Bourbaki

Theorem 4

Tag 01YB, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01YB].

Topologie algébrique, chapter III, § 2. Homotopie et chemins

Let X be a topological space, let G be a discrete group operating properly in X and let p:X→X/Gp: X\rightarrow X/G be the canonical mapping. Let I be an interval of R\mathbf{R}, let f:I→X/Gf: I\rightarrow X/G be a continuous mapping, let aa be a point of I and let xx be a point of X such that f(a)=p(x)f(a) =p(x). There exists a continuous mapping φ:I→X\varphi : I\rightarrow X such that p∘φ=fp\circ \varphi =f and φ(a)=x\varphi (a) =x.

We first treat the case where I is a closed bounded interval of R\mathbf{R}.

According to TG, III, p. 29, prop. 3, the space X is separated.

Let yy be a point of X/GX/G and let x∈Xx\in X such that y=p(x)y=p(x). The stabilizer KxK_x of xx is a finite subgroup of G; moreover, there exist neighbourhoods UxU_x of xx in X and VyV_y of yy in X/GX/G such that UxU_x is stable by Kx,gUx∩Ux=∅K_x,gU_x\cap U_x=\emptyset if g∉Kxg\notin K_x and pp induces a homeomorphism of Ux/KxU_x/K_x onto VyV_y (TG, III, p. 32, proposition 8). Moreover, for every g∈G,pg\in G,p induces a homeomorphism of gUxgU_x onto VyV_y. Since I is compact, there exist integers mm and nn such that m⩽0⩽nm\leqslant 0\leqslant n and a finite sequence (ai)m⩽i⩽n(a_i)_{m\leqslant i\leqslant n} of elements of I such that a0=a,I=[am,an]a_0=a,I = [a_m, a_n], and such that, for every i∈{m,...,n−1},f([ai,ai+1])i\in \{m, . . . , n-1\},f([a_i, a_{i+1}]) is contained in an open set VyiV_{y_i} of X/GX/G constructed as above.

Soit x0x_0 the unique element of p−1(y0)\overset{-1}{p}(y_0) such that x∈Ux0x\in U_{x_0}. Let q0q_0 be the canonical mapping of Ux0U_{x_0} onto Ux0/Kx0U_{x_0}/K_{x_0}; by passing to the quotient, the mapping pp induces a homeomorphism i0i_0 of Ux0/Kx0U_{x_0}/K_{x_0} onto Vy0V_{y_0} such that i0∘q0=p∣Ux0i_0\circ q_0=p|U_{x_0}. The mapping q0q_0 is proper (TG, III, p. 29, prop. 3), open (TG, I, p. 31, example 1) and separated, since X is separated. Its fibres are totally disconnected, since they are finite. According to the corollary, III, p. 286, there exists a continuous mapping φ0:[a0,a1]→Ux0\varphi_0: [a_0, a_1]\rightarrow U_{x_0} such that p∘φ0=f∣[a0,a1]p\circ \varphi_0=f|[a_0, a_1].

In the same way, by induction on the integer i∈{0,...,n−1}i\in \{0, . . . , n-1\}, one constructs a point xi∈p−1(yi)x_i\in \overset{-1}{p}(y_i), a continuous mapping φi:[ai,ai+1]→X\varphi_i: [a_i, a_{i+1}]\rightarrow X whose image is contained in UxiU_{x_i} such that p∘φi=f∣[ai,ai+1]p\circ \varphi_i=f|[a_i, a_{i+1}] and such that φi(ai+1)=φi+1(ai+1)\varphi_i(a_{i+1}) =\varphi_{i+1}(a_{i+1}) if 0⩽i<n−10\leqslant i < n-1.

Analogously, by decreasing induction on the integer i∈{m,...,−1}i\in \{m, . . . ,-1\}, one constructs a point xi∈p−1(yi)x_i\in \overset{-1}{p}(y_i), a continuous mapping φi:[ai,ai+1]→X\varphi_i: [a_i, a_{i+1}]\rightarrow X whose image is contained in UxiU_{x_i} such that p∘φi=p\circ \varphi_i= f∣[ai,ai+1]f|[a_i, a_{i+1}] and such that φi(ai+1)=φi+1(ai+1)\varphi_i(a_{i+1}) =\varphi_{i+1}(a_{i+1}) if m⩽i<0m\leqslant i <0.

There exists a unique mapping φ:I→\varphi : I\rightarrow X which coincides with φi\varphi_i in [ai,ai+1][a_i, a_{i+1}] for m⩽i<nm\leqslant i < n. It is continuous (TG, I, p. 19, prop. 4). It is a continuous lifting of ff to X such that φ(a)=x\varphi (a) =x.

This proves the theorem when I is compact. In the general case, there exist sequences (an)n∈N(a_n)_{n\in\mathbf{N}} and (bn)n∈N(b_n)_{n\in\mathbf{N}} such that (an)(a_n) is stationary with limit inf(I), (bn)(b_n) is stationary with limit sup(I),a=a0=b0,a=a_0=b_0, and such that (an)(a_n) (resp. (bn)(b_n)) is constant if I has a smallest (resp. greatest) element. From what precedes, there exists for every integer n∈Nn\in \mathbf{N} a continuous lifting φn\varphi_n of f∣[an,an+1]f|[a_n, a_{n+1}] to X, a continuous lifting φn′\varphi '_n of f∣[bn+1],bn]f|[b_{n+1}], b_n] to X such that φ0(a0)=φ0′(b0)=x\varphi_0(a_0) =\varphi '_0(b_0) =x φn+1(an+1)=φn(an+1),φn+1′(bn+1)=φn′(bn+1)\varphi_{n+1}(a_{n+1}) =\varphi_n(a_{n+1}),\varphi '_{n+1}(b_{n+1}) =\varphi '_n(b_{n+1}). There exists a unique mapping φ:I→X\varphi : I\rightarrow X which coincides with φn\varphi_n in [an,an+1][a_n, a_{n+1}] and with φn′\varphi '_n in [bn+1,bn][b_{n+1}, b_n], for every n∈Nn\in \mathbf{N}. It is continuous (loc. cit.) and it is a continuous lifting of ff to X such that phi(a)=xphi(a) =x. The theorem is thus proved.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5-mini, gpt-5-6, gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.