Let I be a closed ideal of L1(G), and let f∈L1(G). If FG(f) vanishes on a neighbourhood of V(I), then f belongs to I.
Let ε>0. There exists a function g∈L1(G) such that ∥f−f∗g∥1<ε (prop. 8 of II, p. 211 (iv)). Let h∈L1(G) be such that the support of FG(h) is compact and ∥f∥1∥g−h∥1<ε (lemma 1). We have
∥f−f∗h∥1⩽∥f−f∗g∥1+∥f∗(g−h)∥1<2ε
By the assumption on f, the function FG(f∗h)=FG(f)FG(h) has compact support disjoint from V(I), which implies that f∗h∈I (remark 2 above). Since ε is arbitrarily small, we have f∈ I = I.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.