Bourbaki

Proposition 7

Tag 024N, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 024N].

Topologie algébrique, chapter IV, § 6. Espaces classifiants

Suppose that G is a metrizable topological group. Then the topological group G∗G^* is metrizable. More precisely, if dd is a bounded distance on G which defines its topology, the topology of G∗G^* is defined by the distance d∗d^*.

Let dd be a distance on G which defines its topology. Then, the mapping d′d' given by d′(h,h′)=d'(h, h') = inf(d(h,h′),1d(h, h'),1) is a bounded distance on G which also defines its topology (TG, IX, p. 3). It is therefore enough to prove that d∗d^* defines the topology of G∗G^* under the assumption that dd is bounded.

Let V be a neighbourhood of ee in G and let ε\varepsilon be a strictly positive real number. Let δ\delta be a strictly positive real number such that V contains the ball B(e,δ)B(e, \delta ). Let h∈G∗h\in G^* and let (ti)0⩽i⩽n(t_i)_{0\leqslant i\leqslant n} be a sequence adapted to hh. Then,

pV(h)=∑h(tii−=11)∉Vn(ti−ti−1) p_V(h) =\sum_{h(t_ii_-=1_1)\notin V}^n(t_i-t_{i-1})
⩽∑n(ti−ti−1)d(h(ti−1),e)δ \leqslant \sum^n(t_i-t_{i-1})\frac{d(h(t_{i-1}), e)}{\delta}
i=1 i=1
d(h(ti−1),e)⩾δd(h(t_{i-1}),e)\geqslant \delta
⩽d∗(h,e∗)δ \leqslant \frac{d^*(h, e^*)}{\delta}

Consequently, the ball B(e∗,εδ)B(e^*, \varepsilon \delta ) in G∗G^* is contained in Vε∗V_{\varepsilon}^*.

Conversely, let δ\delta be a strictly positive real number and let Δ be a strictly positive upper bound for the diameter of G. Let V be a neighbourhood of ee in G contained in the ball B(e,δ/2)B(e, \delta /2). For a function h∈G∗h\in G^* and a sequence (ti)0⩽i⩽n(t_i)_{0\leqslant i\leqslant n} adapted to hh, one has

d∗(h,e∗)=∑i=1n(ti−ti−1)d(h(ti−1),e) d^*(h, e^*) =\sum_{i=1}^n(t_i-t_{i-1})d(h(t_{i-1}), e)

= ∑i=1n(ti−ti−1)d(h(ti−1),e)\sum_{i=1}^n(t_i-t_{i-1})d(h(t_{i-1}), e)

d(h(ti−1),e)⩽δ/2d(h(t_{i-1}),e)\leqslant \delta /2

+ ∑i=1n(ti−ti−1)d(h(ti−1),e)\sum_{i=1}^n(t_i-t_{i-1})d(h(t_{i-1}), e)

d(h(ti−1),e)>δ/2d(h(t_{i-1}),e)>\delta /2 ⩽δ2+Δ∑i=1n(ti−ti−1)\leqslant \frac{\delta}{2}+ \Delta \sum_{i=1}^n(t_i-t_{i-1}) h(ti−1)∉Vh(t_{i-1})\notin V
⩽δ2+ΔpV(h) \leqslant \frac{\delta}{2}+ \Delta p_V(h)

The preceding inequality implies that, for every element hh of Vδ/2Δ∗V_{\delta /2\Delta}^*, one has d∗(h,e∗)⩽δd^*(h, e^*)\leqslant \delta. Consequently, every ball of G∗G^* for the distance d∗d^* contains a neighbourhood of the identity element.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person.