(ii) the mapping Orb(u): Orb(H) → Orb(H′), deduced from u by passing to orbits, is bijective;
(iii) there exists in each orbit of H a point a such that the homomorphism ua:Ha→Hu(a)′ is surjective.
Then, the groupoid morphism w: Coh(φ,ψ )→ Coh(φ′,ψ′) is a homotopism.
Let G′′ be the groupoid deduced from G′ by contraction of the arrows of a maximal oriented forest. The canonical morphism v′:G′→G′′ is a homotopism (II, p. 184, corollary 2 of prop. 1). The two diagrams
H φ G H′φ′G′
uψv′∘v et IdH′ψ′v′
H′vv′′∘∘ψφ′′G′H′vv′′∘∘ψφ′′G′′
give rise to groupoid morphisms w1′: Coh(φ,ψ )→ Coh(v′∘φ′,v′∘ψ′) and w2′: Coh(φ′,ψ′)→ Coh(v′∘φ′,v′∘ψ′) ; we have w1′=w2′∘w. It is therefore enough to prove that w1′ and w2′ are homotopisms. Since the mappings Som(v′∘v): Som(G) → Som(G′′) and Som(v′): Som(G′)→ Som(G′′) are surjective, it is consequently enough to prove the theorem under the additional assumption that the mapping Som(v) is surjective, an assumption that we shall make throughout the remainder of the proof.
Let us prove successively the following assertions:
– The mapping Orb(w) is bijective;
– For every vertex a of G, the homomorphism wa is surjective;
– For every vertex a of G, the homomorphism wa is injective.
a) By assumption, the mapping Orb(u) is bijective; the same is true of the mapping Orb(v) by II, p. 182, prop. 1, since v is a homotopism. The morphism of quivers from the framework of the pair (φ,ψ) to that of the pair (φ′,ψ′) defined by the mappings Orb(u) and Orb(v) is therefore an isomorphism. In particular, the mapping deduced from it by passing to connected components is bijective. Prop. 4 of II, p. 185 then implies that the mapping Orb(w) is bijective.
(b) Let f′ be an arrow of G′, and let us denote by a′ its origin and by b′ its term. Since the mapping Som(v) is surjective, there exist vertices a and b in G such that a′=v(a) and b′=v(b). Since the morphism v is a homotopism, there exist an arrow f of G joining a to b and an element g∈Ga such that v(g)=f′v(f)−1(II, p. 182, prop. 1), whence f′=v(gf). This proves that the mapping Fl(v) is surjective.
Let us then prove that the mapping Fl(w) is surjective. Its image contains that of Fl(α′), for one has α′∘v=w∘α and the mapping Fl(v) is surjective. Let b be a vertex of H′; let a be a vertex of H such that b and u(a) are in the same orbit of H′, and let f be an arrow of H′ joining u(a) to b. Then,
h′(u(a))⋅(α′∘ψ′)(f)=(α′∘φ′)(f)⋅h′(b)
since h′ is a homotopy joining α′∘φ′ to α′∘ψ′. The arrow h′(u(a))=w(h(a)) belong to the image of Fl(w), and so do the two arrows α′(ψ′(f)) and α′(φ′(f)) by what precedes. It follows that the arrow h′(b) belong to the image of Fl(w), which proves that the image of Fl(w) contains that of h′. By prop. 2 of II, p. 185, the mapping Fl(w) is surjective.
Let g′∈ Coh(φ′,ψ′)u(a). Let g be an arrow of Coh(φ,ψ ) such that w(g)=g′. Let us denote by x and y the origin and the end of g; one has u(x)=u(y)=u(a). Let g1 (resp. g2) be an arrow of G joining a to x (resp. a to y) whose image under v is eu(a). Then, α(g1)gα(g2)−1 is an element of Coh(φ,ψ )a whose image under wa is g′. Hence, for every vertex a of G, the homomorphism wa is surjective.
c) Let us prove that, for every vertex a of G, the homomorphism wa is injective. By considering successively the diagrams
one is thus reduced to treating the two following cases: 1) One has H′=H and u= IdH;2) One has G′=G and v= IdG.
1) Suppose that one has H′=H and u= IdH.
Consider a morphism of groupoids v′:G′→G which is an inverse of v up to homotopy and a homotopy k: Som(G) → Fl(G) joining v′∘v to IdG. By Remark 1 of II, p. 181, the mappings α∘k∘φ and α∘k∘ψ are homotopies joining respectively α∘v′∘φ′ to α∘φ and α∘v′∘ψ′ to α∘ψ. Hence (cf. II, p. 180), the mapping
h1: Som(H) → Fl(Coh(φ,ψ )),
x↦(α∘k∘φ)(x)⋅h(x)⋅((α∘k∘ψ)(x))−1
is a homotopy joining α∘v′∘φ′ to α∘v′∘ψ′. By the universal property of cohomotopers (II, p. 185, prop. 3), there exists a unique groupoid morphism w′: Coh(φ′,ψ′)→ Coh(φ,ψ ) such that α∘v′=w′∘α′ and h1= Fl(w′)∘h′.
H ψφ G α Coh(φ,ψ )
IdHvw
H ψ′φ′G′α′ Coh(φ′,ψ′)
IdHv′w′
H ψφ G α Coh(φ,ψ ) .
In particular one has
α∘v′∘v=w′∘α′∘v=w′∘w∘α
Since k is a homotopy joining v′∘v to IdG,α∘k is a homotopy joining w′∘w∘α to α. Since Fl(w′∘w)∘h= Fl(w′)∘h′=h1, one has, for every vertex x of H,
by definition of h1. By prop. 5 of II, p. 186, applied to the groupoid morphisms w′∘w and IdCoh(φ,ψ), the mapping α∘k is a homotopy joining w′∘w to IdG. In particular, w′∘w is a homotopism.
For every vertex a of G, the group homomorphism (w′∘w)a is therefore bijective (II, p. 182, prop. 1). It follows that the homomorphism wa is injective, whence the result in case A).
2) Suppose that one has G′=G and v= IdG.
Let x be a vertex of H′. Since the mapping Orb(u) is surjective, there exist a vertex a of H and an arrow f of H′ joining u(a) to x. The arrows α(φ′(f))−1,h(a) and α(ψ′(f)) join respectively φ′(x) to φ′(u(a))=φ(a),φ(a) to ψ(a) and ψ′(u(a))=ψ(a) to ψ′(x), and therefore are composable in Coh(φ,ψ ). Put
h2(x)=α(φ′(f))−1⋅h(a)⋅α(ψ′(f))
Let us verify that the resulting arrow h2(x) does not depend on the chosen elements a and f. Let a′ be a vertex of H and let f′ be an arrow of H′ joining u(a′) to x. Since the mapping Orb(u) is injective, the vertices a and a′ of H belong to the same orbit and there exists an arrow c∈ Fl(H) joining a to a′. Then u(c)f′f−1 is a loop at u(a) in H′. By hypothesis (iii), there exists a vertex b of H such that the homomorphism ub is surjective and an arrow c′ of H joining b to a; then, Int(u(c′))(u(c)f′f−1) is a loop at u(b) in H, and is therefore the image under ub of a loop c′′ at b. Consequently, the arrow g=(c′c)−1c′′c′ of H joins the vertex a′ to the vertex a and satisfies f′=u(g)f. We then have
α(φ′(f′))−1h(a′)α(ψ′(f′))
=α(φ′(f))−1α(φ′(u(g)))−1h(a′)α(ψ′(u(g)))α(ψ′(f))
=α(φ′(f))−1α(φ(g))−1h(a′)α(ψ(g))α(ψ′(f))
=α(φ′(f))−1⋅h(a)⋅α(ψ′(f))
since h is a homotopy joining α∘φ to α∘ψ. This proves the announced independence.
By construction, we have h2(u(x))=h(x) for all x∈ Som(H). Thus we have defined a mapping h2 of Som(H′) into Fl(Coh(φ,ψ )). Let c be an arrow of H′, and let x denote its origin and y its end. Let a be a vertex of H and f an arrow of H′ joining u(a) to x. Then fc is an arrow of H′ joining u(a) to y. By definition of h2, we thus have
h2(x)α(ψ′(c))=α(φ′(f))−1h(a)α(ψ′(f))α(ψ′(c))
=α(φ′(c))α(φ′(fc))−1h(a)α(ψ′(fc))
=α(φ′(c))h2(y)
This proves that h2 is a homotopy joining α∘φ′ to α∘ψ′.
By the universal property of cohomotopizers, there exists a unique morphism of groupoids w′: Coh(φ′,ψ′)→ Coh(φ,ψ ) such that w′∘α′=α and h2 = Fl(w′)∘h′. We have w′∘w∘α=w′∘α′=α and Fl(w′∘w)∘h= Fl(w′)∘h′∘ Som(u) =h2∘u=h by definition of h2. By the universal property of cohomotopizers, this implies that we have w′∘w= IdCoh(φ,ψ). In particular, for every a∈ Som(G), the homomorphism wa is injective.
It then follows from Prop. 1 of II, p. 182 that the morphism w is a homotopism, whence the theorem.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.