Bourbaki

Lemma

Tag 01XB, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01XB].

Topologie algébrique, chapter III, § 2. Homotopie et chemins

Let c:I→Xc:\mathbf{I}\rightarrow X be a path and let W be a neighbourhood of cc in the space Cc(I;X)\mathscr{C}_c(\mathbf{I}; X). There exists a real number ε∈]0,1/2]\varepsilon \in ]0,1/2], a neighbourhood V0V_0 of c(0)c(0) and a neighbourhood V1V_1 of c(1)c(1) in X having the following properties: one has c([0,ε])⊂V0,c([1−ε,1])⊂V1c([0, \varepsilon ])\subset V_0,c([1-\varepsilon ,1])\subset V_1, and every path c′:I→Xc':\mathbf{I}\rightarrow X such that

c′(t)∈V0c'(t)\in V_0 for 0⩽t⩽ε0\leqslant t\leqslant \varepsilon,

(2) c′(t)=c(t)c'(t) =c(t) for ε⩽t⩽1−ε\varepsilon \leqslant t\leqslant 1-\varepsilon,

c′(t)∈V1c'(t)\in V_1 for 1−ε⩽t⩽11-\varepsilon \leqslant t\leqslant 1,

belongs to W.

By definition of the topology of compact convergence (TG, X, p. 26, déf. 1), there exists a finite set J, a family (Uj)j∈J(U_j)_{j\in J} of open sets in X and a family (Kj)j∈J(K_j)_{j\in J} of compact subsets of I\mathbf{I} such that the set W′W' of paths c′c' satisfying c′(Kj)⊂Ujc'(K_j)\subset U_j for every index jj is a neighbourhood of cc contained in W. Let us then denote by A0A_0 (resp. A1A_1) the set of indices jj such that 0∈Kj0\in K_j (resp. 1∈Kj1\in K_j); put V0=⋂j∈A0UjV_0=\bigcap_{j\in A_0}U_j and V1=⋂j∈A1UjV_1=\bigcap_{j\in A_1}U_j.

Since the mapping cc is continuous, there exists a real number ε∈\varepsilon \in ]0,1/2]]0,1/2] such that c([0,ε])⊂V0,c([1−ε,1])⊂V1,[0,ε]∩Kj=∅c([0, \varepsilon ])\subset V_0,c([1-\varepsilon ,1])\subset V_1,[0, \varepsilon ]\cap K_j=\emptyset for all j∉A0j\notin A_0 and [1−ε,1]∩Kj=∅[1-\varepsilon ,1]\cap K_j=\emptyset for all j∉A1j\notin A_1. Let then c′c' be a path satisfying the conditions (2). Let us prove that c′∈W′c'\in W'. Let j∈Jj\in J and let t∈Kjt\in K_j. If ε⩽t⩽1−ε,c′(t)=c(t)\varepsilon \leqslant t\leqslant 1-\varepsilon ,c'(t) =c(t) belongs to UjU_j. If 0⩽t⩽ε,c′(t)∈V00\leqslant t\leqslant \varepsilon ,c'(t)\in V_0; by the choice of ε\varepsilon, we have j∈A0j\in A_0, hence c′(t)∈Ujc'(t)\in U_j. Analogously, if 1−ε⩽t⩽11-\varepsilon \leqslant t\leqslant 1, we have j∈A1j\in A_1 and c′(t)∈V1⊂Ujc'(t)\in V_1\subset U_j. Thus, c′(Kj)⊂Ujc'(K_j)\subset U_j and c′c' belongs to W′W', hence to W.

Let us now prove the second assertion of Proposition 10. Suppose that the space X is locally connected by arcs. Let cc be a path in X and let W be a neighbourhood of cc in Cc(I;X)\mathscr{C}_c(\mathbf{I}; X). Let ε,V0\varepsilon ,V_0 and V1V_1 be as in the lemma. Let T0T_0 and T1T_1 be connected by arcs neighbourhoods of c(0)c(0) and c(1)c(1) contained in V0V_0 and V1V_1 respectively. There exists a real number θ\theta such that 0<θ<ε0< \theta < \varepsilon and such that c([0,θ])⊂T0,c([1−θ,1])⊂T1c([0, \theta ])\subset T_0,c([1-\theta ,1])\subset T_1. Let x0∈T0x_0\in T_0 and x1∈T1x_1\in T_1; let c0c_0 be a path of origin x0x_0 and of term c(θ)c(\theta ) in T0T_0 and let c1c_1 be a path of origin x1x_1 and of term c(1−θ)c(1-\theta ) in T1T_1. Put

c0(t/θ)c_0(t/\theta ) for 0⩽t⩽θ0\leqslant t\leqslant \theta,

c′(t)=c(t)c'(t) =c(t) for θ⩽t⩽1−θ\theta \leqslant t\leqslant 1-\theta,

c1((1−t)/θ)c_1((1-t)/\theta ) for 1−θ⩽t⩽11-\theta \leqslant t\leqslant 1.

One thus defines a path c′c' joining x0x_0 to x1x_1 and satisfying the conditions (2). This proves that the image of W in X×XX\times X by the mapping (o,e)(o, e) contains the neighbourhood T0×T1T_0\times T_1 of (c(0),c(1))(c(0), c(1)), whence the proposition.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5-mini, gpt-5-6, gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.