Bourbaki

Lemma 5

Tag 01XV, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01XV].

Topologie algébrique, chapter III, § 2. Homotopie et chemins

Let X and Y be uniform spaces and ff a mapping of X into Y. Let F\mathscr{F} be a set of closed subsets of X covering X and possessing the following properties:

(i) There exists a set F0∈FF_0\in \mathscr{F} which meets all the sets F∈FF\in \mathscr{F};

(ii) For every entourage U of the uniform structure of X, there are only a finite number of sets F∈FF\in \mathscr{F} which are not small of order U;

(iii) For every entourage V of the uniform structure of Y, there are only a finite number of sets F∈FF\in \mathscr{F} such that f(F)f(F) is not small of order V.

Thus, if the restriction of ff to each of the sets F∈FF\in \mathscr{F} is continuous, ff is continuous.

Let xx be a point of X. Let us prove that ff is continuous at xx. There exists a set F1∈FF_1\in \mathscr{F} such that x∈F1x\in F_1. The restriction of ff to F0∪F1F_0\cup F_1 is continuous (TG, I, p. 19, prop. 4). By replacing F0F_0 by F0∪F1F_0\cup F_1, we reduce to the case where x∈F0x\in F_0.

Let V be an entourage of the uniform structure of Y. Choose

an entourage V′V' of this same uniform structure such that V′2⊂V\overset{2}{V'}\subset V. Since the restriction of ff to F0F_0 is continuous, there exists an entourage U of the uniform structure of X such that f(z)∈V′(f(x))f(z)\in V'(f(x)) for every z∈F0∩U(x)z\in F_0\cap U(x). Let U′U' be an entourage of the uniform structure of X

such that U′2⊂U\overset{2}{U'}\subset U. Let A denote the union of F0F_0, of the sets F∈FF\in \mathscr{F} which are not small of order U′U' and of those such that f(F)f(F) is not small of order V′V'. By assumption, A is the union of a finite number of sets belonging to F\mathscr{F}, and the restriction of ff to A is continuous (loc. cit.). There therefore exists a neighbourhood W of xx in X, contained in U′(x)U'(x), such that f(y)∈V(f(x))f(y)\in V(f(x)) for y∈A∩Wy\in A\cap W. To conclude, it will suffice to prove that one also has f(y)∈V(f(x))f(y)\in V(f(x)) for every point y∈(X−A)∩Wy\in (X-A)\cap W. Let yy be such a point. Let F be an element of F\mathscr{F} such that y∈Fy\in F. By definition of A, F is small of order U′U' and f(F)f(F) is small of order V′V'. By assumption, F meets F0F_0. Let z∈F∩F0z\in F\cap F_0. We have z∈U′(y)z\in U'(y) since F is small of order U′U' and y∈U′(x)y\in U'(x) since W

is contained in U′(x)U'(x), whence z∈U′2(x)z\in \overset{2}{U'}(x) and fortiori z∈U(x)z\in U(x). But then, since zz belongs to F0F_0, we have f(z)∈V′(f(x))f(z)\in V'(f(x)). Moreover f(F)f(F) is small of order V′V', whence f(y)∈V′(f(z))f(y)\in V'(f(z)). It follows that we have

f(y)∈V′2(f(x))f(y)\in \overset{2}{V'}(f(x)) and finally f(y)∈V(f(x))f(y)\in V(f(x)). This concludes the proof of lemma 5.

Let us now prove theorem 1. Let X be a compact nonempty, connected and locally connected metric space. Such a space is connected by arcs and locally connected by arcs (III, p. 267, corollary 2). According to the corollary and the example of III, p. 270, there exists a continuous and surjective mapping ff from the triadic Cantor set K (TG, IV, p. 9, example) into X. We shall construct a continuous extension gg of ff to [0,1][0,1], which will prove theorem 1.

Let ε\varepsilon be a real number >0>0. The open and arcwise connected subsets of X of diameter ⩽ε\leqslant \varepsilon cover X. Let R\mathscr{R} denote the set of their inverse images by ff: it is a set of open sets of K covering K. According to Lemma 4 of III, p. 272, there exists a real number α>0\alpha >0 such that every closed ball of K of radius α\alpha is contained in an element of R\mathscr{R}. In particular, if tt and t′t' are points of K such that ∣t−t′∣⩽α|t-t'|\leqslant \alpha, there exists a path in X joining f(t)f(t) to f(t′)f(t') whose image has diameter ⩽ε\leqslant \varepsilon.

The preceding paragraph makes it possible to construct by induction a strictly increasing sequence (nk)k⩾0(n_k)_{k\geqslant 0} of integers ⩾\geqslant 0 possessing the following property: for every integer k⩾0k\geqslant 0 and every pair (t,t′)(t, t') of points of K such that ∣t−t′∣⩽3−nk|t-t'|\leqslant 3^{-n_k}, there exists a path in X joining f(t)f(t) to f(t′)f(t') whose image has diameter ⩽2−k\leqslant 2^{-k}. The complement of K in [0,1][0,1] is the union of a family (In,p)(I_{n,p}) of pairwise disjoint open intervals, where nn runs through the set of integers ⩾0\geqslant 0 and pp the set of integers between 1 and 2n2^n (TG, IV, p. 9, example). Consider one of these intervals In,pI_{n,p} and write it ]a,b[]a, b[. The points aa and bb belong to K and we have b−a=3−n−1b-a= 3^{-n-1}. The function gg is defined on the interval In,pI_{n,p} in the following way: one chooses a path cc in X joining f(a)f(a) to f(b)f(b), whose image has diameter ⩽2−k\leqslant 2^{-k} if nk⩽n<nk+1n_k\leqslant n < n_{k+1}, and one sets g(t)=c(t−ab−a)g(t) =c(\frac{t-a}{b-a}) for t∈In,pt\in I_{n,p}. The function g:[0,1]→Xg: [0,1]\rightarrow X thus defined extends ff. It is continuous on K as well as on each of the closed intervals In,p‾\overline{I_{n,p}}. The latter meet K. Moreover, for every real number ε>0\varepsilon >0, there are only finitely many intervals In,p‾\overline{I_{n,p}} of length >ε> \varepsilon, and there are only finitely many intervals In,p‾\overline{I_{n,p}} whose images by gg have diameter >ε> \varepsilon. According to Lemma 5, the mapping gg is continuous.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5-mini, gpt-5-6, gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.