Bourbaki

Lemma 3

Tag 02G8, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02G8].

Théories spectrales, chapter I, § 7. Spectre des endomorphismes des espaces de Banach

Let E be a Hilbert space and p∈L(E)p\in \mathscr{L}(E) a projector. The following assertions are equivalent:

(i) The projector pp is an orthogonal projector, that is to say Ker(pp) == Im(pp)∘^{\circ} (EVT, V, p. 13);

(ii) The projector pp is hermitian;

(iii) The projector pp is normal;

(iv) One has Ker(pp)⊂\subset Ker(p∗p^*) ;

(v) One has Im(pp)⊂\subset Im(p∗p^*) ;

(vi) The projector pp is positive;

(vii) One has ∥p∥⩽1\|p\|\leqslant 1.

Let us first recall that Ker(p∗p^*) == Im(pp)∘^{\circ} and Ker(pp) == Im(p∗p^*)∘^{\circ} (EVT, V, p. 41, prop. 4). Moreover, the image of pp (resp. p∗p^*) is closed, since it coincides with the kernel of 1−p1-p (resp. 1−p∗1-p^*). Therefore one has

(1) Im(pp) == Ker(p∗p^*)∘^{\circ}, Im(p∗p^*) == Ker(pp)∘^{\circ}.

(i) =⇒=\Rightarrow (ii):p∗:p^* is a projector with kernel Im(pp)∘=^{\circ}= Ker(pp) and whose image is Im(p∗p^*)∘=^{\circ}= Ker(pp) == Im(pp)∘^{\circ}; hence p∗=pp^*=p.

(ii) =⇒=\Rightarrow (iii) since every hermitian endomorphism is normal.

(iii) =⇒=\Rightarrow (iv) : since pp is normal, one has ∥p(x)∥2=∥p∗(x)∥2\|p(x)\|^2=\|p^*(x)\|^2 for all xx in E (EVT, V, p. 43, Prop. 7), whence the required inclusion.

(iv) =⇒=\Rightarrow (v) follows from equalities (1) above.

(v) =⇒=\Rightarrow (vi) : for all x∈Ex\in E, one has p(x)∈p(x)\in Im(p∗p^*), and consequently ⟨p(x)∣x⟩=⟨p∗(p(x))∣x⟩=∥p(x)∥2⩾0\langle p(x)|x\rangle =\langle p^*(p(x))|x\rangle =\|p(x)\|^2\geqslant 0.

(vi) =⇒=\Rightarrow (vii) : let x∈Ex\in E and y=x−p(x)∈y=x-p(x)\in Ker(pp). For all t∈Rt\in \mathbf{R}, one has by hypothesis

⟨x+ty∣p(x)⟩=⟨x+ty∣p(x+ty)⟩⩾0 \langle x+ty|p(x)\rangle =\langle x+ty|p(x+ty)\rangle \geqslant 0

which is possible only if ⟨y∣p(x)⟩=0\langle y|p(x)\rangle = 0. But then

∥p(x)∥2=⟨x∣p(x)⟩⩽∥x∥∥p(x)∥ \|p(x)\|^2=\langle x|p(x)\rangle \leqslant \|x\|\|p(x)\|

and therefore ∥p∥⩽1\|p\|\leqslant 1.

(vii) =⇒=\Rightarrow (i) : let y∈y\in Im(pp) ; denote by zz the orthogonal projection of yy onto Ker(pp)∘^{\circ} and put x=y−z∈x=y-z\in Ker(pp). One has p(z)=p(y)=yp(z) =p(y) =y, hence ∥y∥⩽∥z∥\|y\|\leqslant \|z\| by hypothesis. But, since xx and zz are orthogonal, one has ∥y∥2=∥x∥2+∥z∥2\|y\|^2=\|x\|^2+\|z\|^2, whence ∥x∥=0\|x\|= 0, that is to say y=zy=z. Thus, Im(pp)⊂\subset Ker(pp)∘^{\circ}. Since moreover ∥p∗∥=∥p∥⩽1\|p^*\|=\|p\|\leqslant 1, one has analogously Im(p∗p^*)⊂\subset Ker(p∗p^*)∘^{\circ}, which yields the converse inclusion by (1).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.