Bourbaki

Lemma 6

Tag 01XW, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01XW].

Topologie algébrique, chapter III, § 2. Homotopie et chemins

Let D be a countable totally ordered set, not reduced to one element, possessing a smallest and a greatest element. Suppose that D has no gap (E, III, p. 73, exerc. 19), that is to say that every open interval ]x,y[]x, y[, where xx and yy are elements of D such that x<yx < y, is nonempty. There then exists an isomorphism of ordered sets from I∩Q\mathbf{I}\cap \mathbf{Q} onto D.

Let aa be the smallest element and bb the greatest element of D. By assumption, we have b=a̸b=\not a and ]a,x[=∅̸]a, x[=\not\emptyset for every x∈D−{a}x\in D-\{a\}. The set D−{a}-\{a\} is totally ordered, is not empty and has no smallest element; it is therefore infinite (E, III, p. 34, cor. 1 of prop. 3). The sets I∩Q\mathbf{I}\cap \mathbf{Q} and D, infinite and countable, are equipotent to N\mathbf{N}.

Choose bijections n↦ann\mapsto a_n and n↦bnn\mapsto b_n of N\mathbf{N} onto I∩Q\mathbf{I}\cap \mathbf{Q} and D respectively, such that a0=0,a1=1,b0=a,b1=ba_0= 0,a_1= 1,b_0=a,b_1=b. There exists a unique strictly increasing mapping f:I∩Q→Df:\mathbf{I}\cap \mathbf{Q}\rightarrow D possessing the following properties: we have f(0)=af(0) =a and f(1)=bf(1) =b; for n⩾2n\geqslant 2, we have f(an)=bmf(a_n) =b_m, where mm is the smallest natural number for which the mapping of {a0,...,an}\{a_0, . . . , a_n\} into D which coincides with ff in {a0,...,an−1}\{a_0, . . . , a_{n-1}\} and maps ana_n onto bmb_m is strictly increasing. These properties indeed define f(an)f(a_n) by induction on nn, the existence of the integer mm being ensured by the fact that D is without gaps.

Since the mapping ff is strictly increasing and I∩Q\mathbf{I}\cap \mathbf{Q} is totally ordered, ff defines an isomorphism of ordered sets from I∩Q\mathbf{I}\cap \mathbf{Q} onto its image (E, III, p. 14, prop. 11). It remains for us to prove that ff is surjective. For this, let us prove by induction that bmb_m belongs to the image of ff for every m∈Nm\in \mathbf{N}.

One has b0=f(0)b_0=f(0) and b1=f(1)b_1=f(1). Suppose that we have m⩾2m\geqslant 2 and that, for 0⩽k⩽m−10\leqslant k\leqslant m-1, there exists ck∈I∩Qc_k\in \mathbf{I}\cap \mathbf{Q} such that f(ck)=bkf(c_k) =b_k. We have c0=0c_0= 0 and c1=1c_1= 1, since ff is injective. Consider the smallest integer n∈Nn\in \mathbf{N} for which ana_n does not belong to {c0,...,cm−1}\{c_0, . . . , c_{m-1}\} and the mapping gg of {c0,...,cm−1,an}\{c_0, . . . , c_{m-1}, a_n\} into D which coincides with ff in {c0,...,cm−1}\{c_0, . . . , c_{m-1}\} and maps ana_n onto bmb_m is strictly increasing; such an integer exists since I∩Q\mathbf{I}\cap \mathbf{Q} has no gap. Let f′f' be the mapping of {a0,...,an}\{a_0, . . . , a_n\} into D which coincides with ff in {a0,...,an−1}\{a_0, . . . , a_{n-1}\} and which maps ana_n onto bmb_m. Let us prove that it is strictly increasing. Let j∈{0,...,n−1}j\in \{0, . . . , n-1\}; by definition of the integer nn, there exists k∈{0,...,m−1}k\in \{0, . . . , m-1\} such that aj=cka_j=c_k, or aj<cka_j< c_k and bm⩾f(ck)b_m\geqslant f(c_k), or aj>cka_j> c_k and bm⩽f(ck)b_m\leqslant f(c_k). Suppose bk<bmb_k< b_m; we then have g(ck)=f(ck)=bk<bm=g(an)g(c_k) =f(c_k) =b_k< b_m=g(a_n), whence ck<anc_k< a_n since gg is strictly increasing, then aj⩽ck<ana_j\leqslant c_k< a_n; moreover, f′(aj)=f'(a_j) = f(aj)⩽f(ck)=bk<bm=f′(an)f(a_j)\leqslant f(c_k) =b_k< b_m=f'(a_n). Analogously, if bk>bmb_k> b_m, we obtain an<ck⩽aja_n< c_k\leqslant a_j and f′(aj)=f(aj)⩾f(ck)=bk>bm=f′(an)f'(a_j) =f(a_j)\geqslant f(c_k) =b_k> b_m=f'(a_n). Since ff itself is strictly increasing, it follows that the mapping f′f' is strictly increasing.

If m′m' is the integer such that f(an)=bm′f(a_n) =b_{m'}, we have m′⩽mm'\leqslant m, by definition of ff. If we had m′<mm'< m, we would have f(an)=bm′=f(cm′)f(a_n) =b_{m'}=f(c_{m'}), whence an=cm′a_n=c_{m'}, since ff is injective, which contradicts the definition of ana_n. Thus, m′=mm'=m and f(an)=bmf(a_n) =b_m, which proves that bmb_m belongs to the image of ff and completes by induction the proof of the surjectivity of ff.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5-mini, gpt-5-6, gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.