k})s^{-1}h^{-1}gg^{-1} = ee, hence λ′(z,(h,u))∈\lambda '(z,(h, u))\in N. Thus a continuous mapping λ′:Z×X(Ex×M)→N\lambda ': Z\times_X(E_x\times M)\rightarrow N is defined. Moreover, for every zz and (h,u)(h, u) as above, one has

θ(λ′(z,(h,u)),h⋅u)=π(kxs−1xh−1gg‾−1gxg−1h,u) \theta (\lambda '(z,(h, u)), h\cdot u) =\pi (kx^{-1}_sx_{h^{-1}g}\overline{g}^{-1}gx_{g^{-1}h}, u)
=π(kxs−1,u)=π(k,s−1⋅u)=π(k,v)=π(z) =\pi (kx^{-1}_s, u) =\pi (k, s^{-1}\cdot u) =\pi (k, v) =\pi (z)

and λ′(z,(h,u))\lambda '(z,(h, u)) is the unique element nn of N such that θ(n,h⋅u)=π(z)\theta (n, h\cdot u) =\pi (z). In particular there exists a unique mapping

λ:Y×X(Ex⋅M)→N \lambda : Y\times_X(E_x\cdot M)\rightarrow N

such that λ(π(z),h⋅u)=λ′(z,(h,u))\lambda (\pi (z), h\cdot u) =\lambda '(z,(h, u)) for every z∈Zz\in Z and every (h,u)∈(h, u)\in Ex×ME_x\times M such that q(z)=h⋅uq(z) =h\cdot u. It is continuous, since the mapping μx\mu_x is universally strict. It follows that the Ex⋅ME_x\cdot M-space YEx⋅MY_{E_x\cdot M} deduced from Y by base change, endowed with the operation of N, is a principal fibre space with group N, trivializable.

The lemma is thus proved.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person.