a) Let k∈Np,q(X×Y). For f∈Lp(X) and g∈Lq(Y), the function
(x,y)↦k(x,y)f(x)g(y)
is (μ⊗ν)-integrable and there exists a unique mapping uk from Lp(X) into Lq′(Y) such that
⟨g,uk(f)⟩=∫X×Yk(x,y)f(x)g(y)d(μ⊗ν)(x,y)
for all f∈Lp(X) and g∈Lq(Y). The mapping uk is linear and continuous, and its norm is ⩽∥k∥p,q;
b) Let k∈Np,q(X×Y). One has uk=0 if and only if k is locally (μ⊗ν)-negligible;
c) The mapping which associates uk with k is a continuous linear mapping of the semi-normed space Np,q(X×Y) into the Banach space L(Lp(X);Lq′(Y)), such that ∥uk∥⩽∥k∥p,q for every k∈Np,q(X×Y).
Let k∈Np,q(X×X). By definition, the function from X×Y into C defined by (x,y)↦k(x,y)f(x)g(y) is (μ⊗ν)-integrable when f∈Lp(X) and g∈Lq(Y), and the mapping
bk:(f,g)↦∫X×Yk(x,y)f(x)g(y)d(μ⊗ν)(x,y)
is a continuous bilinear mapping from Lp(X)×Lq(Y) into C. For every f∈Lp(X), there therefore exists a unique h∈Lq′(Y) such that bk(f,g)= ⟨g,h⟩ for every g∈Lq(Y); let us write uk(f)=h. By (2), one has ∥uk(f)∥q′⩽∥k∥p,q∥f∥p; the mapping uk is linear and continuous, of norm ⩽∥k∥p,q. Moreover, the mapping k↦uk is linear, and assertions a) and c) follow from this.
Let us prove b). Suppose that k is locally (μ⊗ν)-negligible. Let f∈Lp(X) and g∈Lq(Y); the function defined on X×Y by (x,y)↦k(x,y)f(x)g(y) is (μ⊗ν)-moderate. Since it is locally (μ⊗ν)-negligible, it is negligible (INT, V, p. 7, § 1, No.o2, Corollary 1). Thus, one has ⟨uk(f),g⟩=bk(f,g)=0. It follows that uk=0.
Conversely, let k∈Np,q(X×Y) be such that uk=0. The function k is locally (μ⊗ν)-integrable (Lemma 1). For all functions f∈K(X) and g∈K (Y), one has
⟨g,uk(f)⟩=∫X×Yf(x)g(y)k(x,y)d(μ⊗ν)(x,y)
therefore the measure k⋅(μ⊗ν) on X×Y is zero (cf. INT, III, p. 82, § 4, No.o1, Theorem 1). This means that k is locally (μ⊗ν)-negligible (INT, V, p. 46, §5, No.o3, Corollary 2).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.