Bourbaki

Remark 1

Tag 024M, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 024M].

Topologie algébrique, chapter IV, § 6. Espaces classifiants

If G is a separated topological group, ι(G)\iota (G) is closed in G∗G^*.

Let indeed h∈G∗h\in G^* be such that h∉ι(G)h\notin \iota (G), let (ti)0⩽i⩽n(t_i)_{0\leqslant i\leqslant n} be a sequence adapted to hh, put ε=\varepsilon = min1⩽i⩽n(ti−ti−1)_{1\leqslant i\leqslant n}(t_i-t_{i-1}). Let V be a neighbourhood of ee in G such that h(ti)−1h(tj)∉Vh(t_i)^{-1}h(t_j)\notin V, for every pair (i,j)(i, j) of integers such that 0⩽i,j⩽n−10\leqslant i, j\leqslant n-1 and h(ti)=h̸(tj)h(t_i)=\not h(t_j); there exists one since G is separated. Let W be a neighbourhood of ee in G such that W⋅W−1⊂VW\cdot W^{-1}\subset V. Let us prove that then hWε∗hW^*_{\varepsilon} does not meet ι(G)\iota (G).

Let us reason by contradiction. Let ff be an element of Wε∗W^*_{\varepsilon} and gg an element of G such that hfhf = ι(g)\iota (g). We therefore have f(t)=h(t)−1gf(t) =h(t)^{-1}g for all t∈[0,1[t\in [0,1[, so that the sequence (ti)(t_i) is also adapted to the function ff. If the value taken by ff on the interval [ti−1,ti[[t_{i-1}, t_i[ does not belong to W, then ti−ti−1<εt_i-t_{i-1}< \varepsilon, since f∈Wε∗f\in W^*_{\varepsilon}. This inequality being false, by definition of ε\varepsilon, we have f(t)∈Wf(t)\in W for all t∈[0,1[t\in [0,1[. Let ii and jj then be elements of {0,...,n−1}\{0, . . . , n-1\} such that h(ti)=h̸(tj)h(t_i)=\not h(t_j); we have

h(ti)−1h(tj)=f(ti)g−1gf(tj)−1=f(ti)f(tj)−1∈W⋅W−1 h(t_i)^{-1}h(t_j) =f(t_i)g^{-1}gf(t_j)^{-1}=f(t_i)f(t_j)^{-1}\in W\cdot W^{-1}

which contradicts the choice of W. The subgroup ι(G)\iota (G) of G∗G^* is therefore closed.

Suppose that G is a metrisable topological group and let dd be a distance on G which defines its topology. Let hh and h′∈G∗h'\in G^* and let (ti)0⩽i⩽n(t_i)_{0\leqslant i\leqslant n} be a sequence adapted to hh and h′h'. The real number

∑i=1n(ti−ti−1)d(h(ti−1),h′(ti−1)) \sum_{i=1}^n(t_i-t_{i-1})d(h(t_{i-1}), h'(t_{i-1}))

does not depend on the sequence (ti)(t_i) chosen; let us denote it by d∗(h,h′)d^*(h, h').

Let us prove that d∗d^* is a distance on G∗G^*. We have d∗(h,h′)=d^*(h, h') = d∗(h′,h)d^*(h', h) for h,h′∈G∗h,h'\in G^*, and d∗(h,h)=0d^*(h, h) = 0 for all h∈G∗h\in G^*. Conversely, let hh and h′h' be elements of G∗G^* such that d∗(h,h′)=0d^*(h, h') = 0. Let (ti)0⩽i⩽n(t_i)_{0\leqslant i\leqslant n} be a sequence adapted to hh and h′h'. Since

0=d∗(h,h′)=∑i=1n(ti−ti−1)d(h(ti−1),h′(ti−1)) 0 =d^*(h, h') =\sum_{i=1}^n(t_i-t_{i-1})d(h(t_{i-1}), h'(t_{i-1}))

and all the terms of this sum are positive or zero, we have d(h(ti−1),h′(ti−1))=0d(h(t_{i-1}), h'(t_{i-1})) = 0 for all i∈{1,...,n}i\in \{1, . . . , n\}, whence h=h′h=h'. Finally, let h,h′,h′′h,h',h'' be elements of G∗G^* and let (ti)0⩽i⩽n(t_i)_{0\leqslant i\leqslant n} be a sequence adapted to each of them. Then,

d∗(h,h′′)=∑i=1n(ti−ti−1)d(h(ti−1),h′′(ti−1)) d^*(h, h'') =\sum_{i=1}^n(t_i-t_{i-1})d(h(t_{i-1}), h''(t_{i-1}))
⩽∑i=1n(ti−ti−1)(d(h(ti−1),h′(ti−1))+d(h(ti−1),h′′(ti−1))) \leqslant \sum_{i=1}^n(t_i-t_{i-1})(d(h(t_{i-1}), h'(t_{i-1}))+d(h(t_{i-1}), h''(t_{i-1})))
=d∗(h,h′)+d∗(h,h′′) =d^*(h, h') +d^*(h, h'')

therefore d∗d^* satisfies the triangle inequality.

This distance d∗d^* is invariant under right (resp. left) translations if dd is.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person.