§ 2. Homotopy and paths
1. Paths
Definition 1 01WN
Let X be a topological space. A path in X is called any continuous mapping of into X. The point is called the origin, the point the term of the path . A loop in X is called a path in X whose origin is equal to the term.
Let and be points of X. One says that a path in X joins to if is its origin and is its term.
Definition 2 01WO
Let X be a topological space. One says that paths and in X are juxtaposed if one has . One then calls juxtaposed path of and the path defined by the formula:
for ,
for .
Its origin is that of , its term that of .
Let be a path in X; one calls the path opposite to and denotes by the path defined by for .
one hasIf andare two juxtaposed paths in. For every path in X, one hasXand are, and
Remark 1 01WP
Let X be a topological space and let P be a topological space reduced to a point. Identify with by the projection pr. The set of homotopies between (necessarily continuous) mappings from P into X is then identified with the set of paths in X. To a homotopy joining the constant mapping of image to the constant mapping of image there corresponds a path with origin and term . The preceding identifications are compatible with the notions of juxtaposition and passing to the opposite (cf. III, p. 230).
Remark 2 01WQ
Let X and Y be topological spaces. The canonical mapping
associates to every homotopy joining two mappings and from X into Y a path with origin , term , in the space . If X is a locally compact space, this canonical mapping is bijective (TG, X, p. 28, theorem 3).
Let X be a topological space. One calls the space of paths of X, and denotes by Λ(X), the topological space whose elements are the paths in X and whose topology is that of compact convergence (cf. TG, X, p. 27). If is a point of X, one denotes by the subspace of Λ(X) formed by paths with origin . If is a second point of X, one denotes by the subspace of Λ(X) formed by paths with origin and term .
Proposition 1 01WR
Let X and Z be topological spaces. For a mapping of Z into the space of paths to be continuous, it is necessary and sufficient that the mapping be a continuous mapping of into X. In particular, the mapping of into X is continuous.
The topological space being locally compact, the proposition follows from TG, X, p. 28, th. 3.
We denote and call origin mapping the mapping of Λ(X) into X; we denote and call term mapping the mapping of Λ(X) into X. The mappings and are continuous (TG, X, p. 27, remark 1). The pairs of juxtaposed paths in X are the elements of the fibered product of the X-spaces and .
Proposition 2 01WS
Let X be a topological space. The map which associates with a path the opposite path is a homeomorphism of Λ(X) onto itself. The juxtaposition of paths is a homeomorphism of the space onto Λ(X).
The mapping is a homeomorphism of the space onto itself; the first assertion follows.
Let C denote the fibered product . Let Λ(X) be the mapping and X the mapping . The restrictions of the mapping to and are continuous by virtue of formula (1) and of prop. 1. The mapping is therefore continuous (TG, I, p. 19, prop. 4), as is the mapping (prop. 1). We have and , hence is injective.
Let be a path in X; for , put
and .
The mappings and thus defined are juxtaposed paths in X and we have . Moreover, the mappings and are continuous mappings of the space Λ(X) into itself (prop. 1). It follows that the mapping is a homeomorphism.
Corollary 01WT
Let X be a topological space and let be points of X. The mappings of into and of into are continuous.
2. Arcwise connected spaces
Definition 3 01WU
A topological space X is said to be arcwise connected if for every pair of points of X, there exists a path of origin and of term .
Example 1 01WV
Every interval of , every convex subset of a numerical space or, more generally, of a topological vector space over is arcwise connected.
Proposition 3 01WW
The image by a continuous mapping of an arcwise connected space is arcwise connected.
Let X be a path-connected space, a continuous mapping. Let and be two points of ; let and be points of X such that and . There exists a path in X whose origin is and whose term is . Then, is a path in with origin and term .
Proposition 4 01WX
A path-connected topological space is connected.
Since every interval of is connected, the image of a path is connected (TG, I, p. 82, prop. 4). The empty space is connected. Since a nonempty path-connected space is the union of the images of the paths issuing from one of its points, it is connected (TG, I, p. 81, prop. 2).
Taking into account the identification (III, p. 256, remark 1) of the paths in X with the homotopies between mappings of a topological space P reduced to a point into X, Proposition 1 of III, p. 230 gives:
Proposition 5 01WY
In a topological space, the relation “there exists a path with origin and term ” is an equivalence relation.
The path-connected components of a topological space X are called the equivalence classes for the above relation. A path-connected component is a path-connected space. Let be a point of X. The path-connected component of is the union of the path-connected subspaces of X containing . It is also the union of the images of the paths with origin in X.
Example 2 01WZ
The union of a family of path-connected sets, whose intersection is nonempty, is path-connected (cf. TG, I, p. 81, prop. 2).
Example 3 01X0
A subset of a numerical space (or, more generally, a topological vector space over ) which is star-shaped at one of its points is path-connected.
Let X be a topological space. We denote by the set of path-connected components of X. Let P be a topological space reduced to a point. The mapping from X into [P; X] which, to every point of X, associates the homotopy class of the mapping having image , defines by passing to the quotient a bijection, called canonical, of onto [P; X]. We have . For a nonempty topological space to be path-connected, it is necessary and sufficient that be a set with one element.
Let X and Y be topological spaces and a continuous mapping. The image of every path-connected component C of X is path-connected (III, p. 258, prop. 3), hence contained in a path-connected component of Y. We denote by the mapping which, to a path-connected component C of X, associates the unique path-connected component of Y such that . If we identify and with [P; X] and [P; Y] respectively, the mapping identifies with the mapping from [P; X] into [P; Y]. In particular, if and are homotopic mappings from X into Y, we have (III, p. 230, prop. 2).
Let Z be a topological space and let Z be a continuous mapping; we have . In particular, if Z = X and if and are homotopy inverses of one another up to homotopy, we have (Id) Id and (Id) Id, which proves that and are inverse bijections of one another. A space homotopy equivalent to a path-connected space is therefore itself path-connected. In particular, a space homotopy equivalent to a point is path-connected.
Proposition 6 01X1
Let be a family of topological spaces. The mapping
(pr))
is bijective. In particular, the product space of a family of path-connected spaces is path-connected.
This follows from Proposition 3 of III, p. 231 where one takes for X a space reduced to a point.
3. Locally path-connected spaces
Definition 4 01X2
A topological space is said to be locally path-connected if each of its points possesses a fundamental system of path-connected neighbourhoods.
Proposition 7 01X3
A locally path-connected topological space is locally connected. Its connected components coincide with its path-connected components. In particular, if a locally path-connected topological space is connected, it is path-connected.
The first assertion follows from prop. 4. Let us prove the second assertion. Let X be a locally path-connected topological space and let C be a path-connected component of X. Every point of C possesses a path-connected neighbourhood, hence contained in C; consequently, C is an open subset of X. The path-connected components forming a partition of X, such a component is also closed. Since it is connected (III, p. 258, prop. 4), it is a connected component (TG, I, p. 83). The third assertion follows from the second.
Thus we see that there is no ambiguity in saying that a topological space is connected and locally path-connected.
Corollary 1 01X4
Every connected open subset of a locally path-connected topological space is path-connected.
Corollary 2 01X5
Let B be a locally path-connected topological space and let E be a B-space étalé. The space E is locally path-connected. If it is connected, it is path-connected.
The first assertion follows immediately from def. 4 and the definition of an étale mapping (I, p. 28, def. 2). The second follows from it by prop. 7.
In order that a topological space X be locally path-connected, it is necessary and sufficient that every path-connected component of an open set of X be an open set of X (cf. I, p. 85, proof of prop. 11). If the space X is locally path-connected, every point of X therefore possesses a fundamental system of open path-connected neighbourhoods.
Proposition 8 01X6
Every quotient space of a locally path-connected space is locally path-connected.
Let X be a locally path-connected space, let R be an equivalence relation in X and let be the canonical mapping. It suffices to prove that the path-connected components of an open subset of are open. Let thus A be an open subset of and let C be a path-connected component of A. Let , and let K be the path-connected component of in . The set is path-connected (III, p. 258, prop. 3), contained in A and contains ; hence , whence . This proves that is the union of path-connected components of . Since X is locally path-connected and is open in X is open in X. Consequently, C is open in . This proves the proposition.
Proposition 9 01X7
The product of a family of locally path-connected spaces, connected with the exception of a finite number of them, is locally path-connected.
Let be a family of locally path-connected spaces which are connected, with the exception of a finite number of them. Let be a point of the product space X = . By assumption, a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of in X consists of sets of the form where, for every , is a path-connected neighbourhood of in and where except for a finite set of indices (TG, I, p. 24). These sets being path-connected (III, p. 260, prop. 6), X is locally path-connected.
Corollary 01X8
Every open subset of a numerical space is locally path-connected.
Every point of possesses a basis of neighbourhoods formed by intervals; consequently, is locally path-connected. According to Proposition 9, the numerical space is locally path-connected, for every integer . Moreover, an open subset of a locally path-connected topological space is again path-connected, whence the corollary.
Example 01X9
Let G be the subgroup of formed by the square matrices of order whose determinant is strictly positive. The group G is connected and locally path-connected.
According to A, III, p. 104, prop. 17, the group is generated by the elements (for such that and ). The mappings from into are continuous, their images are connected subsets of ; since they all contain the identity matrix , their union is connected (TG, I, p. 81, prop. 2). Consequently, the group is connected (TG, III, p. 8, prop. 7). Let A be the subgroup of G formed by the matrices of the form diag(1 ), with ; it is connected and one has . It follows that the group G is connected. Since it is the inverse image of by the determinant mapping of into , it is an open subset of ; it is therefore locally arcwise connected (corollary above), as well as arcwise connected (III, p. 261, corollary 1).
Proposition 10 01XA
Let X be a topological space. The mapping of into , which associates with a path in X the pair , is continuous. If the space X is locally arcwise connected, this mapping is open.
We already know that the origin mappings and term of Λ(X) into X are continuous (III, p. 257), whence the first assertion.
Lemma 01XB
Let be a path and let W be a neighbourhood of in the space . There exists a real number , a neighbourhood of and a neighbourhood of in X having the following properties: one has , and every path such that
for ,
(2) for ,
for ,
belongs to W.
By definition of the topology of compact convergence (TG, X, p. 26, déf. 1), there exists a finite set J, a family of open sets in X and a family of compact subsets of such that the set of paths satisfying for every index is a neighbourhood of contained in W. Let us then denote by (resp. ) the set of indices such that (resp. ); put and .
Since the mapping is continuous, there exists a real number such that for all and for all . Let then be a path satisfying the conditions (2). Let us prove that . Let and let . If belongs to . If ; by the choice of , we have , hence . Analogously, if , we have and . Thus, and belongs to , hence to W.
Let us now prove the second assertion of Proposition 10. Suppose that the space X is locally connected by arcs. Let be a path in X and let W be a neighbourhood of in . Let and be as in the lemma. Let and be connected by arcs neighbourhoods of and contained in and respectively. There exists a real number such that and such that . Let and ; let be a path of origin and of term in and let be a path of origin and of term in . Put
for ,
for ,
for .
One thus defines a path joining to and satisfying the conditions (2). This proves that the image of W in by the mapping contains the neighbourhood of , whence the proposition.
Corollary 01XC
Soit X a topological space locally connected by arcs and let be a point of X. The mapping of into X is open.
According to the proposition, the mapping defined by is open and one has . Consequently, the mapping deduced from is open (TG, I, p. 30, prop. 2), as is its composite with the second projection pr.
4. Links between connectedness and connectedness by arcs
A space connected by arcs is connected (III, p. 258, prop. 4). There exist connected spaces, even locally connected spaces, which are not connected by arcs (cf. III, p. 331, exerc. 2 and 4). However:
Proposition 11 01XD
A connected and locally connected topological space, whose topology can be defined by a distance for which it is complete, is connected by arcs.
Let X be a topological space. Call a train in X any nonempty finite sequence of connected open subsets of X such that for . We say that is the length of the train T and that the are its wagons. If X is endowed with a distance compatible with its topology, we call the width of the train T the maximum of the diameters of its wagons. We say that the train joins a point to a point if belongs to the first and to the last wagon. We call a refinement of T any pair formed by a train and a strictly increasing mapping such that and for and .
Lemma 1 01XE
Let X be a connected and locally connected metric space, let and be points of X and let be a real number . There exists in X a train of width joining to .
More precisely, every train T joining to possesses a refinement , where is a train of width joining to .
The relation “there exists a train of width joining to ” is an equivalence relation between and in X. The equivalence class of a point contains every connected open neighbourhood of of diameter , and possesses such a neighbourhood since X is locally connected. The equivalence classes for this relation are therefore open, and consequently also closed. There is at most one of them, since X is connected. This proves the first assertion.
Let be a train in X joining to . Put , and choose for a point in the nonempty set . For , the open set is connected and locally connected and are two of its points; there exists by the preceding paragraph a train in , of width , joining to .
Put . For , put , where is the unique pair of integers such that and . For , put . Then is a train of width in X joining to , and is a refinement of T.
Let us now prove Proposition 11. Equip the connected and locally connected space X with a distance , compatible with its topology, for which it is complete. Let and be points of X. Lemma 1 permits us to construct by induction sequences and such that, for every , is a train of width joining to and is a refinement of .
We can choose by induction, for , a strictly increasing mapping such that and , in such a way that . Define, for , a subset of by putting
The sequence is decreasing: indeed, for every integer , there exists a unique integer such that , and one has
Let . For every , denote by the set of the such that . The set is either one of the cars, or the union of two consecutive cars of the train ; it is therefore a nonempty subset of X, of diameter . The sequence is decreasing. The set of its terms is a Cauchy filter basis. This one converges to a point since the metric space X is complete.
Since belongs to each of the sets , we have ; analogously . Let and let be an integer . The point possesses in a neighbourhood V of one of the following forms: , for an integer such that , or . According to the case, the set is contained in the closure of the first car, of the union of two consecutive cars, or of the last car of the train . It is therefore of diameter , and we have for . This proves that the mapping X is continuous. Thus is a path in X joining to , and X is arcwise connected.
Corollary 1 01XF
A locally connected topological space, whose topology can be defined by a distance for which it is complete, is locally arcwise connected.
Let X be such a space and let U be an open and connected subset of X. According to Lemma 2 below, there exists a distance on U compatible with its topology for which U is complete. Since U is locally connected, it follows from Proposition 11 that U is arcwise connected.
Lemma 2 01XG
Let X be a complete metric space and let U be an open subset of X. There exists a distance on U compatible with its topology for which U is complete.
We shall take up again the arguments of the proof of prop. 2 of TG, IX, p. 57. We may suppose U distinct from X. Let V be the subset of the product formed by the points such that ; the subspace V of is closed and the mapping from V into U is a homeomorphism (TG, IX, p. 13, prop. 3). There exists on a distance compatible with its topology for which is complete (TG, IX, p. 15, cor. 2 and TG, II, p. 17, prop. 10). The space V is complete for the distance induced by (TG, II, p. 16, prop. 8), whence the lemma.
Corollary 2 01XH
A locally compact, locally connected and metrizable topological space is locally arcwise connected. If it is connected, it is arcwise connected.
It suffices to prove the first assertion (III, p. 260, prop. 7). Let X be a locally compact and locally connected metric space. The open, connected and relatively compact subsets of X constitute a basis of the topology of X. Let U be such a set; since U is an open subset of its closure, which is a compact metric space, hence complete, there exists according to Lemma 2 a distance on U compatible with its topology for which U is complete. It follows from prop. 11 of III, p. 264 that U is arcwise connected, whence the corollary.
5. Arcwise continuous mappings
Definition 5 01XI
Let X and Y be topological spaces. A mapping is said to be arcwise continuous if, for every path in X, the mapping is continuous.
Remark 01XJ
Suppose that the space X is arcwise connected. Let be a point of X. For to be arcwise continuous, it suffices that, for every path with origin , the mapping be continuous. Indeed, let be an arbitrary path in X and let be a path in X with origin and with term . If the mapping is continuous, the same is true of the mapping because we have .
A continuous mapping is arcwise continuous. The converse is not always true; the propositions 12 and 13 below provide criteria making it possible to assert that an arcwise continuous mapping is continuous.
Proposition 12 01XK
Let X and Y be topological spaces and let be a mapping. Suppose that the space X is locally arcwise connected and that every point of X possesses a countable fundamental system of neighbourhoods. If the mapping is arcwise continuous, it is continuous.
According to (TG, IX, p. 18), it suffices to prove that, for every point of X and every sequence of points of X which tends to , the sequence tends to . By deleting, if necessary, the first terms of the sequence , we reduce to the case where all the terms of the sequence belong to the same arc-connected neighbourhood of in X. According to the lemma below, there then exists a path such that and for . If the mapping is continuous by arcs, the mapping is continuous and the element is the limit of the sequence , that is to say of the sequence , whence the corollary.
Lemma 01XL
Let X be a topological space connected and locally connected by arcs and let be a point of X. Suppose that the point has a countable fundamental system of neighbourhoods. Then, for every sequence of points of X tending to , there exists a path in X such that and for .
Let be a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of . Put and for every , let be an arc-connected neighbourhood of contained in .
For every integer , denote by the largest integer such that for every . The sequence is increasing by definition; it tends to infinity, because the sequence tends to . For every integer , let be a path with origin and endpoint in . Define a mapping by putting and if . We have for every . The mapping is therefore continuous on every interval of the form with , hence on the interval . If , the point belongs to ; the mapping is therefore continuous at 0.
Proposition 13 01XM
Let be an étale and separated mapping and let be a section of . If the space B is locally path-connected and if the section is path-continuous, it is continuous.
Let be a point of B; let us prove that is continuous at the point . Since is an étale mapping, there exist a neighbourhood V of and a continuous local section of defined in V such that (I, p. 33, prop. 9). Since B is locally path-connected, we may suppose that V is path-connected. For every path in V, with origin , the mappings and are two continuous liftings to B of the mapping and we have . By Corollary 1 of I, p. 34, we have and in particular . Since every point of V is the end point of a path in V with origin , the mappings and coincide in V. The mapping is therefore continuous in V.
Corollary 01XN
Let B be a topological space, let and be two B-spaces. Suppose that the mapping is étale and separated and that the space is locally path-connected. Then every path-continuous mapping such that is continuous.
The mapping pr is étale and separated (I, p. 31, prop. 8 and I, p. 27, prop. 4) and the mapping is a path-continuous section of it. By Proposition 13, it is continuous, hence is continuous.
6. Complements on compact metrizable topological spaces
Let us endow the set with two elements with the discrete topology and the set with the product topology. The topological space is compact (TG, I, p. 63, th. 3), metrizable (TG, IX, p. 15, cor. 2), nonempty, totally disconnected (TG, I, p. 84, prop. 10) and has no isolated point.
Proposition 14 01XO
Every compact, metrizable, nonempty, totally disconnected topological space without isolated point is homeomorphic to .
Let X be such a topological space. Let us endow it with a distance compatible with its topology. Since the space X is compact, it is complete for this distance (TG, II, p. 27, th. 1).
Lemma 3 01XP
Let be a real number . There exists an integer such that, for every integer , X admits a partition formed of nonempty open and closed sets of diameter .
Every point of X admits an open and closed neighbourhood of diameter (TG, II, p. 32, corollary of prop. 6). Since the space X is compact, it has a finite covering by such sets. Choose one, , for which is minimal. We have since X is nonempty. For , denote by the intersection of and the for . Then is a partition of X, formed of nonempty open and closed sets of diameter .
Since X has no isolated point, every nonempty open and closed subset V of X contains at least two points. Since moreover X is compact and totally disconnected, V is the union of two disjoint nonempty open and closed subsets (loc. cit.). It follows, by induction, that for every integer , X admits a partition formed of nonempty open and closed sets of diameter .
Let us now finish the proof of the prop. 14. Every nonempty open and closed subspace of X is a compact, totally disconnected metric space and has no isolated point. Lemma 3 therefore allows us to construct by induction a sequence of finite sets and, for every , a mapping from the set into the set of nonempty open and closed subsets of X of diameter , in such a way that :
(i) For every , there exists an integer such that Card(J) ;
(ii) The family is a partition of X ;
(iii) For every and every , the family is a partition of .
Let us denote by the canonical projection of onto . The sequence C = is a sieve (TG, IX, p. 63, def. 8). The topological space associated with this sieve (TG, IX, p. 63) is identified with the topological space J, product of the discrete topological spaces . The sieve C and the sequence of mappings define a strict sieving of the metric space X (TG, IX, p. 63 and p. 64). The mapping deduced from this sieving is continuous and bijective (TG, IX, p. 65). Since the topological space J is compact (TG, I, p. 63, th. 3) and X is separated, is a homeomorphism (TG, I, p. 63, cor. 2). Since is homeomorphic to for every , J is homeomorphic to (TG, I, p. 25, prop. 2).
Example 01XQ
Let K be the triadic Cantor set (TG, IV, p. 9, example). For every , put and define a mapping from the set into the set of closed intervals of in the following manner: put and ; for every and every and are respectively the “left third” and the “right third” of . If is the interval denoted by in loc. cit., with , it is also the interval , where . For and , put . The family is a partition of K formed by closed sets. These sets are therefore also open in K; they are nonempty and have diameter , because the endpoints of the intervals belong to K. The sequence , where is the canonical projection , is a sieve, and the topological space associated with this sieve is identified with . The sieve C and the sequence of mappings define a strict sieving of the metric space K. The mapping deduced from this sieving is a homeomorphism, given by the formula
Corollary 01XR
Let X be a metrizable, compact and nonempty topological space. There exists a continuous and surjective mapping from into X.
Every compact and metrizable topological space is homeomorphic to a necessarily closed subspace of the topological space (TG, IX, p. 18, prop. 12 and p. 21, prop. 16). Let A be a closed subspace of and a homeomorphism of A onto X.
Let K = and, for K, put ; we have . The mapping thus resulting is surjective (TG, IV, p. 42) and continuous. Indeed, if two elements and of K have the same coordinates of index , we have . Let denote the mapping of into ; it is continuous and surjective. The topological space is compact (TG, I, p. 63, th. 3), metrizable (TG, IX, p. 15, cor. 2) and totally disconnected (TG, I, p. 84, prop. 10) and the same is true of its closed subspace ; the latter is nonempty since the mappings and are surjective.
Then, the space is homeomorphic to (prop. 14), since it is a compact, metrizable, totally disconnected topological space without isolated point and the mapping of into X is continuous surjective.
7. Topological properties of the image of a path
Proposition 15 01XS
The image of a path in a separated topological space is a compact, metrizable, connected and locally connected by arcs topological space.
Let X be a separated topological space and a continuous mapping. Let R denote the equivalence relation in . The topological space is separated (TG, I, p. 63, cor. 1), the space is quasi-compact (TG, I, p. 62, th. 2), hence the bijection deduced from is a homeomorphism (TG, I, p. 63, cor. 2). Consequently, the space is compact, metrizable (TG, IX, p. 22, prop. 17), connected (TG, I, p. 82, prop. 6) and locally connected by arcs (III, p. 261, prop. 8).
Theorem 1 (Hahn and Mazurkiewicz) 01XT
Every metrizable, compact, nonempty, connected and locally connected topological space is homeomorphic to a quotient space of the segment .
Lemma 4 01XU
Let K be a compact topological space and let be a set of open subsets of K covering K. There exists an entourage V of the uniform structure of K (TG, II, p. 27, th. 1) such that, for every , is contained in one of the sets belonging to .
For every point of K, there exists an entourage of the uniform structure of K such that is contained in one of the sets belonging to . Let be an entourage of the uniform structure of K such that is contained in . The interiors of the cover K; since the space K is compact, there exists a finite subset F of K such that the family is a covering of K (TG, I, p. 59). Let V denote the intersection of the family ; the set V is an entourage of the uniform structure of K. For every point , there exists a point such that belongs to . Consequently, the set
is contained in , hence in one of the sets belonging to .
Lemma 5 01XV
Let X and Y be uniform spaces and a mapping of X into Y. Let be a set of closed subsets of X covering X and possessing the following properties:
(i) There exists a set which meets all the sets ;
(ii) For every entourage U of the uniform structure of X, there are only a finite number of sets which are not small of order U;
(iii) For every entourage V of the uniform structure of Y, there are only a finite number of sets such that is not small of order V.
Thus, if the restriction of to each of the sets is continuous, is continuous.
Let be a point of X. Let us prove that is continuous at . There exists a set such that . The restriction of to is continuous (TG, I, p. 19, prop. 4). By replacing by , we reduce to the case where .
Let V be an entourage of the uniform structure of Y. Choose
an entourage of this same uniform structure such that . Since the restriction of to is continuous, there exists an entourage U of the uniform structure of X such that for every . Let be an entourage of the uniform structure of X
such that . Let A denote the union of , of the sets which are not small of order and of those such that is not small of order . By assumption, A is the union of a finite number of sets belonging to , and the restriction of to A is continuous (loc. cit.). There therefore exists a neighbourhood W of in X, contained in , such that for . To conclude, it will suffice to prove that one also has for every point . Let be such a point. Let F be an element of such that . By definition of A, F is small of order and is small of order . By assumption, F meets . Let . We have since F is small of order and since W
is contained in , whence and fortiori . But then, since belongs to , we have . Moreover is small of order , whence . It follows that we have
and finally . This concludes the proof of lemma 5.
Let us now prove theorem 1. Let X be a compact nonempty, connected and locally connected metric space. Such a space is connected by arcs and locally connected by arcs (III, p. 267, corollary 2). According to the corollary and the example of III, p. 270, there exists a continuous and surjective mapping from the triadic Cantor set K (TG, IV, p. 9, example) into X. We shall construct a continuous extension of to , which will prove theorem 1.
Let be a real number . The open and arcwise connected subsets of X of diameter cover X. Let denote the set of their inverse images by : it is a set of open sets of K covering K. According to Lemma 4 of III, p. 272, there exists a real number such that every closed ball of K of radius is contained in an element of . In particular, if and are points of K such that , there exists a path in X joining to whose image has diameter .
The preceding paragraph makes it possible to construct by induction a strictly increasing sequence of integers 0 possessing the following property: for every integer and every pair of points of K such that , there exists a path in X joining to whose image has diameter . The complement of K in is the union of a family of pairwise disjoint open intervals, where runs through the set of integers and the set of integers between 1 and (TG, IV, p. 9, example). Consider one of these intervals and write it . The points and belong to K and we have . The function is defined on the interval in the following way: one chooses a path in X joining to , whose image has diameter if , and one sets for . The function thus defined extends . It is continuous on K as well as on each of the closed intervals . The latter meet K. Moreover, for every real number , there are only finitely many intervals of length , and there are only finitely many intervals whose images by have diameter . According to Lemma 5, the mapping is continuous.
8. Characterizations of the interval
Lemma 6 01XW
Let D be a countable totally ordered set, not reduced to one element, possessing a smallest and a greatest element. Suppose that D has no gap (E, III, p. 73, exerc. 19), that is to say that every open interval , where and are elements of D such that , is nonempty. There then exists an isomorphism of ordered sets from onto D.
Let be the smallest element and the greatest element of D. By assumption, we have and for every . The set D is totally ordered, is not empty and has no smallest element; it is therefore infinite (E, III, p. 34, cor. 1 of prop. 3). The sets and D, infinite and countable, are equipotent to .
Choose bijections and of onto and D respectively, such that . There exists a unique strictly increasing mapping possessing the following properties: we have and ; for , we have , where is the smallest natural number for which the mapping of into D which coincides with in and maps onto is strictly increasing. These properties indeed define by induction on , the existence of the integer being ensured by the fact that D is without gaps.
Since the mapping is strictly increasing and is totally ordered, defines an isomorphism of ordered sets from onto its image (E, III, p. 14, prop. 11). It remains for us to prove that is surjective. For this, let us prove by induction that belongs to the image of for every .
One has and . Suppose that we have and that, for , there exists such that . We have and , since is injective. Consider the smallest integer for which does not belong to and the mapping of into D which coincides with in and maps onto is strictly increasing; such an integer exists since has no gap. Let be the mapping of into D which coincides with in and which maps onto . Let us prove that it is strictly increasing. Let ; by definition of the integer , there exists such that , or and , or and . Suppose ; we then have , whence since is strictly increasing, then ; moreover, . Analogously, if , we obtain and . Since itself is strictly increasing, it follows that the mapping is strictly increasing.
If is the integer such that , we have , by definition of . If we had , we would have , whence , since is injective, which contradicts the definition of . Thus, and , which proves that belongs to the image of and completes by induction the proof of the surjectivity of .
Proposition 16 01XX
Let E be a totally ordered set not reduced to one element. Suppose that every subset of E has a supremum and that there exists a countable subset of E which meets every open interval , where and are elements of E such that . There then exists an isomorphism of ordered sets of onto E.
Since and E each have a supremum in E, E has a smallest element and a greatest element . These are distinct since E is not reduced to one element. Let be a countable subset of E which meets every open interval of E of the form , with . Put . The set D is totally ordered and without gaps. By lemma 6, there exists an isomorphism of ordered sets of onto D.
For every , let be the supremum of in E. For every , let be the supremum of in . The mappings and thus defined are increasing, coincides with in and coincides with in D.
We therefore have for every . Let . If one had , the interval would contain a point of D and the relations would contradict the fact that is increasing. Analogously, one does not have . We therefore have , which proves that is the identity mapping of E. One proves analogously that is the identity mapping of . Thus, and are reciprocal isomorphisms of ordered sets.
Remark 01XY
Let E be a totally ordered set. The set of open intervals of E (bounded or not) is stable under finite intersection. It is a basis of a topology on E (TG, I, p. 91, exerc. 5). The topology is identical with the topology induced on by that of . It follows that, in prop. 16, every isomorphism of ordered sets of onto E is a homeomorphism of onto the topological space obtained by endowing E with the topology .
Corollary 01XZ
Let R be an equivalence relation in . The following conditions are equivalent:
(i) Every equivalence class according to R is a closed interval of , distinct from ;
(ii) There exists an increasing surjective mapping such that R is the equivalence relation associated with .
Such a mapping , when it exists, is continuous and defines by passing to the quotient a homeomorphism of onto .
We shall denote by the canonical surjection.
Suppose condition (i) is satisfied. For A and B equivalence classes following R, write if one has for every and every . In , the relation « A = B or » is an order relation. Indeed, it is reflexive; it is antisymmetric since one cannot have simultaneously and ; it is transitive since the relations and imply . If A and B are distinct elements of , they are disjoint closed intervals of , and one then has either , or . Endowed with the order relation thus defined, is therefore totally ordered. The mapping is increasing.
The set is not reduced to one element, by virtue of (i).
Let F be a subset of . Let us prove that F has a least upper bound in . Put ; denote by the least upper bound of in and by A the equivalence class of following R. Since is an upper bound of in , A is an upper bound of F in . Conversely, let be an upper bound of F; put sup(B). Every element of is then bounded above by . We therefore have . Since the equivalence classes following R are closed intervals, belongs to A and to B. Consequently we have . This proves that A is the least upper bound of F.
Let A and B be elements of such that . Let be the greatest lower bound of A and the least upper bound of B. Since and , we have . The equivalence class following R of any element of is an element of the interval of . Since meets , its image by meets .
We have thus proved that the totally ordered set satisfies the hypotheses of prop. 16. There therefore exists an isomorphism of ordered sets . The mapping is a surjective and increasing mapping of onto and the equivalence relation associated with is the relation R; this proves that condition (ii) is satisfied.
Conversely, suppose that condition (ii) is satisfied. Let be an increasing and surjective mapping such that R is the equivalence relation associated with .
Let be a point of . The set is an interval of , since the mapping is increasing. Since is surjective, A is neither empty nor equal to . Let be the greatest lower bound of A in . We have . If , there exist and such that since is surjective. Since is increasing and majorizes every element of A and we have , which contradicts the assumption that is the greatest lower bound of A. We therefore have , that is to say . Analogously one proves that A contains its greatest lower bound. The set A is therefore a closed interval of , distinct from . This proves that condition (i) is satisfied.
Let us now prove that the mapping is continuous. It suffices for this to prove that, for every , the sets and are open. Let be the greatest lower bound of ; we have . If satisfies , we necessarily have ; conversely, if , we have and since is the greatest lower bound of . Consequently , which proves that the inverse image by of the interval is open. Analogously one proves that that of is open. It follows that the mapping is continuous.
The mapping deduced from by passing to the quotient is then continuous and bijective. Since is compact, is quasi-compact (TG, I, p. 62, th. 2) and is a homeomorphism (TG, I, p. 63, cor. 2).
Proposition 17 01Y0
Let X be a connected and compact topological space. Let be a point of X, let U be a nonempty open and closed subset of X .
(a) The closure of U in X is equal to and is connected.
b) Let be a point of X distinct from , and let be a nonempty open and closed subset of X . If and if , then . Conversely, if and X , then .
c) There exists a point of U such that X is connected.
Let us prove assertion a). Denote by V the complement of U in X . Since U is closed in X , V is open in X and fortiori in X. We therefore have . Analogously, U is an open subset of X. Since X is connected, U is not closed in X, whence the equality . We likewise have .
Let F and G be disjoint closed subsets of such that . Suppose that and let us prove that F is empty; one would reason in the same way if . The set is a closed subset of X, disjoint from F, and we have . Since X is connected and G is not empty, F is empty. This proves that is connected.
Let us prove b). Suppose that and that . By assertion a), we have and . Since and , the subsets U and have a common point. Still by a), is a connected subset of X; since it is contained in X and it meets the open and closed subset U of the latter, we have , which was to be proved. The second assertion follows from the first by considering the complements in X of and respectively.
Let us finally prove assertion c). Suppose, by contradiction, that, for every , the set X is not connected and choose subsets and , open and closed in X , disjoint and nonempty, such that X and . By assertion b), applied to the open and closed subsets U, of X and X respectively, we have for every . Let and be points of U such that ; we then have . Again by assertion b), applied to the open and closed subsets and of X and X , the relation implies the relation . Consequently, the relations and are equivalent.
The set of subsets S of U such that is of finite character (E, III, p. 34), since the space X is compact. By E, III, p. 35, th. 1, there exists a maximal subset S of U such that is not empty. Let be a point of C. For every element of S, we have , whence and then . Consequently, we have and then, by maximality of S, . For every such that , we also have and . By maximality of S, , hence , which contradicts the hypothesis that is a nonempty open and closed subset of X .
Corollary 01Y1
Let X be a compact connected topological space, let N be the set of points of X whose complement is connected. The set X is the unique connected and compact subset of X which contains N.
Let S be a connected and compact subset of X such that . Suppose that S and let . By hypothesis, X is not connected; there therefore exist open and closed subsets U and V of X , disjoint and nonempty, such that X . We may suppose that . We have and and these spaces are connected (III, p. 278, prop. 17, a)). By assertion c) of this proposition, there exists such that X is connected, which contradicts the inclusions .
Lemma 7 01Y2
Soit T un espace topologique localement connexe. Soit un ensemble filtrant croissant de parties ouvertes de T, de réunion T. Pour et , notons la composante connexe de dans U si et posons si . Pour tout est la composante connexe de dans T.
For , put . We have . The sets are open and connected and the same is true of since we have if (TG, I, p. 81, prop. 2). Let be points of T such that . Let be a point of ; let be such that and let be such that . Since is increasing filtrant, there exists which contains . Then, , hence . More generally, one has for every such that , hence . This proves that the sets of the form form a partition of T into open connected subsets. Consequently, for every , is the connected component of in T.
Theorem 2 01Y3
Let X be a compact connected topological space possessing a countable everywhere dense subset. Let be distinct points of X. The following conditions are equivalent:
(i) There exists a homeomorphism such that and ;
(ii) Every connected subset of X which contains is equal to X ;
(iii) The space X is locally connected and every connected compact subset of X which contains is equal to X ;
(iv) For every , the space X is not connected.
Assertion (i) implies all the others.
Let be a point of X . Since X contains , assertion (ii) implies that it is not a connected subset of X, so that (ii) implies (iv).
Let us show that (iii) implies (iv). Suppose the assumptions of (iii) are satisfied. Let and suppose that X is connected. Let T be the space X and let be the set of subsets of T of the form X-V, where V is a compact neighbourhood of . By Lemma 7, there exists a compact neighbourhood V of such that and belong to the same connected component of X-V. They belong in particular to the same connected component of ; this is a compact connected set of X, distinct from X, which contradicts the assumption (iii).
It remains to prove that assertion (iv) implies condition (i).
Let be a point of X and let U, V be open and closed, disjoint and nonempty subsets of X, such that X. According to III, p. 278, prop. 17, c), there exists a point of U (resp. of V) whose complement in X is connected. Since X admits only two such points, and , one of them, say , is contained in U and the other in V. According to loc. cit., a nonempty open and closed subset, of U, contains a point of , hence contains . Applying this to , it follows that . Consequently, U is connected; it is the connected component of in X. Analogously, V is the connected component of in X .
For every , denote thus by and the connected components of and in X . From what precedes, they are open and closed in X , disjoint, and their union is equal to X .
Denote by the relation in X defined in the following way: on the one hand, and for every , on the other hand, if and belong to X , then if . For and in X , the subsets and have the point in common, the relation is in fact equivalent to the assertion III, p. 278, prop. 17, b)). It follows that the relation is an order relation in X.
Let and be points of X such that one does not have . Necessarily, and , and . If or , one has . Suppose then that and are distinct from and . Since the parts and have the point in common, one has the inclusion loc. cit.), whence, taking the closures of the complements, and, fortiori, . The relation in the space X is therefore a total order relation. For every , one moreover has and ; for , one has . When run through the points of X , the sets , the sets and the sets form a basis of a topology on X. Let be the topological space corresponding to it and let be the identical mapping of X. Since, for every , the sets and are open in X, the mapping is continuous.
The space is separated. Indeed, let and be distinct points of such that . The parts and are open neighbourhoods of and ; if they have a common point , and are then disjoint open neighbourhoods of and . Since X is compact, the mapping is therefore a homeomorphism (TG, I, p. 63, cor. 2).
Consequently, the image by of a countable everywhere dense subset of X meets every nonempty open interval of the ordered set . It follows then from Prop. 16 of III, p. 276 that there exists an isomorphism of the ordered set onto . According to the remark following this proposition, this isomorphism is a homeomorphism of onto the topological space . The mapping is then a homeomorphism of onto X which maps 0 onto and 1 onto .
9. Injective paths
Proposition 18 01Y4
Let X be a separated topological space. Let and be distinct points of X which belong to the same arcwise connected component of X. There exists an injective path joining to in X.
Let be a path joining to in X. Let be the set of open subsets U of such that for every connected component of U.
Lemma 8 01Y5
The set , ordered by inclusion, is inductive.
Let be a totally ordered subset of . Let us prove that the union V of the sets belonging to is an element of , that is to say that, for every connected component of V, one has .
Let be a point of . Let be the set of the such that ; for such a U, denote by the connected component of in U. One has if U and are elements of such that . Since the union for of the is equal to according to Lemma 7 of III, p. 280, one has lim and lim , where the limits are taken following the filtered set . Since the mapping is continuous and the topological space X is separated, the equalities for every imply that , which was to be proved.
By virtue of E, III, p. 20, Th. 2, there exists an open subset U belonging to which is maximal for the relation of inclusion.
Let be the mapping defined as follows. If , we put ; otherwise, denoting by the connected component of in U, we put , so that the mapping is constant with image .
Prop. 18 follows from the following lemma.
Lemma 9 01Y6
There exists a continuous, increasing and surjective mapping and an injective path joining to such that .
Let us first prove that the mapping is continuous. Let be a point of . If is constant in a neighbourhood of , hence continuous at . Suppose that and let W be an open neighbourhood of in X. Let V be an open interval in containing such that ; such an interval exists since is continuous at . Let us prove that . Let ; if , we have , hence . Suppose then that and let be the connected component of in U. Observe that does not contain . Consequently, if , we have whence and . The same argument shows that if . Thus, is continuous at .
Let and be points of such that and . Let us prove that . Put ; it is an open subset of .
If belongs to U, let denote the greatest lower bound in of the connected component of in U; put if does not belong to U. Analogously, if belongs to U, let denote the least upper bound in of the connected component of in U; put if does not belong to U. Then, is a connected component of and one has . Since the connected components of distinct from are connected components of U, the open set is an element of . Since U is a maximal element of for the relation of inclusion, one has and is contained in U. This proves that is constant on the interval . The fibres of are therefore intervals of , and these intervals are closed because is continuous.
Let R be the equivalence relation associated with and let be the canonical surjection of onto . There exists a unique continuous mapping of into X such that ; this mapping is injective. By the corollary, III, p. 276, of prop. 16, there exists a mapping , increasing, continuous and surjective, such that R is the equivalence relation associated with . Since the space is compact and the space X is separated, the mapping is closed, hence strict (I, p. 18, example 2). It defines by passing to the quotient a homeomorphism of onto . Then, the mapping of into X is an injective path of origin and of term .
10. Lifting of paths
Theorem 3 01Y7
Let I be an interval of and let X be a nonempty and separated topological space. Let be a continuous, open and proper mapping whose fibres are totally disconnected (TG, I, p. 83). The mapping is surjective. For every point of X, it possesses a continuous section such that .
The set is an open, closed (TG, I, p. 72, prop. 1), nonempty subset of I. Since I is connected, one has ; the mapping is therefore surjective.
For every pair such that , let denote the set of pairs such that and belong to one and the same connected component of .
Lemma 10 01Y8
Let be points of I such that .
a) The set is closed in .
b) One has pr and pr.
c) Let such that . If belongs to and belongs to , then belongs to .
The set is compact (TG, I, p. 77, Prop. 7). Hence, for a pair to belong to , it is necessary and sufficient that every open and closed subset of which contains should contain (TG, II, p. 32, Prop. 6).
Put . For every open and closed subset U of Y, the set is closed in . The intersection of these sets is equal to , whence a).
Let . Let denote the set of open and closed neighbourhoods of in Y. The mapping of Y into deduced from by passing to subspaces is open and proper (I, p. 17, Prop. 8), hence also closed. It follows that, for every set U belonging to is a nonempty open and closed subset of ; since the interval is connected, one has and in particular . Hence, is a decreasing filtering family of nonempty closed subsets of the compact space . The intersection of this family is not empty (TG, I, p. 59); let be one of its elements. One has . We have proved the relation pr. The relation pr is deduced from it by replacing , I by , .
Under the hypotheses of c), the pair belongs to , the set is contained in a connected part C of and the set is contained in a connected part of . Then, is a connected part of (TG, I, p. 81, prop. 2) and contains , whence the relation .
Let us return to the proof of theorem 3. Each fibre of the mapping is compact (TG, I, p. 77, prop. 7). According to Tychonoff's theorem (TG, I, p. 63, th. 3), the product space is compact. Let be the set of elements of K such that is equal to and such that one has for every pair of elements of I such that . Theorem 3 follows from the following lemma.
Lemma 11 01Y9
a) The set is not empty.
b) Let be an element of . The mapping from I into X is a continuous section of such that .
For every finite subset S of I containing the point , denote by the set of elements of K satisfying the relation and the relations for every pair of elements of S such that . The sets are closed in K (lemma 10, a)) and form a decreasing filtering family of subsets of K, whose intersection is . To prove that is not empty, it is enough to prove that, for every finite subset S of I containing the point , the set is not empty (TG, I, p. 59).
Let S be such a subset; order its elements in a strictly increasing sequence and denote by the integer such that . Put . Lemma 10, b), permits us to construct by induction elements , for , and by descending induction elements for , in such a way that one has for every integer such that . According to lemma 10, c), one has for every pair of elements of S such that . Since the mapping is surjective, we can choose for every an element . The family thus constructed belongs to , hence is not empty.
Let us prove b). By definition of is a section of such that . Let ; let us prove the continuity of at the point . Let U be an open neighbourhood of in X. Since is a compact space (TG, I, p. 77, prop. 7) and totally disconnected, possesses in an open and closed neighbourhood C, contained in U (TG, II, p. 32, corollary). The sets C and are closed in , hence compact, and they are disjoint. Since X is separated, they possess in X open and disjoint neighbourhoods V and (TG, I, p. 61, prop. 3). The set is an open neighbourhood of the fibre in X; since the mapping is closed (TG, I, p. 72, prop. 1), contains a set of the form , where is an open interval containing I, p. 75, lemma). Put . The set W is open in ; it is also closed in since one has . Let . The closed interval of I with endpoints and is contained in J. By assumption, belongs to if and belongs to if . There therefore exists a connected subset of containing . Consequently, the point belongs to every open and closed subset of which contains , hence in particular to W; fortiori, belongs to U. We therefore have , which proves the continuity of at the point .
Corollary 01YA
Let X and B be topological spaces and let be a continuous, open, proper and separated mapping whose fibres are totally disconnected. Let I be an interval of , let be a continuous mapping, let be a point of I and let be a point of X such that . There exists a continuous mapping such that and .
Posons and denote by I and X the canonical projections. The mapping is continuous, open, proper and separated (I, p. 17, prop. 8 and p. 27, prop. 4). Since the space I is separated, the space is separated (I, p. 26, remark 3). The fibres of are totally disconnected ( I, p. 10, corollary, a)). According to Theorem 3, there exists a continuous section of which takes in the value . The mapping of I into X is continuous, we have and , whence the corollary.
Theorem 4 01YB
Let X be a topological space, let G be a discrete group operating properly in X and let be the canonical mapping. Let I be an interval of , let be a continuous mapping, let be a point of I and let be a point of X such that . There exists a continuous mapping such that and .
We first treat the case where I is a closed bounded interval of .
According to TG, III, p. 29, prop. 3, the space X is separated.
Let be a point of and let such that . The stabilizer of is a finite subgroup of G; moreover, there exist neighbourhoods of in X and of in such that is stable by if and induces a homeomorphism of onto (TG, III, p. 32, proposition 8). Moreover, for every induces a homeomorphism of onto . Since I is compact, there exist integers and such that and a finite sequence of elements of I such that , and such that, for every is contained in an open set of constructed as above.
Soit the unique element of such that . Let be the canonical mapping of onto ; by passing to the quotient, the mapping induces a homeomorphism of onto such that . The mapping is proper (TG, III, p. 29, prop. 3), open (TG, I, p. 31, example 1) and separated, since X is separated. Its fibres are totally disconnected, since they are finite. According to the corollary, III, p. 286, there exists a continuous mapping such that .
In the same way, by induction on the integer , one constructs a point , a continuous mapping whose image is contained in such that and such that if .
Analogously, by decreasing induction on the integer , one constructs a point , a continuous mapping whose image is contained in such that and such that if .
There exists a unique mapping X which coincides with in for . It is continuous (TG, I, p. 19, prop. 4). It is a continuous lifting of to X such that .
This proves the theorem when I is compact. In the general case, there exist sequences and such that is stationary with limit inf(I), is stationary with limit sup(I), and such that (resp. ) is constant if I has a smallest (resp. greatest) element. From what precedes, there exists for every integer a continuous lifting of to X, a continuous lifting of to X such that . There exists a unique mapping which coincides with in and with in , for every . It is continuous (loc. cit.) and it is a continuous lifting of to X such that . The theorem is thus proved.
Example 1 01YC
Let X be a separated topological space and let G be a finite group, endowed with the discrete topology, which operates continuously in X. The operation is then proper (TG, III, p. 28, prop. 2). The assertion of theorem 4 follows directly from the corollary of theorem 3.
Example 2 01YD
Soit an integer . Let denote the set of monic polynomials of degree , endowed with the topology for which the mapping is a homeomorphism of onto . The mapping of into defined by is continuous. The symmetric group operates on by permutation of the factors and defines by passing to the quotient a homeomorphism of onto (TG, VIII, p. 22, prop. 1, I, p. 23, cor. 1 and TG, VIII, p. 20). We therefore deduce the following statement:
Let I be an interval of , let be a sequence of continuous mappings from I into , let be a point of I and let be a sequence of complex numbers such that one has . There exists a sequence of continuous mappings from I into such that one has for and for every .
Exercises
See the exercises for § 2.