Lemma 6
Tag 01XW, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01XW].
Topologie algébrique, chapter III, § 2. Homotopie et chemins
Let D be a countable totally ordered set, not reduced to one element, possessing a smallest and a greatest element. Suppose that D has no gap (E, III, p. 73, exerc. 19), that is to say that every open interval , where and are elements of D such that , is nonempty. There then exists an isomorphism of ordered sets from onto D.
Let be the smallest element and the greatest element of D. By assumption, we have and for every . The set D is totally ordered, is not empty and has no smallest element; it is therefore infinite (E, III, p. 34, cor. 1 of prop. 3). The sets and D, infinite and countable, are equipotent to .
Choose bijections and of onto and D respectively, such that . There exists a unique strictly increasing mapping possessing the following properties: we have and ; for , we have , where is the smallest natural number for which the mapping of into D which coincides with in and maps onto is strictly increasing. These properties indeed define by induction on , the existence of the integer being ensured by the fact that D is without gaps.
Since the mapping is strictly increasing and is totally ordered, defines an isomorphism of ordered sets from onto its image (E, III, p. 14, prop. 11). It remains for us to prove that is surjective. For this, let us prove by induction that belongs to the image of for every .
One has and . Suppose that we have and that, for , there exists such that . We have and , since is injective. Consider the smallest integer for which does not belong to and the mapping of into D which coincides with in and maps onto is strictly increasing; such an integer exists since has no gap. Let be the mapping of into D which coincides with in and which maps onto . Let us prove that it is strictly increasing. Let ; by definition of the integer , there exists such that , or and , or and . Suppose ; we then have , whence since is strictly increasing, then ; moreover, . Analogously, if , we obtain and . Since itself is strictly increasing, it follows that the mapping is strictly increasing.
If is the integer such that , we have , by definition of . If we had , we would have , whence , since is injective, which contradicts the definition of . Thus, and , which proves that belongs to the image of and completes by induction the proof of the surjectivity of .
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.