Bourbaki

Proposition 2

Tag 02N5, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02N5].

Théories spectrales, chapter II, § 3. Sous-espaces invariants

Let I be a closed ideal of L1(G)L^1(G), and let f∈L1(G)f\in L^1(G). If F‾G(f)\overline{\mathscr{F}}_G(f) vanishes on a neighbourhood of V(I), then ff belongs to I.

Let ε>0\varepsilon >0. There exists a function g∈L1(G)g\in L^1(G) such that ∥f−f∗g∥1<\|f-f*g\|_1< ε\varepsilon (prop. 8 of II, p. 211 (iv)). Let h∈L1(G)h\in L^1(G) be such that the support of F‾G(h)\overline{\mathscr{F}}_G(h) is compact and ∥f∥1∥g−h∥1<ε\|f\|_1\|g-h\|_1< \varepsilon (lemma 1). We have

∥f−f∗h∥1⩽∥f−f∗g∥1+∥f∗(g−h)∥1<2ε \|f-f*h\|_1\leqslant \|f-f*g\|_1+\|f*(g-h)\|_1<2\varepsilon

By the assumption on ff, the function F‾G(f∗h)=F‾G(f)F‾G(h)\overline{\mathscr{F}}_G(f*h) =\overline{\mathscr{F}}_G(f)\overline{\mathscr{F}}_G(h) has compact support disjoint from V(I), which implies that f∗h∈If*h\in I (remark 2 above). Since ε\varepsilon is arbitrarily small, we have f∈f\in I = I.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.