Bourbaki

§ 2. Examples of compact linear mappings

1. Endomorphisms of finite trace, of Hilbert–Schmidt, and of nuclear power pep^{\mathbf{e}}

*Let E and F be Hilbert spaces. Every endomorphism of E of finite trace (EVT, V, p. 49, Def. 7 and p. 50, Def. 8) is compact (IV, p. 165, Corollary 1); every Hilbert–Schmidt mapping of E into F (EVT, V, p. 51, Def. 9) is compact (IV, p. 165, Corollary 2).

For every real number p⩾1p\geqslant 1, the vector space Lp(E;F)\mathscr{L}_p(E; F) of linear mappings of E into F of nuclear power pep^e is contained in Lc(E;F)(\mathscr{L}^c(E; F) (cf. IV, p. 169, Remark 2 for p=1).∗p= 1).*

2. Diagonal operators in spaces of sequences

Let I be a nonempty set. Recall (EVT, I, p. 4 and p. 5) that the vector space of bounded families x=(xi)i∈Ix= (x_i)_{i\in I} of elements of C\mathbf{C}, endowed with the norm ∥x∥=\|x\|= supi∣xi∣_i|x_i|, is a Banach space denoted by ℓC∞(I)\ell^{\infty}_{\mathbf{C}}(I).

Let pp be an element of [1,+∞[[1,+\infty [. The space ℓCp(I)\ell^p_{\mathbf{C}}(I) of families x=(xi)i∈Ix= (x_i)_{i\in I} of elements of C\mathbf{C} such that the family (∣xi∣p)(|x_i|^p) is summable is a vector space on which the mapping x↦∥x∥=(∑i∣xi∣p)1/px\mapsto \|x\|= (\sum_i|x_i|^p)^{1/p} is a norm which makes it into a Banach space. If one endows the space I with the discrete topology and with the measure for which μ({x})=1\mu(\{x\}) = 1 for every x∈Ix\in I, this space is none other than the Banach space LCp(I,μ)L^p_{\mathbf{C}}(I, \mu). When p=1p= 1 or p=2p= 2, this notation thus coincides with that of EVT, I, p. 4 and EVT, V, p. 18 (cf. INT, IV, p. 141, §4, No.o1^o1, example).

For families x=(xi)i∈Ix= (x_i)_{i\in I} and y=(yi)i∈Iy= (y_i)_{i\in I} of complex numbers, one denotes by xyxy the family (xiyi)i∈I(x_iy_i)_{i\in I}.

Proposition 1 02QK

Let λ=(λi)i∈I\lambda = (\lambda_i)_{i\in I} be a bounded family of elements of C\mathbf{C}. Let pp be an element of [1,+∞][1,+\infty ]. Let E be the Banach space ℓCp(I)\ell^p_{\mathbf{C}}(I).

a) For every x∈Ex\in E, one has λx∈E\lambda x\in E and the mapping u:x↦λxu:x\mapsto \lambda x is a continuous endomorphism of E, whose spectrum in the Banach algebra L(E)\mathscr{L}(E) is equal to the closure in C\mathbf{C} of the set of the λi\lambda_i, and whose norm is equal to supi∣λi∣_i|\lambda_i|;

b) The endomorphism uu is compact if and only if for every real number ε>0\varepsilon >0, the set of elements i∈Ii\in I such that ∣λi∣⩾ε|\lambda_i|\geqslant \varepsilon is finite.

With the notation of the proposition, the endomorphism x↦λxx\mapsto \lambda x is called a diagonal endomorphism of ℓCp(I)\ell^p_{\mathbf{C}}(I).

Let us prove the proposition. Let C = supi∣λi∣_i|\lambda_i|. Let x∈Ex\in E. One has the inequalities

∑i∈I∣λixi∣p⩽Cp∥x∥p\sum_{i\in I}|\lambda_ix_i|^p\leqslant C^p\|x\|^p, if p≠+∞p\not = +\infty

supi∈I∣λixi∣⩽C∥x∥_{i\in I}|\lambda_ix_i|\leqslant C\|x\|, if p=+∞p= +\infty.

This proves that λx∈E\lambda x\in E. The mapping x↦λxx\mapsto \lambda x is therefore an endomorphism of E, and these inequalities prove that it is of norm ⩽C\leqslant C.

For j∈Ij\in I, denote by eje_j the element (xi)i∈I(x_i)_{i\in I} of ℓCp(I)\ell^p_{\mathbf{C}}(I) such that xj=1x_j= 1 and xi=0x_i= 0 if i≠ji\not =j. We then have u(ej)=λjeju(e_j) =\lambda_je_j for all j∈Ij\in I, which shows that λj\lambda_j belongs to the spectrum of uu. Since the spectrum of uu is closed, the closure in C\mathbf{C} of the set of the λi\lambda_i is contained in the spectrum of uu. Since the spectrum of uu is contained in the disk centered at 0 and of radius ∥u∥(\|u\|(I, p. 24, Theorem 1 and formula (3) of I, p. 21), we deduce the inequality C⩽∥u∥C\leqslant \|u\|, whence ∥u∥=C\|u\|= C.

Conversely, if λ∈C\lambda \in \mathbf{C} is not adherent to the set of the λi\lambda_i, then the family ((λi−λ)−1)i∈I((\lambda_i-\lambda )^{-1})_{i\in I} is bounded. What precedes therefore shows that the linear mapping x↦((λ−λi)−1xi)i∈Ix\mapsto ((\lambda -\lambda_i)^{-1}x_i)_{i\in I} is an endomorphism of E. It is inverse to u−λ1Eu-\lambda 1_E, and hence λ\lambda does not belong to the spectrum of uu. This proves a).

Let us now prove b). Suppose that the endomorphism uu is compact. Let ε>0\varepsilon >0. Denote by J the set of the i∈Ii\in I such that ∣λi∣⩾ε|\lambda_i|\geqslant \varepsilon. The set of elements eie_i for i∈Ji\in J is bounded in E. Its image by uu, formed by the elements λiei\lambda_ie_i for i∈Ji\in J, is therefore relatively compact in E (Remark 1 of III, p. 2). Since ∥λiei−λjej∥⩾ε\|\lambda_ie_i-\lambda_je_j\|\geqslant \varepsilon for every pair of elements i≠ji\not =j in J, this is possible only if the set J is finite.

Let us prove the converse assertion. Let J be a finite subset of I and denote by zJ=(zJ,i)i∈Iz_J= (z_{J,i})_{i\in I}, where zJ,i=λiz_{J,i}=\lambda_i for i∈Ji\in J and zJ,i=0z_{J,i}= 0 for i∈Ii\in I- J ; the family zJz_J defines an endomorphism of finite rank uJ:x↦zJxu_J:x\mapsto z_Jx of E. According to what precedes, the norm of the linear mapping u−uJu-u_J is bounded above by the upper bound in R+\mathbf{R}_+ of the family (∣λi∣)i∈I−J(|\lambda_i|)_{i\in I-J}. The assumption implies that for every ε>0\varepsilon >0, there exists a finite subset J⊂IJ\subset I such that this upper bound is ⩽ε\leqslant \varepsilon. It follows that the mapping uu is adherent to Lf\mathscr{L}^f(E), and hence that it is compact (III, p. 4, cor. of Prop. 2).

Remark 1 02QL

The assumption of assertion b) is always valid if I is finite. When the set I is infinite, it means that the family (λi)i∈I(\lambda_i)_{i\in I} tends to 0 according to the filter of complements of finite subsets of I; in particular, the set of the i∈Ii\in I such that λi≠0\lambda_i\not = 0 is then countable.

Remark 2 02QM

It will be seen later (cf. IV, p. 149, theorem 1) that when p=2p= 2, every normal compact endomorphism of the Hilbert space ℓC2(I)\ell^2_{\mathbf{C}}(I) is of the form u=w∘v∘w−1u=w\circ v\circ w^{-1}, where vv is a diagonal compact endomorphism and ww is a unitary endomorphism (EVT, V, p. 40) of the Hilbert space ℓC2(I).∗\ell^2_{\mathbf{C}}(I).*

3. Linear mappings with values in a space of continuous functions defined by a kernel

We take here K=CK =\mathbf{C}. Let X and Y be locally compact topological spaces. Let μ\mu be a complex measure on X and kk a mapping of X×YX\times Y into C\mathbf{C} having the following two properties:

(i) For every y∈Yy\in Y, the function ky:x↦k(x,y)k_y:x\mapsto k(x, y) of X into C\mathbf{C} is μ\mu-integrable;

(ii) The mapping y↦kyy\mapsto k_y of Y into LC1(X,μ)\mathscr{L}_{\mathbf{C}}^1(X, \mu) is continuous.

Endow the space C(Y)\mathscr{C}(Y) of continuous functions on Y with complex values with the topology of compact convergence. For ff in LC∞(X,μ)\mathscr{L}_{\mathbf{C}}^{\infty}(X, \mu), define k~(f):Y→C\widetilde{k}(f) : Y\rightarrow \mathbf{C} by

k~(f)(y)=∫Xk(x,y)f(x)dμ(x)=∫Xkyfdμ(1) \widetilde{k}(f)(y) =\int_Xk(x, y)f(x)d\mu(x) =\int_Xk_yf d\mu \tag{1}

The mapping h↦∫Xhfdμh\mapsto \int_Xhf d\mu is a continuous linear form on LC1(X,μ)\mathscr{L}_{\mathbf{C}}^1(X, \mu), so condition (ii) shows that the function k~(f)\widetilde{k}(f) is continuous.

Proposition 2 02QN

The mapping k~\widetilde{k} of LC∞(X,μ)\mathscr{L}_{\mathbf{C}}^{\infty}(X, \mu) into C(Y)\mathscr{C}(Y) is compact.

For every yy and y′y' in Y, one has

∣k~(f)(y)∣⩽∥ky∥1∥f∥∞,∣k~(f)(y)−k~(f)(y′)∣⩽∥ky−ky′∥1∥f∥∞ |\widetilde{k}(f)(y)|\leqslant \|k_y\|_1\|f\|_{\infty},|\widetilde{k}(f)(y)-\widetilde{k}(f)(y')|\leqslant \|k_y-k_{y'}\|_1\|f\|_{\infty}

By Ascoli's theorem (TG, X, p. 18, cor. 2), it follows that the image under k~\widetilde{k} of the unit ball of LC∞(X;μ)\mathscr{L}_{\mathbf{C}}^{\infty}(X;\mu) is relatively compact in C(Y)\mathscr{C}(Y).

Corollary 02QO

Let X be a compact topological space, Y a locally compact topological space, μ\mu a complex measure on X, and kk a continuous mapping of X×YX\times Y into C\mathbf{C}. Then formula (1) defines a compact linear mapping, again denoted by k~\widetilde{k}, of C(X)\mathscr{C}(X) endowed with the topology of uniform convergence into C(Y)\mathscr{C}(Y) endowed with the topology of compact convergence.

Let us verify conditions (i) and (ii) for kk. For every y∈Yy\in Y, the mapping kyk_y is continuous on the compact space X, hence μ\mu-integrable. Moreover, the mapping y↦kyy\mapsto k_y is continuous from Y into C(X)\mathscr{C}(X) since X is compact (TG, X, p. 28, th. 3). Since ∥ky−ky′∥1⩽∥μ∥∥ky−ky′∥\|k_y-k_{y'}\|_1\leqslant \|\mu\| \|k_y-k_{y'}\| for every (y,y′)∈Y2(y, y')\in Y^2, this mapping of Y into LC1(X,μ)\mathscr{L}_{\mathbf{C}}^1(X, \mu) is continuous. By prop. 2, the mapping k~\widetilde{k} of LC∞(X,μ)\mathscr{L}_{\mathbf{C}}^{\infty}(X, \mu) into C(Y)\mathscr{C}(Y) is compact. By composition with the canonical mapping C(X)→LC∞(X,μ)\mathscr{C}(X)\rightarrow \mathscr{L}_{\mathbf{C}}^{\infty}(X, \mu), one obtains a compact linear mapping of C(X)\mathscr{C}(X) into C(Y)\mathscr{C}(Y).

4. Linear mappings between Lebesgue spaces defined by a kernel

Here we take K=CK =\mathbf{C}. Let X be a locally compact topological space endowed with a positive measure μ\mu. For every r∈[1,+∞]r\in [1,+\infty ], we write Lr(X)=LCr(X,μ)\mathscr{L}^r(X) =\mathscr{L}_{\mathbf{C}}^r(X, \mu) and Lr(X)=LCr(X,μ)L^r(X) = L^r_{\mathbf{C}}(X, \mu). When r∈[1,+∞[r\in [1,+\infty [, we identify the dual of Lr(X)L^r(X) with Lr′(X)L^{r'}(X), where r′r' is the conjugate exponent of rr, such that 1/r+1/r′=11/r+ 1/r'= 1 (INT, V, p. 61, § 5, no8^o8, th. 4). We write ∥f∥r\|f\|_r for the norm (or semi-norm) of f∈Lr(X)f\in L^r(X) (or f∈Lr(X)f\in \mathscr{L}^r(X)).

We recall that a subset A of X is said to be μ\mu-moderate (INT, V, p. 4, § 1, no2^o2) if it is contained in the union of a sequence of μ\mu-integrable sets, and that a function ff defined on X with values in a vector space or in R‾\overline{\mathbf{R}} is μ\mu-moderate if it is zero in the complement of a μ\mu-moderate subset of X. If 1 ⩽p<+∞\leqslant p <+\infty and f∈Lpf\in \mathscr{L}^p(X), then ff is moderate (INT, V, p. 9, § 1, no3^o3, cor.). If ff is μ\mu-moderate, then fgf g is μ\mu-moderate for every function gg.

Let pp and qq be elements of]1,+∞[]1,+\infty [. Let X and Y be locally compact topological spaces, endowed with positive measures μ\mu and ν\nu, respectively. We endow the space X×YX\times Y (resp. Y×XY\times X) with the product measure μ⊗ν\mu\otimes \nu (resp. ν⊗μ\nu \otimes \mu).

We write Np,q(X×Y,μ⊗ν)\mathscr{N}^{p,q}(X\times Y, \mu\otimes \nu ), or simply Np,q(X×Y)\mathscr{N}^{p,q}(X\times Y), for the set of (μ⊗ν(\mu\otimes \nu)-measurable mappings kk from X×YX\times Y into C\mathbf{C} such that there exists a real number C⩾0C\geqslant 0 satisfying

∫X×Y∗∣k(x,y)f(x)g(y)∣d(μ⊗ν)(x,y)⩽C∥f∥p∥g∥q(2) \int_{X\times Y}^*|k(x, y)f(x)g(y)|d(\mu\otimes \nu )(x, y)\leqslant C\|f\|_p\|g\|_q \tag{2}

for all functions f∈Lp(X)f\in \mathscr{L}^p(X) and g∈Lq(Y)g\in \mathscr{L}^q(Y). We then write ∥k∥p,q\|k\|_{p,q} for the greatest lower bound of the set of real numbers C having this property.

Remark 02QP

Let f∈Lp(X)f\in \mathscr{L}^p(X) and g∈Lq(Y)g\in \mathscr{L}^q(Y). Since p<+∞p <+\infty and q<+∞q <+\infty, the functions ff and gg are moderate, and the function defined by (x,y)↦f(x)g(y)(x, y)\mapsto f(x)g(y) is (μ⊗ν(\mu\otimes \nu)-moderate (cf. INT, V, p. 92, § 8, no3^o3, Corollary 2). Consequently, the function (x,y)↦k(x,y)f(x)g(y)(x, y)\mapsto k(x, y)f(x)g(y) is (μ⊗ν(\mu\otimes \nu)-moderate, and in particular the upper integral of its absolute value coincides with the essential upper integral (INT, V, p. 6, § 1, no3^o3, Proposition 7).

The set Np,q(X×Y)\mathscr{N}^{p,q}(X\times Y) is a vector subspace of the space of functions from X×YX\times Y into C\mathbf{C} and the mapping defined by k↦∥k∥p,qk\mapsto \|k\|_{p,q} is a semi-norm on Np,q(X×Y)\mathscr{N}^{p,q}(X\times Y).

Lemma 1 02QQ

Let k∈Np,q(X×Y)k\in \mathscr{N}^{p,q}(X\times Y). The function kk is locally (μ⊗ν)(\mu\otimes \nu )-integrable.

The mapping kk is (μ⊗ν(\mu\otimes \nu)-measurable by hypothesis. Let A be a compact subset of X×YX\times Y. There exist compact subsets B⊂XB\subset X and C⊂YC\subset Y such that A⊂B×CA\subset B\times C. Applying (2) to the characteristic functions φB\varphi_B of B and φC\varphi_C of C, one obtains

∫X×Y∗∣k(x,y)∣φA(x,y)d(μ⊗ν)(x,y) \int_{X\times Y}^*|k(x, y)|\varphi_A(x, y)d(\mu\otimes \nu )(x, y)
⩽∫X×Y∗∣k(x,y)∣φB(x)φC(y)d(μ⊗ν)(x,y)<+∞ \leqslant \int_{X\times Y}^*|k(x, y)|\varphi_B(x)\varphi_C(y)d(\mu\otimes \nu )(x, y)<+\infty

whence the result (INT, V, p. 41, §5, no1^o1, Proposition 1 and Definition 1).

Proposition 3 02QR

a) Let k∈Np,q(X×Y)k\in \mathscr{N}^{p,q}(X\times Y). For f∈Lp(X)f\in \mathscr{L}^p(X) and g∈Lq(Y)g\in \mathscr{L}^q(Y), the function

(x,y)↦k(x,y)f(x)g(y) (x, y)\mapsto k(x, y)f(x)g(y)

is (μ⊗ν)(\mu\otimes \nu )-integrable and there exists a unique mapping uku_k from Lp(X)L^p(X) into Lq′(Y)L^{q'}(Y) such that

⟨g,uk(f)⟩=∫X×Yk(x,y)f(x)g(y)d(μ⊗ν)(x,y) \langle g, u_k(f)\rangle =\int_{X\times Y}k(x, y)f(x)g(y)d(\mu\otimes \nu )(x, y)

for all f∈Lp(X)f\in L^p(X) and g∈Lq(Y)g\in L^q(Y). The mapping uku_k is linear and continuous, and its norm is ⩽∥k∥p,q\leqslant \|k\|_{p,q};

b) Let k∈Np,q(X×Y)k\in \mathscr{N}^{p,q}(X\times Y). One has uk=0u_k= 0 if and only if kk is locally (μ⊗ν)(\mu\otimes \nu )-negligible;

c) The mapping which associates uku_k with kk is a continuous linear mapping of the semi-normed space Np,q(X×Y)\mathscr{N}^{p,q}(X\times Y) into the Banach space L(Lp(X);Lq′(Y))\mathscr{L}(L^p(X); L^{q'}(Y)), such that ∥uk∥⩽∥k∥p,q\|u_k\|\leqslant \|k\|_{p,q} for every k∈Np,q(X×Y)k\in \mathscr{N}^{p,q}(X\times Y).

Let k∈Np,q(X×X)k\in \mathscr{N}^{p,q}(X\times X). By definition, the function from X×YX\times Y into C\mathbf{C} defined by (x,y)↦k(x,y)f(x)g(y)(x, y)\mapsto k(x, y)f(x)g(y) is (μ⊗ν(\mu\otimes \nu)-integrable when f∈Lp(X)f\in \mathscr{L}^p(X) and g∈Lqg\in \mathscr{L}^q(Y), and the mapping

bk:(f,g)↦∫X×Yk(x,y)f(x)g(y)d(μ⊗ν)(x,y) b_k: (f, g)\mapsto \int_{X\times Y}k(x, y)f(x)g(y)d(\mu\otimes \nu )(x, y)

is a continuous bilinear mapping from Lp(X)×Lq(Y)L^p(X)\times L^q(Y) into C\mathbf{C}. For every f∈Lpf\in L^p(X), there therefore exists a unique h∈Lq′(Y)h\in L^{q'}(Y) such that bk(f,g)=b_k(f, g) = ⟨g,h⟩\langle g, h\rangle for every g∈Lq(Y)g\in L^q(Y); let us write uk(f)=hu_k(f) =h. By (2), one has ∥uk(f)∥q′⩽∥k∥p,q∥f∥p\|u_k(f)\|_{q'}\leqslant \|k\|_{p,q}\|f\|_p; the mapping uku_k is linear and continuous, of norm ⩽∥k∥p,q\leqslant \|k\|_{p,q}. Moreover, the mapping k↦ukk\mapsto u_k is linear, and assertions a) and c) follow from this.

Let us prove b). Suppose that kk is locally (μ⊗ν(\mu\otimes \nu)-negligible. Let f∈Lp(X)f\in \mathscr{L}^p(X) and g∈Lq(Y)g\in \mathscr{L}^q(Y); the function defined on X×YX\times Y by (x,y)↦k(x,y)f(x)g(y)(x, y)\mapsto k(x, y)f(x)g(y) is (μ⊗ν(\mu\otimes \nu)-moderate. Since it is locally (μ⊗ν(\mu\otimes \nu)-negligible, it is negligible (INT, V, p. 7, § 1, No.o2^o2, Corollary 1). Thus, one has ⟨uk(f),g⟩=bk(f,g)=0\langle u_k(f), g\rangle =b_k(f, g) = 0. It follows that uk=0u_k= 0.

Conversely, let k∈Np,q(X×Y)k\in \mathscr{N}^{p,q}(X\times Y) be such that uk=0u_k= 0. The function kk is locally (μ⊗ν(\mu\otimes \nu)-integrable (Lemma 1). For all functions f∈K(X)f\in \mathscr{K}(X) and g∈Kg\in \mathscr{K} (Y), one has

⟨g,uk(f)⟩=∫X×Yf(x)g(y)k(x,y)d(μ⊗ν)(x,y) \langle g, u_k(f)\rangle =\int_{X\times Y}f(x)g(y)k(x, y)d(\mu\otimes \nu )(x, y)

therefore the measure k⋅(μ⊗ν)k\cdot (\mu\otimes \nu ) on X×YX\times Y is zero (cf. INT, III, p. 82, § 4, No.o1^o1, Theorem 1). This means that kk is locally (μ⊗ν(\mu\otimes \nu)-negligible (INT, V, p. 46, §5, No.o3^o3, Corollary 2).

Definition 1 02QS

Let k∈Np,q(X×Y)k\in \mathscr{N}^{p,q}(X\times Y). One says that the mapping uku_k is the integral operator with kernel kk from Lp(X)L^p(X) into Lq′(Y)L^{q'}(Y).

For k∈Np,q(X×Y)k\in \mathscr{N}^{p,q}(X\times Y) and f∈Lpf\in \mathscr{L}^p(X), one will sometimes also denote by uk(f)u_k(f) the image under uku_k of the class of ff in Lp(X)L^p(X).

Proposition 4 02QT

Let k∈Np,q(X×Y)k\in \mathscr{N}^{p,q}(X\times Y) and f∈Lp(X)f\in \mathscr{L}^p(X). The mapping defined on X by x↦k(x,y)f(x)x\mapsto k(x, y)f(x) is μ\mu-integrable for every yy outside a locally ν\nu-negligible set, and uk(f)u_k(f) coincides with the class of the function

y↦∫Xk(x,y)f(x)dμ(x) y\mapsto \int_Xk(x, y)f(x)d\mu(x)

defined locally ν\nu-almost everywhere.

Let Y′Y' denote the set of y∈Yy\in Y such that the mapping x↦k(x,y)f(x)x\mapsto k(x, y)f(x) is not μ\mu-integrable. Let y∈Yy\in Y and let C be a compact neighbourhood of yy, whose characteristic function is denoted by φ\varphi. By condition (2) applied to ff and φ\varphi, the function (x,y)↦k(x,y)f(x)φ(y)(x, y)\mapsto k(x, y)f(x)\varphi (y) is integrable on X×YX\times Y with respect to the measure μ⊗ν\mu\otimes \nu. By the Lebesgue-Fubini theorem (INT, V, p. 96, § 8, No.o4^o4, Theorem 1, a)), the function x↦k(x,y)f(x)φ(y)x\mapsto k(x, y)f(x)\varphi (y) is μ\mu-integrable for yy outside a ν\nu-negligible set YCY_C. Since Y′∩C⊂YCY'\cap C\subset Y_C, it follows that Y′Y' is locally ν\nu-negligible in Y (INT, IV, p. 172, § 5, No.o2^o2, Definition 3).

Let hh denote the mapping defined locally ν\nu-almost everywhere on Y by y↦∫k(x,y)f(x)dμy\mapsto \int k(x, y)f(x)d\mu. It is locally ν\nu-integrable (INT, V, loc. cit.). Let g∈K(Y)g\in \mathscr{K}(Y). We have

⟨g,uk(f)⟩=∫X×Yk(x,y)f(x)g(y)d(μ⊗ν)(x,y) \langle g, u_k(f)\rangle =\int_{X\times Y}k(x, y)f(x)g(y)d(\mu\otimes \nu )(x, y)
=∫Y∫Xk(x,y)f(x)g(y)dμ(x)dν(y) =\int_Y\int_Xk(x, y)f(x)g(y)d\mu(x)d\nu (y)
=∫Yg(y)h(y)dν(y) =\int_Yg(y)h(y)d\nu (y)

(INT, V, loc. cit.). Hence uk(f)=hu_k(f) =h locally ν\nu-almost everywhere (cf. INT, V, p. 46, § 5, No.o3^o3, Corollary 2).

Proposition 5 02QU

The space Lp′(X×Y)\mathscr{L}^{p'}(X\times Y) is contained in Np,p(X×Y)\mathscr{N}^{p,p}(X\times Y). The linear mapping from Lp′(X×Y)\mathscr{L}^{p'}(X\times Y) into L(Lp(X);Lp′(Y))\mathscr{L}(L^p(X); L^{p'}(Y)) defined by k↦ukk\mapsto u_k induces, after passing to the quotient, a continuous injective linear mapping from Lp′(X×Y)L^{p'}(X\times Y) into L(Lp(X);Lp′(Y))\mathscr{L}(L^p(X); L^{p'}(Y)).

Let k∈Lp′(X×Y)k\in \mathscr{L}^{p'}(X\times Y). The mapping kk is measurable (INT, IV, p. 84, § 5, No.o6^o6, Theorem 5). Let f∈Lp(X)f\in \mathscr{L}^p(X) and g∈Lp(Y)g\in \mathscr{L}^p(Y). The function h:(x,y)↦f(x)g(y)h: (x, y)\mapsto f(x)g(y) belong to Lp(X×Y)\mathscr{L}^p(X\times Y) and ∥h∥p=∥f∥p∥g∥p\|h\|_p=\|f\|_p\|g\|_p (INT, V, p. 95, § 8, No.o3^o3, Corollary 2). The function hkhk is therefore integrable on X×YX\times Y and we have

(μ⊗ν)∗(∣hk∣)⩽∥k∥p′∥h∥p=∥k∥p′∥f∥p∥g∥p (\mu\otimes \nu )^*(|hk|)\leqslant \|k\|_{p'}\|h\|_p=\|k\|_{p'}\|f\|_p\|g\|_p

by Hölder's inequality (INT, IV, p. 208, § 6, No.o4^o4, Theorem 2), which proves that k∈Np,p(X×Y)k\in \mathscr{N}^{p,p}(X\times Y) with ∥k∥p,p⩽∥k∥p′\|k\|_{p,p}\leqslant \|k\|_{p'}.

Since p′≠+∞p'\not = +\infty, every function k∈Lp′(X×Y)k\in \mathscr{L}^{p'}(X\times Y) is moderate (INT, V, p. 9, § 1, No.o3^o3, Corollary), and the last assertion then results from Proposition 3, b) and c).

For every function k:X×Y→Ck: X\times Y\rightarrow \mathbf{C} and every y∈Yy\in Y, we denote by kyk_y the mapping of X into C\mathbf{C} defined by ky(x)=k(x,y)k_y(x) =k(x, y), and we denote by k∘k_{\circ} the mapping of Y into F(X;C)\mathscr{F}(X;\mathbf{C}) defined by y↦kyy\mapsto k_y. Analogously, we shall denote by the same symbol the mapping of Y into the space of functions defined μ\mu-almost everywhere on X which associates to yy the class of kyk_y.

For every function kk of X×YX\times Y into C\mathbf{C}, we put

Np′,q′(k)=(∫Y∙Np′(ky)q′dν(y))1/q′. N_{p',q'}(k)=\left(\int_Y^\bullet N_{p'}(k_y)^{q'}d\nu(y)\right)^{1/q'}.

It is an element of [0,+∞][0,+\infty ].

Lemma 2 02QV

For every k∈Lp′(X×Y)k\in \mathscr{L}^{p'}(X\times Y), one has Np′,p′(k)=∥k∥p′N_{p', p'}(k) =\|k\|_{p'}.

Let k∈Lp′(X×Y)k\in \mathscr{L}^{p'}(X\times Y). By INT, V, p. 96, § 8, No.o4^o4, Theorem 1, a), the set Y′Y' of elements y∈Yy\in Y such that the function ∣ky∣p′|k_y|^{p'} is not μ\mu-integrable is ν\nu-negligible; moreover, the function defined by y↦μ(∣ky∣p′)y\mapsto \mu(|k_y|^{p'}) on Y - Y′Y' and zero on Y′Y' is ν\nu-integrable and satisfies

∥k∥p′p′=∫X×Y∣k(x,y)∣p′d(μ⊗ν)(x,y)=∫Yμ(∣ky∣p′)dν=Np′,p′(k)p′ \|k\|^{p'}_{p'}=\int_{X\times Y}|k(x, y)|^{p'}d(\mu\otimes \nu )(x, y) =\int_Y\mu(|k_y|^{p'})d\nu = N_{p', p'}(k)^{p'}

We denote by Lp′,q′(X,Y,μ,ν)\mathscr{L}^{p',q'}(X,Y, \mu, \nu ), or simply by Lp′,q′(X,Y)\mathscr{L}^{p',q'}(X,Y), the complex vector space of (μ⊗ν(\mu\otimes \nu)-measurable functions kk of X×YX\times Y into C\mathbf{C} such that, for ν\nu-almost every y∈Yy\in Y, the mapping kyk_y belongs to Lp′\mathscr{L}^{p'}(X), and such that the mapping k∘k_{\circ} belongs to LLp′(X)q′(Y,ν)\mathscr{L}_{L^{p'}(X)}^{q'}(Y, \nu ) (INT, IV, p. 129, § 3, No.o4^o4, Definition 2). We endow Lp′,q′(X,Y)\mathscr{L}^{p',q'}(X,Y) with the seminorm k↦Np′,q′(k)k\mapsto N_{p',q'}(k); note that one then has Np′,q′(k)=∥k∘∥q′N_{p',q'}(k) =\|k_{\circ}\|_{q'}, where k∘k_{\circ} is regarded as a mapping with values in the Banach space Lp′(X)L^{p'}(X).

Proposition 6 02QW

a) The space Lp′(X×Y)\mathscr{L}^{p'}(X\times Y) is contained in Lp′,p′(X,Y)\mathscr{L}^{p',p'}(X,Y), and for k∈Lp′(X×Y)k\in \mathscr{L}^{p'}(X\times Y), one has Np′,p′(k)=∥k∥p′N_{p', p'}(k) =\|k\|_{p'};

b) The space Lp′,q′(X,Y)\mathscr{L}^{p',q'}(X,Y) is contained in Np,q(X×Y)\mathscr{N}^{p,q}(X\times Y) and for k∈Lp′,q′(X,Y)k\in \mathscr{L}^{p',q'}(X,Y), one has ∥k∥p,q⩽Np′,q′(k)\|k\|_{p,q}\leqslant N_{p',q'}(k).

Let us prove assertion a). Let k∈Lp′(X×Y)k\in \mathscr{L}^{p'}(X\times Y). By INT, V, p. 96, § 8, no4^o4, th. 1, a), the function kyk_y belongs to Lp′(X)\mathscr{L}^{p'}(X) for ν\nu-almost all y∈Yy\in Y.

Let ε>0\varepsilon >0. There exists h∈K(X×Y)h\in \mathscr{K}(X\times Y) such that ∥k−h∥p′<ε\|k-h\|_{p'}< \varepsilon. The function h∘h_{\circ} is a continuous function with compact support from Y into Lp′(X)L^{p'}(X) satisfying

∥k∘−h∘∥p′=Np′,p′(k−h)=∥k−h∥p′<ε \|k_{\circ}-h_{\circ}\|_{p'}= N_{p',p'}(k-h) =\|k-h\|_{p'}< \varepsilon

by Lemma 2. It follows that k∘k_{\circ} belongs to LLp′(X)p′(Y,ν)\mathscr{L}_{L^{p'}(X)}^{p'}(Y, \nu ), that is to say that kk belongs to Lp′,p(X,Y)\mathscr{L}^{p',p}(X,Y). Lemma 2 then proves that Np′,p′(k)=∥k∥p′N_{p', p'}(k) =\|k\|_{p'}.

Let us prove assertion b). Let k∈Lp′,q′(X,Y)k\in \mathscr{L}^{p',q'}(X,Y) and let f∈Lp(X)f\in \mathscr{L}^p(X). For every y∈Yy\in Y, Hölder's inequality (INT, IV, p. 208, § 6, no4^o4, th. 2) applied to kyk_y implies

∫X∗∣k(x,y)f(x)∣dμ(x)⩽∥ky∥p′∥f∥p \int_X^*|k(x, y)f(x)|d\mu(x)\leqslant \|k_y\|_{p'}\|f\|_p

Let g∈Lq′(Y)g\in \mathscr{L}^{q'}(Y). The mappings ff and gg are moderate, since pp and q′q' are finite. Consequently, the mapping (x,y)↦f(x)g(y)(x, y)\mapsto f(x)g(y) is (μ⊗ν)(\mu\otimes \nu )-moderate (cf. INT, V, p. 92, § 8, no3^o3, cor. 2), and therefore the mapping (x,y)↦k(x,y)f(x)g(y)(x, y)\mapsto k(x, y)f(x)g(y) is (μ⊗ν(\mu\otimes \nu)-moderate. By INT, V, p. 93, § 8, no3^o3, prop. 7, a), it follows that

∫X×Y∗∣k(x,y)f(x)g(y)∣d(μ⊗ν) \int_{X\times Y}^*|k(x, y)f(x)g(y)|d(\mu\otimes \nu )
=∫Y∗∣g(y)∣(∫X∗∣k(x,y)f(x)∣dμ(x))dν(y) =\int_Y^*|g(y)|(\int_X^*|k(x, y)f(x)|d\mu(x))d\nu (y)
⩽∥f∥p∫Y∗∥ky∥p′∣g(y)∣dν(y)⩽Np′,q′(k)∥f∥p∥g∥q \leqslant \|f\|_p\int_Y^*\|k_y\|_{p'}|g(y)|d\nu (y)\leqslant N_{p',q'}(k)\|f\|_p\|g\|_q

again using Hölder's inequality. This concludes the proof.

Proposition 7 02QX

Let k∈Lp′,q′(X,Y)k\in \mathscr{L}^{p',q'}(X,Y). The linear mapping uku_k of Lp(X)L^p(X) into Lq′(Y)L^{q'}(Y) is compact.

Suppose first that kk is such that k∘∈K(Y;Lp′k_{\circ}\in \mathscr{K}(Y;\mathscr{L}^{p'}(X)), and denote by A the support of k∘k_{\circ}. Let F be the subspace of K(Y,A;Lp′(X,μ))\mathscr{K}(Y,A;\mathscr{L}^{p'}(X, \mu)) generated by the functions y↦f2(y)f1y\mapsto f_2(y)f_1, where f2∈K(Y,A)f_2\in \mathscr{K}(Y,A) and f1∈Lp′(X)f_1\in \mathscr{L}^{p'}(X). When m∈K(Y;Lp′(X))m\in \mathscr{K}(Y;\mathscr{L}^{p'}(X)) satisfies m∘∈Fm_{\circ}\in F, the linear mapping umu_m is of finite rank, therefore compact. For m1m_1 and m2m_2 in K(Y,A;Lp′\mathscr{K}(Y,A;\mathscr{L}^{p'}(X)), one has moreover

∫′1/q′\int'1/q'
∥um1−um2∥⩽∥m1−m2∥p′,q′=(Y∥m1,y−m2,y∥p′qdν(y)) \|u_{m_1}-u_{m_2}\|\leqslant \|m_1-m_2\|_{p',q'}=(_Y\|m_{1,y}-m_{2,y}\|^q_{p'}d\nu (y))

⩽ν(A)1/q′\leqslant \nu (A)^{1/q'} supy∈YNp′(m1,y−m2,y)_{y\in Y}N_{p'}(m_{1,y}-m_{2,y}).

Since the space F is dense in K(Y,A;Lp′(X))\mathscr{K}(Y,A; L^{p'}(X)) for the topology of uniform convergence in A (INT, III, p. 41, § 1, no1^o1, prop. 1 and INT, III, p. 46, § 1, no2^o2, prop. 5), it follows that the linear mapping uku_k is the limit of a sequence of linear mappings of finite rank. It is therefore compact (cor. 1 of III, p. 4).

Consider the general case. Let k∈Lp′,q′(X,Y)k\in \mathscr{L}^{p',q'}(X,Y). For every ε>0\varepsilon >0, there exists a mapping kε,∘∈K(Y;Lp′(X))k_{\varepsilon ,\circ}\in \mathscr{K}(Y;\mathscr{L}^{p'}(X)) such that

∥k∘−kε,∘∥q′<ε \|k_{\circ}-k_{\varepsilon ,\circ}\|_{q'}< \varepsilon

The corresponding function kε:X×Y→Ck_{\varepsilon}: X\times Y\rightarrow \mathbf{C} then satisfies

∥uk−ukε∥⩽∥k−kε∥p,q⩽Np′,q′(k−kε)=∥k∘−kε,∘∥q′<ε \|u_k-u_{k_{\varepsilon}}\|\leqslant \|k-k_{\varepsilon}\|_{p,q}\leqslant N_{p',q'}(k-k_{\varepsilon}) =\|k_{\circ}-k_{\varepsilon ,\circ}\|_{q'}< \varepsilon

Since ukεu_{k_{\varepsilon}} is compact by what precedes, the mapping uku_k is likewise compact (prop. 2 of III, p. 4).

Put p=1p= 1 and suppose q>1q >1. There may exist mappings k:X×Y→Ck: X\times Y\rightarrow \mathbf{C} such that ky∈L∞(X)k_y\in \mathscr{L}^{\infty}(X) for every y∈Yy\in Y, and such that the integral

∫Y∗∥ky∥∞q′dν(y) \int_Y^*\|k_y\|^{q'}_{\infty}d\nu (y)

is finite (in particular, condition (2) of III, p. 27 is valid), but such that the linear mapping uku_k from L1(X)L^1(X) into Lq′(X)L^{q'}(X) is not compact (exercise 2 of III, p. 119).

In particular, one deduces from the proposition the following corollary:

Corollary 1 (Hilbert–Schmidt) 02QY

Let k∈L2(X×Y)k\in \mathscr{L}^2(X\times Y). The linear mapping uku_k is compact from L2(X)L^2(X) into L2(Y)L^2(Y).

By prop. 5, one has k∈N2,2(X×Y)k\in \mathscr{N}^{2,2}(X\times Y), hence the linear mapping uku_k is defined (prop. 3). One has k∈L2,2(X×Y)k\in \mathscr{L}^{2,2}(X\times Y) (prop. 6, a)), hence uku_k is compact (prop. 7).

Remark 02QZ

In the case p=q=2p=q= 2, it is generally more convenient to express the characterization of the integral operator uku_k by means of the scalar product: it is the unique mapping of L2(X)L^2(X) into L2(Y)L^2(Y) such that

⟨g∣uk(f)⟩=∫X×Yk(x,y)f(x)g(y)‾d(μ⊗ν)(x,y) \langle g|u_k(f)\rangle =\int_{X\times Y}k(x, y)f(x)\overline{g(y)}d(\mu\otimes \nu )(x, y)

for all f∈L2(X)f\in L^2(X) and g∈L2(Y)g\in L^2(Y). Moreover, the adjoint of uku_k is the linear mapping uk∗u_{k^*}, where k∗∈L2(Y×X)k^*\in L^2(Y\times X) satisfies k∗(y,x)=k(x,y)k^*(y, x) =k(x, y) for almost every (y,x)∈Y×X(y, x)\in Y\times X. In fact, for all f∈L2(X)f\in L^2(X) and g∈L2g\in L^2(Y), one has

⟨g∣uk(f)⟩=∫X×Yk(x,y)g(y)‾f(x)d(μ⊗ν)(x,y)=⟨uk∗(g)∣f⟩ \langle g|u_k(f)\rangle =\int_{X\times Y}k(x, y)\overline{g(y)}f(x)d(\mu\otimes \nu )(x, y) =\langle u_{k^*}(g)|f\rangle

Corollary 2 02R0

Let G be a compact topological group endowed with a Haar measure μ\mu. Let pp be a real number such that 1<p<+∞1< p <+\infty and qq the conjugate exponent of pp. Let f∈Lq(G)f\in \mathscr{L}^q(G). Put k(x,y)=f(x−1y)k(x, y) =f(x^{-1}y) for all (x,y)∈G×G(x, y)\in G\times G.

a) One has k∈Lq,p(G,G)k\in \mathscr{L}^{q,p}(G,G);

b) For φ∈Lp(G)\varphi \in L^p(G), the convolution φ∗f\varphi *f belong to Lp(G)L^p(G) and the linear mapping vf:φ↦φ∗fv_f:\varphi \mapsto \varphi *f of Lp(G)L^p(G) into itself is continuous. It coincides with the endomorphism uku_k. In particular, the linear mapping vfv_f is compact.

Since G is compact, the function ff belong to L1(G)\mathscr{L}^1(G). The linear mapping vfv_f is therefore defined and continuous by INT, VIII, p. 167, § 4, No.o5^o5, Prop. 13.

The mapping kk is (μ⊗μ(\mu\otimes \mu)-measurable, and one has ∥ky∥q=∥f∥q\|k_y\|_q=\|f\|_q for every y∈Gy\in G. Since the measure μ\mu is bounded, it follows that

∫G∥ky∥qpdμ(y)=μ(G)∥f∥qp \int_G\|k_y\|^p_qd\mu(y) =\mu(G)\|f\|^p_q

hence k∈Lq,p(G,G)k\in \mathscr{L}^{q,p}(G,G). The linear mapping uku_k is therefore a compact linear mapping of Lp(G)L^p(G) into Lp(G)L^p(G) (Prop. 7).

Let φ∈K(G)\varphi \in \mathscr{K}(G). By INT, VIII, p. 166, § 4, No.o5^o5, Prop. 11 and Prop. 4 of III, p. 29, one then has

vf(φ)(y)=∫Gφ(x)f(x−1y)dμ(x) v_f(\varphi )(y) =\int_G\varphi (x)f(x^{-1}y)d\mu(x)
=∫Gφ(x)k(x,y)dμ(x)=uk(φ)(y) =\int_G\varphi (x)k(x, y)d\mu(x) =u_k(\varphi )(y)

for almost every y∈Gy\in G. This implies that vf=ukv_f=u_k.

5. Restriction of differentiable mappings

Let nn and rr be positive integers, U an open subset of Rn\mathbf{R}^n and F a Banach space. Let us denote by Cr(U;F)\mathscr{C}^r(U; F) the vector space of mappings of class CrC^r of U into F, endowed with the topology of compact CrC^r-convergence. Let us recall that this is the upper bound of the topologies of uniform CrC^r-convergence on K (VAR, R2, 12.3.10, p. 56), when K runs through the set of compact subsets of U. The space C0(U;F)\mathscr{C}^0(U; F) is nothing but the space C(U;F)\mathscr{C}(U; F) of continuous mappings of U into F, endowed with the topology of compact convergence.

Lemma 3 02R1

Let A be the set of multi-indices α∈Nn\alpha \in \mathbf{N}^n such that ∣α∣⩽r|\alpha |\leqslant r and let uu be the linear mapping f↦(∂αf)α∈Af\mapsto (\partial^{\alpha}f)_{\alpha\in A} of Cr(U;F)\mathscr{C}^r(U; F) into C(U;F)A\mathscr{C}(U; F)^A.

a) The mapping uu is injective, continuous, strict, and its image is closed.

b) The topological vector space Cr(U;F)\mathscr{C}^r(U; F) is complete.

The mapping uu is linear and injective. It is continuous and strict by definition of the topology of Cr(U;F)\mathscr{C}^r(U; F).

Let (gα)α∈A(g_{\alpha})_{\alpha\in A} be a point of C(U;F)A\mathscr{C}(U; F)^A adherent to the image of uu. There exists a filter F\mathfrak{F} on Cr(U;F)\mathscr{C}^r(U; F) such that one has gα=g_{\alpha}= limf,F∂αf_{f,\mathscr{F}}\partial^{\alpha}f in C(U;F)\mathscr{C}(U; F) for every α∈A\alpha \in A. Let mm be an integer such that 0⩽m⩽r0\leqslant m\leqslant r. Reasoning by induction on mm, one deduces from Theorem 1 of FVR, II, p. 2, that the mapping g0g_0 is of class CmC^m and that one has gα=∂αg0g_{\alpha}=\partial^{\alpha}g_0 for every α∈Nn\alpha \in \mathbf{N}^n with ∣α∣⩽m|\alpha |\leqslant m. Thus g0g_0 belongs to the space Cr(U;F)\mathscr{C}^r(U; F) and its image under uu is (gα)α∈A(g_{\alpha})_{\alpha\in A}. This proves that the image of uu is closed, and therefore establishes assertion a).

Assertion a) implies that the space Cr(U;F)\mathscr{C}^r(U; F) is isomorphic to its image in C(U;F)A\mathscr{C}(U; F)^A; since this image is closed and the space C(U;F)A\mathscr{C}(U; F)^A is complete (TG, X, p. 9, Corollary 3 of Theorem 2 and TG, II, p. 17, Proposition 10), the space Cr(U;F)\mathscr{C}^r(U; F) is complete.

Proposition 8 02R2

Suppose that F is finite-dimensional. Let ss be an integer such that 0⩽s<r0\leqslant s < r and V a relatively compact open subset of U. The linear mapping f↦f∣Vf\mapsto f|V of Cr(U;F)\mathscr{C}^r(U; F) into Cs(V;F)\mathscr{C}^s(V; F) is compact.

Let W be the set of functions f∈Cr(U;F)f\in \mathscr{C}^r(U; F) whose partial derivatives of order ⩽r\leqslant r take at every point of V a value of norm less than 1. The set W is a neighbourhood of 0 in the space Cr(U;F)\mathscr{C}^r(U; F). Let α\alpha be a multi-index such that ∣α∣⩽s|\alpha |\leqslant s. Consider the set H of functions of the form (∂αf)∣V(\partial^{\alpha}f)|V for ff in W. The set H is an equicontinuous subset of C(V;F)\mathscr{C}(V; F) (TG, X, p. 10) by the mean value theorem (VAR, R, 2.2.3). Moreover, for every x∈Vx\in V, the image of H under the mapping g↦g(x)g\mapsto g(x) is a bounded subset, hence a relatively compact subset, of F. By Ascoli's theorem (TG, X, p. 18, Corollary 2), the set H is relatively compact in C(V;F)\mathscr{C}(V; F). This proves that the linear mapping f↦(∂αf)∣Vf\mapsto (\partial^{\alpha}f)|V of Cr(U;F)\mathscr{C}^r(U; F) into C(V;F)\mathscr{C}(V; F) is compact. The proposition then follows from Lemma 3 and Remarks 5 and 6 of III, p. 3.

6. Restriction of differentiable sections of a vector bundle

Let rr be a positive integer, X a differentiable manifold of class CrC^r locally of finite dimension and E a vector bundle (real or complex) with base X and of class CrC^r. For every open subset U of X, let us denote by Sr(U;E)\mathscr{S}^r(U; E) the vector space (denoted by SEr(U)\mathscr{S}_E^r(U) in VAR, R1, 7.4, p. 74) of sections of class CrC^r of E over U, endowed with the topology of compact CrC^r-convergence.

Lemma 4 02R3

Let U\mathscr{U} be an open covering of X. The mapping u:f↦(f∣U)U∈Uu:f\mapsto (f|U)_{U\in\mathscr{U}} of Sr(X;E)\mathscr{S}^r(X; E) into ∏U∈USr(U;E)\prod_{U\in\mathscr{U}}\mathscr{S}^r(U; E) is linear, injective, continuous and strict. Its image is closed.

The mapping uu is linear, injective and continuous. By virtue of TG, IX, p. 43, prop. 1 and p. 48, cor. 1, every compact subset of X has a finite covering (Ci)i∈I(C_i)_{i\in I} where, for each i∈Ii\in I, the set CiC_i is a compact subset of one of the open sets of the covering U\mathscr{U}. It follows that the linear mapping uu is strict. Finally, its image is closed, since it consists of the families (fU)U∈U(f_U)_{U\in\mathscr{U}} such that fUf_U and fVf_V coincide in U∩VU\cap V for all U and V in U\mathscr{U}.

Proposition 9 02R4

The space Sr(X;E)\mathscr{S}^r(X; E) is complete.

Suppose first that there exist an integer n⩾0n\geqslant 0 and a Banach space F such that X is an open subset of Rn\mathbf{R}^n and E the trivial vector bundle X×FX\times F with base X and fibre F. In this case, the topological vector space Sr(X;E)\mathscr{S}^r(X; E) is isomorphic to Cr(X;F)\mathscr{C}^r(X; F), and the result follows from lemma 3 of III, p. 34.

In the general case, let U\mathscr{U} be an open covering of X by chart domains such that for every U∈UU\in \mathscr{U}, the restriction of E to U is trivializable. By the above lemma, the space Sr(X;E)\mathscr{S}^r(X; E) is isomorphic to the image of the linear mapping f↦(f∣U)U∈Uf\mapsto (f|U)_{U\in\mathscr{U}}, which is closed in the product of the spaces Sr(U;E)\mathscr{S}^r(U; E) for U in U\mathscr{U}. By the preceding case, each of the spaces Sr(U;E)\mathscr{S}^r(U; E) is complete, hence their product is complete (TG, II, p. 17, prop. 10). Consequently Sr(X;E)\mathscr{S}^r(X; E) is complete.

Remark 02R5

Let U\mathscr{U} be an open covering of X by chart domains cU=(U,φU,RnU)c_U= (U, \varphi_U,\mathbf{R}^{n_U}) such that for every U∈UU\in \mathscr{U}, the restriction of E to U is trivializable of type FUF_U, where FUF_U is a Banach space. For every U∈UU\in \mathscr{U}, a section ff of E over U is identified with a mapping fUf_U of φU(U)\varphi_U(U) into FUF_U. It follows from the proof of prop. 9 that the topology of the space Sr(X;E)\mathscr{S}^r(X; E) is defined by the family of semi-norms pU,C,αp_{U,C,\alpha} such that

pU,C,α(f)=p_{U,C,\alpha}(f) = supx∈C∥(∂αfU)(x)∥_{x\in C}\|(\partial^{\alpha}f_U)(x)\|, where U ranges over U,C\mathscr{U}, C ranges over the set of compact subsets of φU(U)\varphi_U(U) and α∈NnU\alpha \in \mathbf{N}^{n_U} ranges over the set of multi-indices such that ∣α∣⩽r|\alpha |\leqslant r.

Proposition 10 02R6

Suppose that the vector bundle E is locally of finite rank. Let ss be an integer such that 0⩽s<r0\leqslant s < r and Y a relatively compact open subset of X. The linear mapping f↦f∣Yf\mapsto f|Y of Sr(X;E)\mathscr{S}^r(X; E) into Ss(Y;E)\mathscr{S}^s(Y; E) is compact.

Suppose first that there exist an integer n⩾0n\geqslant 0 and a finite-dimensional Banach space F such that X is an open subset of Rn\mathbf{R}^n and E the trivial vector bundle X×FX\times F with base X and fibre F. In this case, the topological vector spaces Sr(X;E)\mathscr{S}^r(X; E) and Ss(Y;E)\mathscr{S}^s(Y; E) are isomorphic to Cr(X;F)\mathscr{C}^r(X; F) and Cs(Y;F)\mathscr{C}^s(Y; F), respectively, and prop. 10 is a consequence of prop. 8.

Let us pass to the general case. Let C be a compact subset of X containing Y. For every point xx of C, choose an open neighbourhood U(x)U(x) of xx in X which is a coordinate domain over which the vector bundle E is trivializable. Moreover, choose an open relatively compact neighbourhood V(x)V(x) of xx in U(x)U(x). Since the set C is compact, it is covered by a finite family (V(x1),...,V(xm))(V(x_1), . . . ,V(x_m)) of such open sets. For every ii, put Ui=U(xi)U_i= U(x_i) and Yi=V(xi)∩YY_i= V(x_i)\cap Y. Then YiY_i is an open relatively compact subset of UiU_i and one has Y=Y1∪⋯∪YmY = Y_1\cup \cdots \cup Y_m. The linear mappings f↦f∣Uif\mapsto f|U_i of Sr(X;E)\mathscr{S}^r(X; E) into Sr(Ui;E)\mathscr{S}^r(U_i; E) are continuous and the linear mappings g↦g∣Yig\mapsto g|Y_i of Sr(Ui;E)\mathscr{S}^r(U_i; E) into Ss(Yi;E)\mathscr{S}^s(Y_i; E) are compact by the first part of the proof. The linear mappings f↦f∣Yif\mapsto f|Y_i of Sr(X;E)\mathscr{S}^r(X; E) into Ss(Yi;E)\mathscr{S}^s(Y_i; E) are therefore compact (prop. 3 of III, p. 5). Taking into account lemma 4, applied to the covering of Y by the open sets YiY_i, and remarks 5 and 6 of III, p. 3, the linear mapping f↦f∣Yf\mapsto f|Y of Sr(X;E)\mathscr{S}^r(X; E) into Ss(Y;E)\mathscr{S}^s(Y; E) is compact, which completes the proof.

7. Restriction of analytic sections of a vector bundle

Let X be a complex analytic manifold locally of finite dimension and E an analytic vector bundle with base X (VAR, p. 35 and VAR, p. 70). Denote by Sω(X;E)\mathscr{S}^{\omega}(X; E) the vector space of analytic sections of E on X, endowed with the topology of compact convergence.

Lemma 5 02R7

Let X0X_0 be the underlying real analytic manifold of X and E0E_0 the complex vector bundle on X0X_0 underlying E.

a) The vector subspace Sω(X;E)\mathscr{S}^{\omega}(X; E) of S0(X0;E0)\mathscr{S}^0(X_0; E_0) is closed, and the injection of Sω(X;E)\mathscr{S}^{\omega}(X; E) into S0(X0;E0)\mathscr{S}^0(X_0; E_0) is continuous and strict ;

b) The canonical injection of Sω(X;E)\mathscr{S}^{\omega}(X; E) into S1(X0;E0)\mathscr{S}^1(X_0; E_0) is continuous.

Suppose first that there exist an integer n⩾0n\geqslant 0 and a Banach space F such that X is an open subset of Cn\mathbf{C}^n and E the trivial vector bundle X×FX\times F. In this case, the topological vector spaces Sω(X;E)\mathscr{S}^{\omega}(X; E), S0(X0;E0)\mathscr{S}^0(X_0; E_0) and S1(X0;E0)\mathscr{S}^1(X_0; E_0) are isomorphic to Cω(X;F),C0(X0;F)\mathscr{C}^{\omega}(X; F),\mathscr{C}^0(X_0; F) and C1(X0;F)\mathscr{C}^1(X_0; F) respectively, and the vector space S0(X0;E0)\mathscr{S}^0(X_0; E_0) is metrizable (TG, X, p. 20, cor. of prop. 1). The lemma then follows from VAR, 3.3.2, p. 28.

Let us pass to the general case. Let F\mathfrak{F} be a filter on Sω(X;E)\mathscr{S}^{\omega}(X; E) which converges in the space S0(X0;E0)\mathscr{S}^0(X_0; E_0) to a limit ff. It is a question of proving that ff belongs to Sω(X;E)\mathscr{S}^{\omega}(X; E) and that the filter F\mathfrak{F} converges to ff in the space S1(X0;E0)\mathscr{S}^1(X_0; E_0). This statement is of a local nature, and therefore follows from the first part of the proof.

Proposition 11 02R8

Suppose that the vector bundle E is locally of finite rank. Let Y be an open relatively compact subset of X. The restriction mapping f↦f∣Yf\mapsto f|Y of Sω(X;E)\mathscr{S}^{\omega}(X; E) into Sω(Y;E)\mathscr{S}^{\omega}(Y; E) is compact.

With the notation of lemma 5, one has a commutative diagram

Sω(X;E)←i→S1(X0;E0) \mathscr{S}^{\omega}(X; E)\leftarrow_i\rightarrow \mathscr{S}^1(X_0; E_0)
→←u→←v(3) \rightarrow \leftarrow_u\rightarrow \leftarrow_v \tag{3}
Sω(Y;E)←j→S0(Y0;E0) \mathscr{S}^{\omega}(Y; E)\leftarrow_j\rightarrow \mathscr{S}^0(Y_0; E_0)

where ii and jj are the canonical injections and u,vu,v the restriction mappings. The mapping ii is continuous (Lemma 5, b)), and the mapping uu is compact (Proposition 10). Since the canonical injection jj is continuous, strict, and has closed image (Lemma 5, a)), the mapping uu is compact (Remark 5 of III, p. 3).

Corollary 02R9

Let X be a compact complex analytic manifold and E an analytic vector bundle over X, locally of finite rank. The vector space Sω(X;E)\mathscr{S}^{\omega}(X; E) is finite-dimensional.

Since it is compact, the analytic manifold X is locally finite-dimensional. By Proposition 11, the identity mapping of Sω(X;E)\mathscr{S}^{\omega}(X; E) is a compact linear mapping. This implies that the space Sω(X;E)\mathscr{S}^{\omega}(X; E) is finite-dimensional (Remark 3 of III, p. 2).

Exercises

See the exercises for § 2.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-6-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.