Bourbaki

Proposition 2

Tag 02G3, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02G3].

Théories spectrales, chapter I, § 7. Spectre des endomorphismes des espaces de Banach

Let E be a Banach space and uu an endomorphism of E. Let E1E_1 and E2E_2 be closed subspaces of E invariant under uu such that E=E1⊕E2E = E_1\oplus E_2. Suppose that the endomorphisms u1u_1 and u2u_2 of E1E_1 and E2E_2 induced by uu have disjoint spectra H1=H_1= Sp(u1u_1) and H2H_2 = Sp(u2u_2). Then Sp(uu) =H1∪H2= H_1\cup H_2 and eH1(u)e_{H_1}(u) is the projector with image E1E_1 and kernel E2E_2. In particular, one has EH1=E1E_{H_1}= E_1 and EH2=E2E_{H_2}= E_2.

One has Sp(uu) =H1∪H2(= H_1\cup H_2(I, p. 128, Lemma 1). Since the sets H1H_1 and H2H_2 are compact, they are open and closed in Sp(uu). For every holomorphic function ff in a neighbourhood of Sp(uu), the endomorphism f(u)f(u) leaves E1E_1 and E2E_2 invariant and coincides in E1E_1 with f(u1)f(u_1) and in E2E_2 with f(u2)f(u_2) (loc. cit.). Take in particular for ff the germ of holomorphic function fH1f_{H_1} which is equal to 1 in a neighbourhood of H1H_1 and 0 in a neighbourhood of H2H_2 (cf. No. 12 of I, p. 81); then fH1(u1)f_{H_1}(u_1) is the identity mapping of E1E_1 since fH1f_{H_1} = 1 in a neighbourhood of H1=H_1= Sp(u1u_1), and fH1(u2)f_{H_1}(u_2) is zero since fH1=0f_{H_1}= 0 in a neighbourhood of H2H_2. Hence eH1(u)=fH1(u)e_{H_1}(u) =f_{H_1}(u) is the projector with image E1E_1 and kernel E2E_2, and therefore one has E1=EH1E_1= E_{H_1} and E2=EH2E_2= E_{H_2}.

Let E be a Banach space and uu an endomorphism of E. Let (Hi)i∈I(H_i)_{i\in I} be a finite family of open and closed subsets of Sp(uu), pairwise disjoint, and let H be their union. Relations (15) and (16) of I, p. 81 imply the following assertions :

a) The family of projectors (eHi(u))i∈I(e_{H_i}(u))_{i\in I} is orthogonal (that is to say, eHi(u)eHj(u)=0e_{H_i}(u)e_{H_j}(u) = 0 for all (i,j)(i, j) in I2I^2 such that i≠ji\not=j, cf. A, II, p. 18, Def. 7) and its sum is eH(u)e_H(u);

b) The vector space EHE_H is the topological direct sum of the family (EHi)i∈I(E_{H_i})_{i\in I};

c) For every j∈Ij\in I, one has ESp(u)−Hj=ESp(u)−H⊕⨁i≠jEHiE_{Sp(u)-H_j}= E_{Sp(u)-H}\oplus \bigoplus_{i\not=j}E_{H_i};

d) The vector space ESp(u)−HE_{Sp(u)-H} is the intersection of the family (ESp(u)−Hi)i∈I(E_{Sp(u)-H_i})_{i\in I}.

When H = Sp(uu), the decomposition as topological direct sum ⨁i∈IEHi\bigoplus_{i\in I}E_{H_i} of E is called the spectral decomposition of E associated with uu and with the finite partition (Hi)i∈I(H_i)_{i\in I} of Sp(uu).

Let ff be an element of O\mathscr{O}(Sp(uu)). The spectrum of the endomorphism f(u)f(u) of E is the image under ff of the spectrum of u(u(I, p. 75, Prop. 8). Let L be a subset open and closed in Sp(f(u)f(u)). The set H of elements λ∈\lambda \in Sp(uu) such that f(λ)f(\lambda ) belongs to L is open and closed in Sp(uu), and one has eL(f(u))=eH(u)e_L(f(u)) =e_H(u) since fL∘f=fHf_L\circ f=f_H in O\mathscr{O}(Sp(uu)) (loc. cit.).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.