Lemma 3
Tag 02G8, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02G8].
Théories spectrales, chapter I, § 7. Spectre des endomorphismes des espaces de Banach
Let E be a Hilbert space and a projector. The following assertions are equivalent:
(i) The projector is an orthogonal projector, that is to say Ker() Im() (EVT, V, p. 13);
(ii) The projector is hermitian;
(iii) The projector is normal;
(iv) One has Ker() Ker() ;
(v) One has Im() Im() ;
(vi) The projector is positive;
(vii) One has .
Let us first recall that Ker() Im() and Ker() Im() (EVT, V, p. 41, prop. 4). Moreover, the image of (resp. ) is closed, since it coincides with the kernel of (resp. ). Therefore one has
(1) Im() Ker(), Im() Ker().
(i) (ii) is a projector with kernel Im() Ker() and whose image is Im() Ker() Im(); hence .
(ii) (iii) since every hermitian endomorphism is normal.
(iii) (iv) : since is normal, one has for all in E (EVT, V, p. 43, Prop. 7), whence the required inclusion.
(iv) (v) follows from equalities (1) above.
(v) (vi) : for all , one has Im(), and consequently .
(vi) (vii) : let and Ker(). For all , one has by hypothesis
which is possible only if . But then
and therefore .
(vii) (i) : let Im() ; denote by the orthogonal projection of onto Ker() and put Ker(). One has , hence by hypothesis. But, since and are orthogonal, one has , whence , that is to say . Thus, Im() Ker(). Since moreover , one has analogously Im() Ker(), which yields the converse inclusion by (1).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.