Let α,β,γ be real numbers such that α⩽β⩽γ, let B be a topological space and let p:E→B×[α,γ] be a continuous mapping. Put B0=B×[α,β], B1=B×[β,γ], E0=p−1(B0), E1= p−1(B1) and denote by p0:E0→B0,p1:E1→B1 the mappings deduced from p. If (E0,p0) and (E1,p1) are trivializable fibre spaces, the same is true of (E,p).
Let g0:E0→B0×F0 and g1:E1→B1×F1 be trivializations of E0 and E1 respectively. Let g0′ and g1′ denote the trivializations of the B×{β}-fibered space p−1(B×{β}) deduced from g0 and g1 by restriction. The mapping h=g0′∘(g1′)−1 is a B×{β}-isomorphism of B×{β}×F1 onto B×{β}×F0. Define a continuous mapping h′ of B×F1 into F0 by putting h′(a,y)= pr3∘h(a,β,y) for (a,y)∈B×F1. For (a,t,y)∈B×[β,γ]×F1, put H(a,t,y)=(a,t,h′(a,y)). The mapping H resulting is a (B×[β,γ])-isomorphism of B×[β,γ]×F1 onto B×[β,γ]×F0, and one has g0∣p−1(B×{β})=H∘g1∣p−1(B×{β}). There therefore exists a continuous mapping g:E→B×[α,γ]×F0 such that g∣E0=g0 and g∣E1=H∘g1. The mapping g is an isomorphism of B×[α,γ]-spaces, hence E is trivializable.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.