Bourbaki

Lemma 2

Tag 0243, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0243].

Topologie algébrique, chapter IV, § 6. Espaces classifiants

Let α,β,γ\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma be real numbers such that α⩽β⩽γ\alpha \leqslant \beta \leqslant \gamma, let B be a topological space and let p:E→B×[α,γ]p: E\rightarrow B\times [\alpha , \gamma ] be a continuous mapping. Put B0=B×[α,β]B_0= B\times [\alpha , \beta ], B1=B×[β,γ]B_1= B\times [\beta , \gamma ], E0=p−1(B0)E_0=\overset{-1}{p}(B_0), E1=E_1= p−1(B1)\overset{-1}{p}(B_1) and denote by p0:E0→B0,p1:E1→B1p_0: E_0\rightarrow B_0,p_1: E_1\rightarrow B_1 the mappings deduced from pp. If (E0,p0)(E_0, p_0) and (E1,p1)(E_1, p_1) are trivializable fibre spaces, the same is true of (E,p)(E, p).

Let g0:E0→B0×F0g_0: E_0\rightarrow B_0\times F_0 and g1:E1→B1×F1g_1: E_1\rightarrow B_1\times F_1 be trivializations of E0E_0 and E1E_1 respectively. Let g0′g'_0 and g1′g'_1 denote the trivializations of the B×{β}B\times \{\beta \}-fibered space p−1(B×{β})\overset{-1}{p}(B\times \{\beta \}) deduced from g0g_0 and g1g_1 by restriction. The mapping h=g0′∘(g1′)−1h=g'_0\circ (g'_1)^{-1} is a B×{β}B\times \{\beta \}-isomorphism of B×{β}×F1B\times \{\beta \} \times F_1 onto B×{β}×F0B\times \{\beta \} \times F_0. Define a continuous mapping h′h' of B×F1B\times F_1 into F0F_0 by putting h′(a,y)=h'(a, y) = pr3∘h(a,β,y)_3\circ h(a, \beta , y) for (a,y)∈B×F1(a, y)\in B\times F_1. For (a,t,y)∈B×[β,γ]×F1(a, t, y)\in B\times [\beta , \gamma ]\times F_1, put H(a,t,y)=(a,t,h′(a,y))H(a, t, y) = (a, t, h'(a, y)). The mapping H resulting is a (B×[β,γ])(B\times [\beta , \gamma ])-isomorphism of B×[β,γ]×F1B\times [\beta , \gamma ]\times F_1 onto B×[β,γ]×F0B\times [\beta , \gamma ]\times F_0, and one has g0∣p−1(B×{β})=H∘g1∣p−1(B×{β})g_0|\overset{-1}{p}(B\times \{\beta \}) = H\circ g_1|\overset{-1}{p}(B\times \{\beta \}). There therefore exists a continuous mapping g:E→B×[α,γ]×F0g: E\rightarrow B\times [\alpha , \gamma ]\times F_0 such that g∣E0=g0g|E_0=g_0 and g∣E1=H∘g1g|E_1= H\circ g_1. The mapping gg is an isomorphism of B×[α,γ]B\times [\alpha , \gamma ]-spaces, hence E is trivializable.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person.