Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 02QR, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02QR].

Théories spectrales, chapter III, § 2. Exemples d’applications linéaires compactes

a) Let k∈Np,q(X×Y)k\in \mathscr{N}^{p,q}(X\times Y). For f∈Lp(X)f\in \mathscr{L}^p(X) and g∈Lq(Y)g\in \mathscr{L}^q(Y), the function

(x,y)↦k(x,y)f(x)g(y) (x, y)\mapsto k(x, y)f(x)g(y)

is (μ⊗ν)(\mu\otimes \nu )-integrable and there exists a unique mapping uku_k from Lp(X)L^p(X) into Lq′(Y)L^{q'}(Y) such that

⟨g,uk(f)⟩=∫X×Yk(x,y)f(x)g(y)d(μ⊗ν)(x,y) \langle g, u_k(f)\rangle =\int_{X\times Y}k(x, y)f(x)g(y)d(\mu\otimes \nu )(x, y)

for all f∈Lp(X)f\in L^p(X) and g∈Lq(Y)g\in L^q(Y). The mapping uku_k is linear and continuous, and its norm is ⩽∥k∥p,q\leqslant \|k\|_{p,q};

b) Let k∈Np,q(X×Y)k\in \mathscr{N}^{p,q}(X\times Y). One has uk=0u_k= 0 if and only if kk is locally (μ⊗ν)(\mu\otimes \nu )-negligible;

c) The mapping which associates uku_k with kk is a continuous linear mapping of the semi-normed space Np,q(X×Y)\mathscr{N}^{p,q}(X\times Y) into the Banach space L(Lp(X);Lq′(Y))\mathscr{L}(L^p(X); L^{q'}(Y)), such that ∥uk∥⩽∥k∥p,q\|u_k\|\leqslant \|k\|_{p,q} for every k∈Np,q(X×Y)k\in \mathscr{N}^{p,q}(X\times Y).

Let k∈Np,q(X×X)k\in \mathscr{N}^{p,q}(X\times X). By definition, the function from X×YX\times Y into C\mathbf{C} defined by (x,y)↦k(x,y)f(x)g(y)(x, y)\mapsto k(x, y)f(x)g(y) is (μ⊗ν(\mu\otimes \nu)-integrable when f∈Lp(X)f\in \mathscr{L}^p(X) and g∈Lqg\in \mathscr{L}^q(Y), and the mapping

bk:(f,g)↦∫X×Yk(x,y)f(x)g(y)d(μ⊗ν)(x,y) b_k: (f, g)\mapsto \int_{X\times Y}k(x, y)f(x)g(y)d(\mu\otimes \nu )(x, y)

is a continuous bilinear mapping from Lp(X)×Lq(Y)L^p(X)\times L^q(Y) into C\mathbf{C}. For every f∈Lpf\in L^p(X), there therefore exists a unique h∈Lq′(Y)h\in L^{q'}(Y) such that bk(f,g)=b_k(f, g) = ⟨g,h⟩\langle g, h\rangle for every g∈Lq(Y)g\in L^q(Y); let us write uk(f)=hu_k(f) =h. By (2), one has ∥uk(f)∥q′⩽∥k∥p,q∥f∥p\|u_k(f)\|_{q'}\leqslant \|k\|_{p,q}\|f\|_p; the mapping uku_k is linear and continuous, of norm ⩽∥k∥p,q\leqslant \|k\|_{p,q}. Moreover, the mapping k↦ukk\mapsto u_k is linear, and assertions a) and c) follow from this.

Let us prove b). Suppose that kk is locally (μ⊗ν(\mu\otimes \nu)-negligible. Let f∈Lp(X)f\in \mathscr{L}^p(X) and g∈Lq(Y)g\in \mathscr{L}^q(Y); the function defined on X×YX\times Y by (x,y)↦k(x,y)f(x)g(y)(x, y)\mapsto k(x, y)f(x)g(y) is (μ⊗ν(\mu\otimes \nu)-moderate. Since it is locally (μ⊗ν(\mu\otimes \nu)-negligible, it is negligible (INT, V, p. 7, § 1, No.o2^o2, Corollary 1). Thus, one has ⟨uk(f),g⟩=bk(f,g)=0\langle u_k(f), g\rangle =b_k(f, g) = 0. It follows that uk=0u_k= 0.

Conversely, let k∈Np,q(X×Y)k\in \mathscr{N}^{p,q}(X\times Y) be such that uk=0u_k= 0. The function kk is locally (μ⊗ν(\mu\otimes \nu)-integrable (Lemma 1). For all functions f∈K(X)f\in \mathscr{K}(X) and g∈Kg\in \mathscr{K} (Y), one has

⟨g,uk(f)⟩=∫X×Yf(x)g(y)k(x,y)d(μ⊗ν)(x,y) \langle g, u_k(f)\rangle =\int_{X\times Y}f(x)g(y)k(x, y)d(\mu\otimes \nu )(x, y)

therefore the measure k⋅(μ⊗ν)k\cdot (\mu\otimes \nu ) on X×YX\times Y is zero (cf. INT, III, p. 82, § 4, No.o1^o1, Theorem 1). This means that kk is locally (μ⊗ν(\mu\otimes \nu)-negligible (INT, V, p. 46, §5, No.o3^o3, Corollary 2).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-6-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.