Bourbaki

Proposition 6

Tag 02QW, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02QW].

Théories spectrales, chapter III, § 2. Exemples d’applications linéaires compactes

a) The space Lp′(X×Y)\mathscr{L}^{p'}(X\times Y) is contained in Lp′,p′(X,Y)\mathscr{L}^{p',p'}(X,Y), and for k∈Lp′(X×Y)k\in \mathscr{L}^{p'}(X\times Y), one has Np′,p′(k)=∥k∥p′N_{p', p'}(k) =\|k\|_{p'};

b) The space Lp′,q′(X,Y)\mathscr{L}^{p',q'}(X,Y) is contained in Np,q(X×Y)\mathscr{N}^{p,q}(X\times Y) and for k∈Lp′,q′(X,Y)k\in \mathscr{L}^{p',q'}(X,Y), one has ∥k∥p,q⩽Np′,q′(k)\|k\|_{p,q}\leqslant N_{p',q'}(k).

Let us prove assertion a). Let k∈Lp′(X×Y)k\in \mathscr{L}^{p'}(X\times Y). By INT, V, p. 96, § 8, no4^o4, th. 1, a), the function kyk_y belongs to Lp′(X)\mathscr{L}^{p'}(X) for ν\nu-almost all y∈Yy\in Y.

Let ε>0\varepsilon >0. There exists h∈K(X×Y)h\in \mathscr{K}(X\times Y) such that ∥k−h∥p′<ε\|k-h\|_{p'}< \varepsilon. The function h∘h_{\circ} is a continuous function with compact support from Y into Lp′(X)L^{p'}(X) satisfying

∥k∘−h∘∥p′=Np′,p′(k−h)=∥k−h∥p′<ε \|k_{\circ}-h_{\circ}\|_{p'}= N_{p',p'}(k-h) =\|k-h\|_{p'}< \varepsilon

by Lemma 2. It follows that k∘k_{\circ} belongs to LLp′(X)p′(Y,ν)\mathscr{L}_{L^{p'}(X)}^{p'}(Y, \nu ), that is to say that kk belongs to Lp′,p(X,Y)\mathscr{L}^{p',p}(X,Y). Lemma 2 then proves that Np′,p′(k)=∥k∥p′N_{p', p'}(k) =\|k\|_{p'}.

Let us prove assertion b). Let k∈Lp′,q′(X,Y)k\in \mathscr{L}^{p',q'}(X,Y) and let f∈Lp(X)f\in \mathscr{L}^p(X). For every y∈Yy\in Y, Hölder's inequality (INT, IV, p. 208, § 6, no4^o4, th. 2) applied to kyk_y implies

∫X∗∣k(x,y)f(x)∣dμ(x)⩽∥ky∥p′∥f∥p \int_X^*|k(x, y)f(x)|d\mu(x)\leqslant \|k_y\|_{p'}\|f\|_p

Let g∈Lq′(Y)g\in \mathscr{L}^{q'}(Y). The mappings ff and gg are moderate, since pp and q′q' are finite. Consequently, the mapping (x,y)↦f(x)g(y)(x, y)\mapsto f(x)g(y) is (μ⊗ν)(\mu\otimes \nu )-moderate (cf. INT, V, p. 92, § 8, no3^o3, cor. 2), and therefore the mapping (x,y)↦k(x,y)f(x)g(y)(x, y)\mapsto k(x, y)f(x)g(y) is (μ⊗ν(\mu\otimes \nu)-moderate. By INT, V, p. 93, § 8, no3^o3, prop. 7, a), it follows that

∫X×Y∗∣k(x,y)f(x)g(y)∣d(μ⊗ν) \int_{X\times Y}^*|k(x, y)f(x)g(y)|d(\mu\otimes \nu )
=∫Y∗∣g(y)∣(∫X∗∣k(x,y)f(x)∣dμ(x))dν(y) =\int_Y^*|g(y)|(\int_X^*|k(x, y)f(x)|d\mu(x))d\nu (y)
⩽∥f∥p∫Y∗∥ky∥p′∣g(y)∣dν(y)⩽Np′,q′(k)∥f∥p∥g∥q \leqslant \|f\|_p\int_Y^*\|k_y\|_{p'}|g(y)|d\nu (y)\leqslant N_{p',q'}(k)\|f\|_p\|g\|_q

again using Hölder's inequality. This concludes the proof.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-6-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.