Bourbaki

Exercise 51, § 1

Tag 02LR, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02LR].

Spectral Theories, II, p. 288

We identify T\mathbf{T} with the interval [0,1[[0,1[. For n∈Zn\in \mathbf{Z}, let ene_n be the unitary character of T\mathbf{T} defined by t↦t\mapsto exp(2iπnti\pi nt). For every measure μ∈M1(T)\mu\in \mathscr{M}^1(\mathbf{T}) and every integer m⩾1m\geqslant 1, one sets

Sm(μ)=∑h=−mmμ^(h)eh∈C(T) S_m(\mu) =\sum_{h=-m}^m\widehat{\mu}(h)e_h\in \mathscr{C}(\mathbf{T})

for the mm-th symmetric partial sum of the Fourier series of μ\mu.

A finite family (y1,...,yk)(y_1, . . . , y_k) of real numbers is said to be T\mathbf{T}-independent if (1,y1,...,yk)(1, y_1, . . . , y_k) is linearly independent over Q\mathbf{Q}. This amounts to saying that the equation

∑j=1kmjyj=0 \sum_{j=1}^km_jy_j= 0

in T\mathbf{T}, with mj∈Zm_j\in \mathbf{Z}, has for unique solution the zero family. For t∈Rt\in \mathbf{R}, one denotes by t−(y1,...,yk)t-(y_1, . . . , y_k) the family (t−yj)j(t-y_j)_j.

a) Let n⩾106n\geqslant 10^6 be an integer. There exist real numbers x1,...,xnx_1, . . . ,x_n in [0,1][0,1] such that

∣xj−j/n∣⩽10−4n−1 |x_j-j/n|\leqslant 10^{-4}n^{-1}

and such that the family En=(x1,...,xn)E_n= (x_1, . . . , x_n) is T\mathbf{T}-independent.

One sets

nn

μn=1n∑εxj\mu_n=\frac{1}{n}\sum\varepsilon_{x_j}.

j=1j=1

It is a probability measure on T\mathbf{T}.

b) Let t∈Rt\in \mathbf{R}. One has

1n∑j=1n∣\frac{1}{n}\sum_{j=1}^n| sin(π(1t−xj)\pi (1t-x_j))∣⩾15|\geqslant \frac{1}{5} log nn.

c) Let t∈Rt\in \mathbf{R} be such that the family t−Ent-E_n is T\mathbf{T}-independent. There exists m∈N∗m\in \mathbf{N}^* such that

∣Sm(μn)(t)∣⩾215|S_m(\mu_n)(t)|\geqslant \frac{2}{15} log nn.

(apply the theorem of Kronecker, cf. exercise 34).

d) Let t∈Rt\in \mathbf{R} be such that the family t−Ent-E_n is not T\mathbf{T}-independent and let m1,...,mnm_1, . . . ,m_n be integers, not all zero, such that

∑j=1nmj(t−xj)=0 \sum_{j=1}^nm_j(t-x_j) = 0

in T\mathbf{T}. If two of the integers mjm_j are nonzero, there exists m⩾0m\geqslant 0 such that

∣Sm(μn)(t)∣⩾110|S_m(\mu_n)(t)|\geqslant \frac{1}{10} log nn (let jj be such that mj≠0m_j\not= 0 and ∣xj−t∣|x_j-t| is maximal; note that the family t−(xi)i≠jt-(x_i)_{i\not=j} is T\mathbf{T}-independent and apply the theorem of Kronecker).

e) We retain the assumption of the preceding question, but we suppose that only one of the coefficients mjm_j is nonzero, and that t∉Ent \notin E_n. There exists m⩾0m\geqslant 0 such that

∣Sm(μn)(t)∣⩾110|S_m(\mu_n)(t)|\geqslant \frac{1}{10} log nn

(observe that the family mj(t−xi)i≠jm_j(t-x_i)_{i\not=j} is T\mathbf{T}-independent and apply Kronecker's theorem).

f) We suppose that t∈Ent\in E_n. There exists m⩾0m\geqslant 0 such that

∣Sm(μn)(t)∣⩾110|S_m(\mu_n)(t)|\geqslant \frac{1}{10} log nn

(the family (xi)xi≠t(x_i)_{x_i\not=t} is T\mathbf{T}-independent).

g) There exists an integer M⩾0M\geqslant 0 such that, for all t∈Tt\in \mathbf{T}, one has

sup0⩽m⩽M∣Sm(μn)(t)∣⩾120_{0\leqslant m\leqslant M}|S_m(\mu_n)(t)|\geqslant \frac{1}{20} log nn.

h) There exists a function fn∈C∞(T)f_n\in \mathscr{C}^{\infty}(\mathbf{T}) and an integer M⩾0M\geqslant 0 such that

Supp(fnf_n)⊂⋃j=1n[jn−2104n,jn+2104n]\subset \bigcup_{j=1}^n[\frac{j}{n}-\frac{2}{10^4n},\frac{j}{n}+\frac{2}{10^4n}]

∫jn−2104njn+2104nfn=1n,1⩽j⩽n \int_{\frac{j}{n}-\frac{2}{10^4n}}^{\frac{j}{n}+\frac{2}{10^4n}}f_n=\frac{1}{n},1\leqslant j\leqslant n

sup0⩽m⩽M∣Sm(fn)(t)∣⩾140_{0\leqslant m\leqslant M}|S_m(f_n)(t)|\geqslant \frac{1}{40} log nn, for all t∈Tt\in \mathbf{T}.

i) There exists M⩾1M\geqslant 1 and a finite family (an)∣n∣⩽M(a_n)_{|n|\leqslant M} of complex numbers such that the function

gM(t)=∑k=−MMakekn g_M(t) =\sum_{k=-M}^Ma_ke_kn

satisfies

∫T∣gM(t)∣dt⩽2\int_{\mathbf{T}}|g_M(t)|dt\leqslant 2, inft∈T0_{t\in\mathbf{T}0}sup⩽m⩽M∣Sm(gM)(t)∣⩾140_{\leqslant m\leqslant M}|S_m(g_M)(t)|\geqslant \frac{1}{40} log nn.

j) There exists φ∈L1(T)\varphi \in L^1(\mathbf{T}) such that φ^(h)=0\widehat{\varphi}(h) = 0 if h<0h <0 and such that the series

∑h⩾1φ^(h)eh(t) \sum_{h\geqslant 1}\widehat{\varphi}(h)e_h(t)

diverges for all t∈Tt\in \mathbf{T} ("Kolmogorov's theorem").

(There exists a sequence NkN_k of integers and a sequence of functions

gk=∑n=−NkNkak,nen g_k=\sum_{n=-N_k}^{N_k}a_{k,n}e_n

such that ∥gk∥1⩽2\|g_k\|_1\leqslant 2 and

inft∈T0_{t\in\mathbf{T}0}sup⩽m⩽Nk∣Sm(gk)(t)∣⩾22k_{\leqslant m\leqslant N_k}|S_m(g_k)(t)|\geqslant 2^{2k}.

Let g~k=eMkgk\widetilde{g}_k=e_{M_k}g_k, where MkM_k is a sufficiently large integer; put φ=∑k⩾12−kg~k.)\varphi =\sum_{k\geqslant 1}2^{-k}\widetilde{g}_k.)

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4. Not checked by a person.